[1]陈英,廖利萍,张清涛,等.急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的外科治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(06):479-481.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.06.015]
点击复制

急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的外科治疗()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
479-481
栏目:
经验介绍
出版日期:
2022-06-30

文章信息/Info

文章编号:
1009-153X(2022)06-0479-03
作者:
陈英廖利萍张清涛何琦余小琴
400014 重庆市急救医疗中心神经外科(陈英、廖利萍、张清涛、何琦、余小琴)
关键词:
急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中桥接治疗直接机械取栓术临床效果
分类号:
R743;R815.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.06.015
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 对比分析桥接治疗和直接取栓术治疗急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年10月收治的120例急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的临床资料。应用桥接治疗48例(桥接组),直接取栓术治疗72例(取栓组)。结果 桥接组血管再通成功率明显高于取栓组(P<0.05)。出院时,桥接组NIHSS评分明显低于取栓组(P<0.05)。术后90 d,桥接组预后良好率均明显高于取栓组(P<0.05)。桥接组病死率明显低于取栓组(P<0.05)。结论 对于急性大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中,桥接治疗可加快功能恢复,改善病人预后,提高病人存活率。

参考文献/References:

[1] Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(1): 11-20.
[2] Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1009-1018.
[3] Weber R, Nordmeyer H, Hadisurya J, et al. Comparison of outcome and interventional complication rate in patients with acute stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(3): 229-233.
[4] Leker RR, Pikis S, Gomori JM, et al. Is bridging necessary:a pilot study of bridging versus primary stentriever-based endovascular reperfusion in large anterior circulation strokes [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(6): 1163-1167.
[5] Broegmorvay A, Mordasini P, Bernasconi C, et al. Direct mechanical intervention versus combined intravenous and mechanical intervention in large artery anterior circulation stroke [J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(4): 1037.
[6] Weber R, Nordmeyer H, Hadisurya J, et al. Comparison of outcome and interventional complication rate in patients with acute stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016,9(3):229.
[7] Park HK, Chung JW, Hong JH, et al. Preceding intravenous thrombolysis in patients receiving endovascular therapy [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis (Basel, Switzerland), 2017, 44(null): 51-58.
[8] Maier IL, Behme D, Schnieder M, et al. Bridging-therapy with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator improves functional outcome in patients with endovascular treatment in acute stroke [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017, 372: 300-304.
[9] Pfefferkorn T, Holtmannsptter M, Patzig M, et al. Preceding intravenous thrombolysis facilitates endovascular mechanical recanalization in large intracranial artery occlusion [J]. Int J Stroke, 2012, 7(1): 14-18.
[10] Merlino G, Sponza M, Petralia B, et al. Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical throm-bectomy: a prospective single-center study [J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2017, 44(2): 203-209.
[11] Guedin P, Larcher A, Decroix JP, et al. Prior IV thrombolysis facilitates mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(5): 952-957.
[12] Behme D, Kabbasch C, Kowoll A, et al. Intravenous throm-bolysis facilitates successful recanalization with stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy in middle cerebral artery occlusions [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 25(4):954-959.
[13] Desilles J, Loyau S, Syvannarath V, et al. Alteplase reduces downstream microvascular thrombosis and improves the benefit of large artery recanalization in stroke [J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(11): 3241.
[14] Zhang J, Chen S, Shi S, et al. Direct endovascular treatment versus bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(4): 321-325.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(2021-12-14收稿,2022-03-13修回)
通讯作者:廖利萍,E-mail:279634228@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-31