[1]邢海涛　袁　波　谭占国.同期与分期行脑室-腹腔分流术与颅骨成形术治疗颅脑损伤术后脑积水的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(11):750-752.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.005]
　XING Hai-tao,YUAN Bo,TAN Zhan-guo..Curative effectiveness of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and cranioplasty for traumatic brain injury patients with hydrocephalus secondary to decompressive craniectomy: staged operation vs. one-stage operation[J].,2020,(11):750-752.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.005]
点击复制

同期与分期行脑室-腹腔分流术与颅骨成形术治疗颅脑损伤术后脑积水的疗效分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年11期
页码:
750-752
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Curative effectiveness of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and cranioplasty for traumatic brain injury patients with hydrocephalus secondary to decompressive craniectomy: staged operation vs. one-stage operation
文章编号:
1009-153X（2020）11-0750-03
作者:
邢海涛　袁　波　谭占国
462000 河南，漯河市中心医院（漯河医学高等专科学校第一附属医院）神经外科（邢海涛、袁　波、谭占国）
Author(s):
XING Hai-tao;  YUAN Bo;  TAN Zhan-guo.
Department of Neurosurgery, Luohe Central Hospital, Luohe 462000, China
关键词:
颅脑损伤; 去骨瓣减压术; 脑室-腹腔分流术; 颅骨成形术; 手术时机
Keywords:
Traumatic brain injury;  Decompressive craniectomy;  Hydrocephalus;  Ventriculoperitoneal shunt;  Cranioplasty
分类号:
R 742.7; R 651.1+1
DOI:
doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比分析同期和分期行脑室-腹腔分流术（VPS）与颅骨成形术治疗颅脑损伤术后脑积水的效果。方法 回顾性分析2015年9月至2018年4月收治的79例颅脑损伤术后脑积水的临床资料。同期行VPS和颅骨成形术47例（同期组），分期行VPS和颅骨成形术32例（VPS后间隔至少3个月进行颅骨成形术；分期组）。术前、术后7 d采用功能独立性评价量表（FIM）、神经行为认知状况测试（NCSE）评价认知功能情况。术后3个月采用GCS评分、GOS评分评定病人意识及预后情况。结果 术后7 d，两组FIM评分、NCSE评分均明显升高（P<0.05），同期组明显高于分期组（P<0.05）。术后半年内，同期组术后并发症发生率（12.77%，6/47）明显低于分期组（31.25%，10/32；P<0.05）。术后3个月，同期组GCS评分[（12.02±2.87）分]明显高于分期组[（10.09±1.81）分；P<0.05），但是GOS评分[（4.24±0.75）分]与分期组[（3.97±0.70）分]无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 对于颅脑损伤术后脑积水，同期和分期行VPS与颅骨成形术，均可有效改善病人认知功能和预后，而同期手术更具优势。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of simultaneous and separate ventricular-peritoneal shunt (VPS) and cranioplasty (CP) for the traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with hydrocephalus secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC). Methods The clinical data of 79 TBI patients with hydrocephalus secondary to DC who were admitted to our hospital from September 2015 to April 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these 79 patients, 47 underwent simultaneous VPS and CP (one-stage group), and 32 underwent separate VPS and CP (CP was performed at least 3 months after VPS; two-stage group). The functional independence measure (FIM) score and neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (NCSE) score were used to evaluate the cognitive function before and 7 days after the operation. GCS score and GOS score were used to assess patients’ awareness and prognoses 3 months after the operation. Results Seven days after operation, the FIM score and NCSE score of the two groups were significantly increased (P<0.05), and the one-stage group was significantly higher than the two-stage group (P<0.05). Within half a year after the surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications in the one-stage group (12.77%, 6/47) was significantly lower than that (31.25%, 10/32) in the two-stage group (P<0.05). Three months after the operation, the GCS score [(12.02±2.87) points] in the one-stage group were significantly higher than that [(10.09±1.81) points] in the two-stage group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the GOS score between one-stage group [(4.24±0.75) points] and two-stage group [(3.97±0.70) points; P>0.05]. Conclusions For the TBI patients with hydrocephalus secondary to DC, simultaneous and separate VPS and CP can effectively improve the patients’ cognitive function and prognoses, and simultaneous surgery has more advantages.

参考文献/References:

[1] Chen H, Yuan F, Chen SW, et al. Predicting posttraumatic hydrocephalus: derivation and validation of a risk scoring system based on clinical characteristics [J]. Metab Brain Dis, 2017, 32(5): 1427-1435.
[2] Santana-Cabrera L, Ocampo-Pérez J, Rodríguez-Escot C, et al. Safety and outcomes of decompressive craniectomy after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administra-tion for malignant cerebral infarction [J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2016, 30(2): 274-276.
[3] 张建斌，黄齐兵，纪延伟，等. 去骨瓣减压术后脑积水的治疗策略及手术并发症的分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2016，32（10）：1029-1033.
[4] 吴中亚. 经翼点入路显微手术治疗前颅动脉瘤破裂的临床研究[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志，2018，21（17）：1905-1910.
[5] 中华神经外科分会神经创伤专业组，中华创伤学会分会神经创伤专业组. 颅脑创伤后脑积水诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2014，30（8）：840-843.
[6] Lundgren NA, Tennant A. Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (FIM)revisited [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2011, 43(10): 884-891.
[7] Mertens AC, Sencer S, Myers CD, et al. Neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (NCSE)[J]. Sociol Quart, 2011, 17(1): 27-41.
[8] 杜金涛，李晓丽，刘玉芳，等. 早期颅骨修补术联合脑室腹腔分流术治疗重症颅脑外伤合并脑积水孕妇的效果观察[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志，2018，36（1）：104-106.
[9] 肖华明，颜明布，邹积典，等. 早期脑室-腹腔分流术及颅骨修补术治疗去骨瓣减压术后脑积水30例[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2017，22（1）：48-49.
[10] Pechmann A, Anastasopoulos C, Korinthenberg R, et al. De-compressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury in children: complications and outcome [J]. Neuropediatrics,2015, 46(1): 5-12.
[11] 王春晖，王君玉，李振兴，等. 不同时期颅骨修补治疗颅骨缺损的疗效观察[J]. 第二军医大学学报，2017，38（3）：335-338.
[12] 钱　明，王学建，汪志峰，等. 不同手术方式治疗脑外伤术后脑积水患者的效果[J]. 实用医学杂志，2017，33（15）：2601-2603.
[13] 张建斌，黄奇兵，张法学，等. 去骨瓣减压术后颅骨缺损伴脑积水手术时机临床分析[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志，2017，16（1）：64-66.
[14] 卢荣加，周绍福，候建金，等. 脑室腹腔分流术与颅骨修补术同期治疗脑外伤的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国急救医学，2016，36（12）：36-37.

相似文献/References:

[1]张善纲 综述.现代战争中颅脑损伤的特点及功能康复[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(11):701.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.11.021]
[2]钟秀均　黄书岚.复方醒脑液治疗颅脑损伤后综合征的临床观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):278.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.007]
　ZHONG Xiu-jun,HUANG Shu-lan..Clinical observation on treatment of compound decoction for cerebral prorection for post-traumatic brain syndrome[J].,2016,(11):278.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.007]
[3]李国亮　邸　方　杨亚东.香芹酚通过抑制脑水肿与氧化应激反应保护大鼠 颅脑损伤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.009]
　LI Guo-liang,DI Fang,YANG Ya-dong..Carvacrol protects against traumatic brain injury in rats through suppressing the brain edma and oxidative stress[J].,2016,(11):283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.009]
[4]罗心凯　陈治标　陈谦学.免缝胶原海绵人工硬脑膜在颅脑损伤大骨瓣减压术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):357.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.012]
　LUO Xin-kai,CHEN Zhi-biao,CHEN Qian-xue..Application of collagen sponge artificial dura without suturing to big bone flap decompression after traumatic brain injury[J].,2016,(11):357.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.012]
[5]贺瑛福　肖宗宇　马进海　许常林　裴　杰　袁　岗　张广华　 巨　虎.高海拔地区重型颅脑损伤血清FSH、LH、PRL的变化[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):359.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.013]
　HE Ying-fu,XIAO Zong-yu,MA Jin-hai,et al.Changes in serum FSH, LH and PRL levels in the patients with severe traumatic brain injury in plateau[J].,2016,(11):359.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.013]
[6]满明昊　李立宏　杨彦龙　李　敏　郭少春.颅脑损伤术后细胞免疫指标变化及脾多肽对其影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):362.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.014]
　MAN Ming-hao,LI Li-hong,YANG Yan-yong,et al.Changes in peripheral cells immunity after operation and effect of spleen polypeptide on them in patients with traumatic brain injury[J].,2016,(11):362.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.014]
[7]程　勇　秦加新　戢翰升　李　刚　聂劲林　李　强.颅脑损伤术中急性脑膨出的相关因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):374.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.019]
[8]张一帆 综述　张国来 审校.弥漫性轴索损伤影像学诊断的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):442.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.020]
[9]陈吉钢　张丹枫　魏嘉良　邹　伟　侯立军.创伤性眶上裂综合征的治疗陈吉钢[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):200.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.003]
　CHEN Ji-gang,ZHANG Dan-feng,WEI Jiang-liang,et al.Management of traumatic superior orbital fissure syndrome (report of 22 cases)[J].,2016,(11):200.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.003]
[10]肖连福　黄瑞宏　陈昌勇.外伤性颅内静脉窦血栓形成1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):256.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.024]
[11]黄志伟　何绍伟　戴先前.颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后硬膜下积液的治疗分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(08):501.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.08.022]
[12]王正君　姬西团.早期颅骨修补术对颅脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后神经功能及并发症的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(10):626.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.021]
[13]谈志辉,陈　艾,江才永,等.颅脑损伤后发生脑积水的危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):750.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.006]
　TAN Zhi-hui,CHEN Ai,JIANG Cai-yong,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to hydrocephalus occurrence in patients with traumatic brain injury[J].,2016,(11):750.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.006]
[14]冯善刚　解昆明　王增武.双额叶挫裂伤去骨瓣减压术后颅内压监测的应用价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(05):345.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.05.013]
[15]李　龙　杨金庆　薛　勇　赵学俊.颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后脑积水危险因素分析及分流时机[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(09):600.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.008]
　LI Long,YANG Jin-qing,XUE Yong,et al.Analysis of risk factors and timing of shunt for hydrocephalus in patients with traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy[J].,2020,(11):600.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.008]
[16]张宏兵,祁飞,张荣军,等.颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后并发脑积水的治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(06):491.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.06.020]
[17]张宏兵,刘帅,高林涛,等.颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后并发巨大脑膨出1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(08):540.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.08.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-25