[1]何川,杜恒.翼点入路和眶-翼点入路处理前交通动脉瘤的定量解剖学对照研究[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(08):513-516.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.08.010]
　HE Chuan,DU Heng.Quantitative anatomic comparison of pteral approach and orbital-pteral approach during clipping for anterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2023,28(08):513-516.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.08.010]
点击复制

翼点入路和眶-翼点入路处理前交通动脉瘤的定量解剖学对照研究()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年08期
页码:
513-516
栏目:
实验研究
出版日期:
2023-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quantitative anatomic comparison of pteral approach and orbital-pteral approach during clipping for anterior communicating artery aneurysms
文章编号:
1009-153X（2023）08-0513-04
作者:
何川; 杜恒
100730北京，北京协和医院神经外科（何川、杜恒）；519000广东，珠海市中西医结合医院脑外科（何川）；638600四川，华蓥市人民医院神经外科（杜恒）
Author(s):
HE Chuan1; 2;  DU Heng1; 3
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China; 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Zhuhai Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Zhuhai 519000, China; 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Huaying City People's Hospital, Huaying 638600, China
关键词:
前交通动脉动脉瘤; 显微手术解剖; 翼点入路; 眶-翼点入路
Keywords:
Anterior communicating artery aneurysms;  Pterional approach;  Orbitopterional approach;  Anatomy
分类号:
A
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.08.010
文献标志码:
R 743.9; R 651.1+1
摘要:
目的 对比翼点入路和眶-翼点入路处理前交通动脉瘤的显露范围和观察角度，做量化分析，为临床提供参考。方法 应用6例（12侧）成年新鲜灌注尸头模拟手术入路操作，选择前交通动脉复合体为靶点，测量并统计分析显露范围和观察角度。结果 翼点入路显露范围平均为（1.796±0.079）cm2，显露角度平均为（9.586±0.543）°。眶-翼点入路显露范围平均为（2.241±0.062）cm2，显露角度平均为（18.152±0.711）°。眶-翼点入路显露面积和显露角度均明显大于翼点入路（P<0.05）。结论 对无颅内压增高、无脑肿胀、形态简单的前交通动脉动脉瘤，翼点入路是首选入路；但对于复杂前交通动脉动脉瘤如瘤体向下、向后突出以及呈分叶型等，眶-翼点入路手术可减少硬膜内牵拉，显露范围和角度更大，术中显微镜倾斜角度小，可减少脑组织的损害。临床上，建议根据术前含骨窗CTA或3D-DSA进行个体化选择手术入路。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the exposure range and the observation angle of clipping through pterygial approach and orbito-pterygial approach for anterior communicating artery aneurysms and to provide reference for clinic. Methods Six (12 sides) adult fresh perfusion cadaveric heads were simulated by surgery through pterygial approach and orbito-pterygial approach for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Anterior communicating artery complex was selected as the target. The exposure range and the observation angle were measured and analyzed statistically. Results The average exposure range and the average exposure angle of the pterygial approach were (1.796±0.079) cm2 and (9.586±0.543)°, respectively. The average exposure range and the average exposure angle of orbito-pterygal approach were (2.241±0.062) cm2 and (18.152±0.711)°, respectively. The exposure area and the exposure angle of orbito-pterygoid approach were significantly greater than those of pterygoid approach (P<0.05). Conclusions Pterygoid approach is the preferred approach for clipping anterior communicating artery aneurysms without increased intracranial pressure, brain swelling or simple morphology. However, for complex anterior communicating artery aneurysms, such as aneurysmal sac protruding downward and backward, and lobulated aneurysms, orbito-pterygal approach can reduce intradural pull, expose wider range and angle, and reduce intraoperative microscopic tilt angle, which can reduce brain tissue damage. Clinically, it is recommended to individually select surgical approaches based on preoperative CTA with bone window or 3D-DSA.

参考文献/References:

[1]OZONO I, IKAWA F, HIDAKA T, et al. Risk factor for poor outcome in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on post hoc analysis of the modified WFNS scale study [J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 141: e466-e473.
[2]王　莉，施　昭，孔　祥，等. 大脑前动脉A1段发育不良和分叉角度与前交通动脉瘤形成的相关性[J]. 首都医科大学学报，2022，1：61-66.
[3]WANIBUCHI M, FRIEDMAN AH, FUKUSHIMA T. Photo Atlas of Skull Base Dissection: Techniques and Operative Approaches [M]. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2009: 122-143.
[4]张广辉，王玉海. 大脑前动脉A1段及前交通动脉复合体穿支动脉的显微解剖[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志，2018，36（5）：481-485.
[5]亚萨吉尔. 显微神经外科学（2）[M]. 凌锋译. 中国科学技术出版社，2002. 167.
[6]武　高，桂　卉，张　力. 前交通动脉复合体的显微解剖研究[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2017，22（2）：92-94.
[7]CORNELISSEN BMW, SCHNEIDERS JJ, SPRENGERS ME, et al. Aneurysmal parent artery-specific inflow conditions for complete and incomplete circle of Willis configurations [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(5): 910-915.
[8]高树梓，安德柱，仪新锋，等. 经额底纵裂入路前交通动脉复合体的显微解剖研究[J]. 局解手术学杂志，2020，29（5）：354-357.
[9]刘　晟，张　涛，高文波，等. 翼点入路联合部分眶顶和额骨颧突切除治疗前交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的效果分析[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志，2017，14（2）：98-102.
[10]ALAYWAN M, SINDOU M. Fronto-temporal approach with orbito-zygomatic removal: surgical anatomy[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1990, 104(3-4): 79-83.
[11]ANDALUZ N, VAN LOVEREN HR, KELLER JT, et al. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52(5):1140-1149.
[12]RUMALLA K, MITTAL MK. Acute renal failure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: nationwide analysis of hospitalizations in the united states [J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 91: 542-547.
[13]ALVES-BELO JT, MANGUSSI-GOMES J, TRUONG HQ, et al. Lateral transorbital versus endonasal transpterygoid approach to the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus--a comparative anatomic study [J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2019, 16 (5): 600-606.
[14]STURIALE CL, RICCIARDI L, MARCHESE E, et al. Surgical treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: hints and precautions for young cerebrovascular surgeons [J]. J Neurol Surg, 2020, 81(5): 463-471.
[15]JOO MS, PARK DS, MOON CT, et al. Relationship between gyrus rectus resection and cognitive impairment after surgery for ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms [J]. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg, 2016, 18(3): 223-228.
[16]OLIVEIRA MMRD, RAMOS TM, FERRAREZ CE, et al. Development and validation of the Skills Assessment in Microsurgery for Brain Aneurysms (SAMBA) instrument for predicting proficiency in aneurysm surgery [J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, 133(1): 1-7.
[17]张海阳. 不同前交通动脉瘤直回切除范围在前交通动脉瘤患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药，2020，16：67-70，74.

相似文献/References:

[1]冯　力　李中林　纪培志.经大脑前纵裂入路手术夹闭前交通动脉动脉瘤18例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(12):746.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.014]
[2]张　扬　余　舰　晁迎九　魏建军　高　歌　陈　昱　顾大群.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗宽颈前交通动脉动脉瘤的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(08):473.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.08.009]
　ZHANG Yang,YU Jian,CHAO Ying-jiu,et al.Stent-assisted coils embolization of wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms (report of 35 cases)[J].,2015,(08):473.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.08.009]
[3]张显强　刘胜初　杨建雄　廖驭国　罗　捷　杨　华.前交通动脉动脉瘤70例治疗分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(07):422.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.07.013]
[4]殷尚炯　刘洪泉　王洪生　杜秀玉.前交通动脉动脉瘤的显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(09):529.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.006]
　YIN Shang-jiong,LIU Hong-quan,WANG Hong-sheng,et al.Microsurgical management of anterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2015,(08):529.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.006]
[5]袁　欣　窦娴丽　孙　璐　王秋寒　丰育功.前交通动脉动脉瘤夹闭术围手术期的护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(05):301.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.016]
[6]王华松　纵　习　李宗正.微血管多普勒超声监测在前交通动脉动脉瘤夹闭术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):473.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.010]
　WANG Hua-song,ZONG Xi,LI Zong-zheng..Application of intraoperative microvascular Doppler ultrasonography monitoring in clipping anterior communicating areary neurysms[J].,2016,(08):473.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.010]
[7]胡　骁　周林裕　殷汉荣　杨艳如　代永庆.Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞破裂宽颈前交通动脉动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(05):325.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.05.014]
[8]黄进兴,叶敏,李劲松,等.显微手术治疗前交通动脉动脉瘤33例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(07):489.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.014]
[9]杨建龙　胡　焱　徐东为　闫忠军.前交通动脉动脉瘤发生的相关危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(09):636.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.09.009]
　ANG Jian-long,HU Yan,XU Dong-wei,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to pathogenesis of anterior communicating aneurysm[J].,2017,(08):636.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.09.009]
[10]晁迎九、陈　昱、高　歌、张　扬、牛朝诗、魏祥品.颅咽管瘤伴前交通动脉动脉瘤1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(09):672.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.09.023]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2022-06-10收稿，2023-06-30修回）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-31