[1]库洪彬　张颜礼　张卫民　张　兰　刘艳红　李国锋　孙鑫晔　薛振生.CTA和CTP点征在中等量高血压性基底节区出血超早期手术方式选择中的应用价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(05):283-285.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.05.009]
　KU Hong-bin,ZHANG Yan-li,MENG Zhi-yong,et al.Value of spot sign on CTA and CTP imaging in selecting ultra-early operative methods for patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemotoma[J].,2020,(05):283-285.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.05.009]
点击复制

CTA和CTP点征在中等量高血压性基底节区出血超早期手术方式选择中的应用价值()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
283-285
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of spot sign on CTA and CTP imaging in selecting ultra-early operative methods for patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemotoma
文章编号:
1009-153X（2020）05-0283-03
作者:
库洪彬　张颜礼　张卫民　张　兰　刘艳红　李国锋　孙鑫晔　薛振生
054000 河北，邢台市第三医院神经外三科（库洪彬、张颜礼、张卫民、张　兰、刘艳红、李国锋、孙鑫晔、薛振生）
Author(s):
KU Hong-bin;  ZHANG Yan-li;  MENG Zhi-yong;  XUE Zheng-zheng;  ZHANG Wei-min;  ZHANG Xiang-hui;  LIU Long;  SUN Xin-ye.
Department of Neurosurgery, Xingtai Third Hospital, Xingtai 054000, China
关键词:
高血压性脑出血; 中等量出血; 基底节区; CTA点征; CTP点征; 钻孔引流术; 开颅手术
Keywords:
Moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage;  Spot sign;  CTA;  CTP;  Ultra-early time;  Operative method
分类号:
R 743.34; R 651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.05.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨CT血管成像（CTA）和CT灌注成像（CTP）点征在中等量（出血量30~60 ml）高血压性基底节区出血超早期手术方式选择中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2016年2月至2019年7月收治的242例中等量高血压性基底节区出血的临床资料。118例完成颅脑CTA、CTP检查（观察组），124例未完成颅脑CTA、CTP检查（对照组）。观察组病人根据CTA、CTP检查结果选择手术方式：1项点征阳性采用开颅手术，2项点征均为阴性采用钻孔引流术。对照组病人根据对全麻手术的耐受性及知情同意情况选择手术方式：耐受性差或不同意开颅手术的病人采用钻孔引流术，耐受性尚可且不同意引流术的病人病人采用开颅手术。结果 观察组引流术治疗有效率明显高于对照组（P<0.05），而观察组引流术后血肿增大率、病死率、颅内感染发生率较对照组均明显降低（P<0.05）。观察组开颅手术治疗有效率、术后血肿增大率、病死率、颅内感染发生率与对照组均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 联合应用CTA、CTP点征作为客观依据选择中等量脑出血超早期手术方式，可提高治疗有效率，降低术后血肿扩大、死亡及颅内感染的风险，改善病人预后
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of spot sign on CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) imaging in selecting ultra-early operative methods for patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage (HBGH). Methods The clinical data of 242 patients with moderate HBGH who underwent surgery from February 2016 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred and eighteen patients completed the CTA and CTP examination (observation group), 124 did not (control group). The surgical method for patients in the observation group was chose according to the CTA and CTP examination results: the craniotomy was chose when one point sign was positive on the CTA and CTP imaging, and the drainage was chose when both point signs were negative. The surgical method for patients in the control group was chose based on the tolerance to general anesthesia and informed consent: the drainage was chose for patients with poor tolerance or disagreement with craniotomy, and the craniotomy was used for patients with acceptable tolerance and disagree with the operation. Results The effective rate of drainage treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), while the rate of hematoma and mortality, and the incidence of intracranial infection after drainage in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the effective rate, postoperative hematoma enlargement rate, mortality rate, and the incidence of intracranial infection between both the groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of CTA and CTP points as an objective basis to select the surgical method for moderate HBGH can improve the treatment efficiency, reduce the risk of postoperative hematoma expansion, death and intracranial infection, and improve patient prognosis

参考文献/References:

[1] Chen Y, Godage IS, Sengupta S, et al. MR conditional steer- able needle robot for intracerebral hemorrhage removal [J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2019, 14(1): 105-115.
[2] 叶建忠，张宏伟，王守利，等. 老年高血压脑出血患者神经 内镜下血肿清除术与小骨窗开颅血肿清除术的临床疗 效[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志，2019，21（5）：530-533.
[3] 周厚杰，刘宏斌，吴　涛，等. 神经内镜下手术清除脑内血 肿的疗效分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2019，24（5）： 308-309.
[4] Morotti A, Dowlatshahi D, Boulouis G, et al. Predicting intracerebral hemorrhage expansion with noncontrast com- puted tomography: the bat score [J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(5): 1163-1169.
[5] Brouwers HB, Chang Y, Falcone GJ, et al. Predicting hema- toma expansion after primary intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. JAMA Neurol, 2014, 71(2): 158-164.
[6] Hemphill JC, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemo- rrhage [J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(7): 2032-2060.
[7] Dowlatshahi D, Brouwers HB, Demchuk AM, et al. Predict- ing intracerebal hemorrhasge growth with the spot sign: the effect of onset-to-scant time [J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(3): 695- 700.
[8] Wang B, Yan S, Xu M, et al. Timing of occurrence is the most important characteristic of spot sign [J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(5): 1233-1238.
[9] Wang YH, Fan JY, Luo GD, et al. Hematoma volume affects the accu-racy of computed tomographic angiography 'spot sign' in predicting hematoma expansion after acute intra- cerebral hemorrhage [J]. Eur Neurol, 2011, 65(3): 150-155.
[10] Hersh EH, Gologorsky Y, Chartrain AG, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2018, 18(6): 34-37.
[11] Scaggiante J, Zhang X, Mocco J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2018, 49 (11): 2612-2620.
[12] Fu C, Wang N, Chen B, et al. Surgical management of mod erate basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery, minimally inva- sive puncture and drainage, and craniotomy [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 122: e995-e1001.

相似文献/References:

[1]郑永强　陈玉宝.高血压性基底节区出血病人血浆硫化氢浓度的变化[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(03):167.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.03.014]
[2]李茂雷　栾　雷　李录华　刘　阳　丰育功.显微镜下和神经内镜下手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(03):171.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.03.016]
[3]张红波　张世忠　白萌萌　刘　利　郑　虎　谭一虎　袁辉胜　刘红朝.立体定向辅助下神经内镜手术清除脑内血肿1例并文献复习[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(07):431.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.07.018]
[4]王建兵　宋　歌　刘永建　王彦刚.经额穿刺引流术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(05):310.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.05.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者：薛振生，E-mail：greenlandsunny1@163.com（2019-07-22收稿，2019-11-06修回）
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01