[1]秦海林,徐国政,胡军民,等.多参数监测在颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(12):983-985.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.12.008]
　QIN Hai-lin,XU Guo-zheng,HU Jun-min,et al.Application of multi-parameter monitoring to carotid endarterectomy for patients with carotid artery stenosis[J].,2022,27(12):983-985.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.12.008]
点击复制

多参数监测在颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中的应用()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2022年12期
页码:
983-985
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of multi-parameter monitoring to carotid endarterectomy for patients with carotid artery stenosis
文章编号:
1009-153X（2022）12-0983-03
作者:
秦海林; 徐国政; 胡军民; 秦汉; 黄成
430070武汉，中国人民解放军中部战区总医院神经外科（秦海林、徐国政、胡军民、秦汉、黄成）
Author(s):
QIN Hai-lin;  XU Guo-zheng;  HU Jun-min;  QIN Han;  HUANG Cheng
Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Central Theatre Command, PLA, Wuhan 430070, China
关键词:
颈动脉狭窄; 颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术; 颈内动脉返流压; 体感诱发电位; 运动诱发电位; 疗效
Keywords:
Carotid endarterectomy;  Stump pressure;  Somatosensory evoked potential;  Motor evoked potential
分类号:
R743; R651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.12.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨多参数监测在颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术（CEA）中的作用。方法 回顾性分析2016年5月至2021年12月在多参数联合监测下实施CEA治疗的75例颈动脉狭窄的临床资料。术中应用颈内动脉返流压及体感诱发电位、运动诱发电位监测。结果 72例返流压≥25 mmHg，3例<25 mmHg；58例体感诱发电位无明显变化，2例轻度降低复通后好转，6例下降超过50%但恢复，5例下降超过50%未恢复，4例下降超过75%未恢复。术中5例使用转流管。术后发生脑卒中2例，未发生栓塞事件。术后1周内复查颈动脉CTA显示颈总动脉及颈内动脉均通畅，1例颈外动脉闭塞，1例颈外动脉血栓形成并管腔重度狭窄。术后随访3个月~5年，末次随访GOS评分5分74例，3分1例。结论 CEA是预防缺血性脑卒中的有效方法，术中联合监测颈动脉返流压、体感诱发电位和运动诱发电位，是可行的、有效的，可提高CEA的效果。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under multi-parameter monitoring for patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Methods The clinical data of 75 patients with CAS who underwent CEA under multi-parameters monitoring from May 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, the stump pressure (StP) of the internal carotid artery (ICA), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) were monitored simultaneously. Results CEA was completed in all the patients. The StP of 72 patients was more than 25 mmHg and 3 less than 25 mmHg. SSEP did not significantly change in 58 patients, mildly decreased in 2 patients with improvement after recirculation, dropped by more than 50% with recovery in 6 patients, dropped by more than 50% without recovery in 5 patients, and dropped by more than 75% without recovery in 4 patients. Selective shunt was used in 5 patients during the operation. The postoperative ischemic events occurred in 2 patients. No embolization occurred after the operation. CTA within 1 week after surgery showed that the common carotid artery and ICA were patency in all the patients, external carotid artery occlusion occurred in 1 patient, and severe stenosis of external carotid artery occurred in 1 patient. The follow-up (range, 3 months to 5 years) showed a GOS score of 5 in 74 patients and a score of 3 in 1 at the last follow-up. Conclusions CEA is an effective method for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Intraoperative monitoring of StP, SSEP, and MEP is feasible and effective, which can improve the effectiveness of CEA.

参考文献/References:

[1]闫忠军，徐东为，胡　焱，等. 急性缺血性脑卒中的治疗体会[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2017，22（8）：591-592.
[2]Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators [J]. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339(20): 1415-1425.
[3]European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) [J]. Lancet, 1998, 351(9113):1379-1387.
[4]Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(7): 2160-2236.
[5]Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J]. Stroke, 2019, 50: e344-e418.
[6]Findlay JM, Kesarwani R, Jacka M, et al. Combined stump pressure and oximetry for shunt use during carotid endar-terectomy [J]. Can J Neurol Sci, 2017, 44: 692-696.
[7]Matsuura S, Takayama T, Yuhn CY, et al. Carotid stump pressure and contralateral internal carotid stenosis ratio during carotid endarterectomies: 1D-0D hemodynamic simulation of cerebral perfusion [J]. Ann Vasc Dis, 2021, 14(1): 39-45.
[8]Udesh R, Natarajan P, Thiagarajan K, et al. Transcranial doppler monitoring in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36: 621-630.
[9]Pennekamp CW, Moll FL, De Borst GJ. Role of transcranial Doppler in cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome [J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2012, 53(6): 765-771.
[10]Chib T, Fujiwara S, Oura K, et al. Superb microvascular imaging ultrasound for cervical carotid artery stenosis for prediction of the development of microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler during carotid exposure in endarterectomy [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra, 2021, 11(2): 61-68.
[11]Hans SS, Jareunpoon O. Prospective evaluation of electroen-cephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45: 511-515.
[12]Nwachuku EL, Balze JR, Yabes JG, et al. Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. JAMA Neurol, 2015, 72(1): 73-80.
[13]Seidel K, Jeschko J, Schucht P, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential and transcranial Doppler monitoring to guide shunting in carotid endarterectomy [J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2021, 82(4): 299-307.
[14]Malcharek MJ, Kulpok A, Deletis V, et al. Intraoperative multimodal evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study of 264 patients [J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 120: 1352-1360.
[15]Alcantara SD, Wuamett JC, Lantis JC 2nd, et al. Outcomes of combined somatosensory evoked potential, motor evoked potential, and electroencephalography monitoring during carotid endarterectomy [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2014, 28(3): 665-72.
[16]Pennekamp CW, Immink RV, den Ruijter HM, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy can predict the onset of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 34: 314-321.
[17]Wang Y, Li L, Wang TL, et al. The efficacy of near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective, single-center, observational study [J]. Cell Transplant, 2019, 28(2): 170-175.
[18]Bissacco D, Attisani L, Settembrini AM, et al. Modifications in near infrared spectroscopy for cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 79: 239-246.
[19]Uno M, Yagi K, Takai H, et al. Comparison of single and dual monitoring during carotid endarterectomy [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2021, 61(2): 124-133.

相似文献/References:

[1]朝　博 综述　王　涛 审校.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中监测的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):247.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.021]
[2]马廉亭.关于“颈动脉内膜切除术”手术名称的商榷[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):251.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.022]
[3]李利彪　李　鹏　陈冬梅　于建设　韩志强.颈动脉内膜剥脱术中不同麻醉技术的联合应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(05):280.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.008]
　LI Li-biao,LI Peng,CHEN Dong-mei,et al.Application of different techniques of anesthesia to carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses[J].,2015,(12):280.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.008]
[4]张鹏飞　赵立文　汪子文　唐　铸　赵文可　何一川　杨俊丽　于耀宇.内膜斑块剥脱术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):455.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.003]
　ZHANG Peng-fei,ZHAO Li-wen,WANG Zi-wen,et al.Endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J].,2016,(12):455.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.003]
[5]郑铁晋　阚志生　史今盛.老年颈内动脉狭窄血压变化及与脑卒中的关系[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):485.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.014]
[6]李利彪　陈冬梅　郭春燕　于建设　韩志强.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中颈动脉阻断对局部脑氧饱和度的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(09):530.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.007]
　LI Li-biao,CHEN Dong-mei,GUO Chun-yan,et al.Effects of temporary carotid artery occlusion on regional cerebral oxygen saturation during carotid endarterectomy[J].,2016,(12):530.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.007]
[7]唐　冬,陈金华,陈　涛,等.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术横向与纵向皮肤切口术后颅神经损伤比较[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):696.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.014]
[8]杨　丽　张　穗　王　婷.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中的配合及护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(04):262.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.04.022]
[9]姚江伟　李　芸　李树国　姬　翔　赵　博　高　波　赵同源.支架成形术联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄合并颅内动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(11):771.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.11.012]
[10]秦海林　秦　汉　安学锋　別毕洲.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(12):775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.003]
　QIN Hai-lin,QIN Han,AN Xue-feng,et al.Effect of carotid endarterectomy on patients with severe stenosis of internal carotid artery[J].,2018,(12):775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.003]
[11]宋　平　陈晓斌　杜　浩　蔡　强　罗　明　阮　航　吴京雷　段发亮.内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(09):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.006]
　SONG Ping,CHEN Xiao-bin,DU Hao,et al.Clinical analysis of carotid endarterectomy for ischemic stroke[J].,2016,(12):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.006]
[12]董　辉　张　晖　蔡　磊　叶权亿　刘　波.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(08):587.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.08.023]
[13]徐进旺　刘希光　李爱民等.荧光造影辅助下颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(02):121.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.019]
[14]吴小莉　王　波　涂国龙　曹作为　夏　鹰.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术围手术期护理体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(06):469.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.06.021]
[15]张道宝,陈舒,吴虹刚,等.初期开展颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术的经验[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(02):111.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.02.015]
[16]马小二,李俊卿,赵滨,等.CEA治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的时机选择[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(02):120.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.02.019]
[17]雷慧慧,刘亚菲,华莎.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术围手术期的护理经验[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(03):188.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.03.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2022-09-15收稿，2022-10-28修回）
通讯作者：徐国政，E-mail：xu-gz@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-31