[1]王娇燕　尹化斌.颈段脊髓前动脉64排螺旋CT血管成像技术的优化[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(05):277-279,283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.007]
　WANG Jiao-yan,YIN Hua-bin..Optimization of the scanning technology of 64-detector spiral CT angiography of cervical anterior spinal artery[J].,2015,(05):277-279,283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.007]
点击复制

颈段脊髓前动脉64排螺旋CT血管成像技术的优化()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
277-279,283
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2015-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Optimization of the scanning technology of 64-detector spiral CT angiography of cervical anterior spinal artery
文章编号:
1009-153X（2015）05-0277-03
作者:
王娇燕　尹化斌
200240 上海，复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院放射科
通讯作者：尹化斌，E-mail：hbyin1961@126.com
Author(s):
WANG Jiao-yan;  YIN Hua-bin.
Department of Radiology, Affilicated Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai City, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China
关键词:
颈段脊髓前动脉; CT血管造影; 扫描延迟时间; 扫描参数; 优化
Keywords:
Cervical anterior spinal artery;  CTA;  Scan delay time;  Scanning technology;  Optimization
分类号:
R 445.3; R 332.81
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨64排螺旋CT血管成像显示颈段脊髓前动脉（ASA）最佳预测扫描延迟时间的技术及扫描参数。方法 将150例患者采用信封法机分成A、B两组。A组90例，根据CT触发阈值（80、100、120、140、160和180 Hu）又分为A1~A6组，采用对比剂自动跟踪技术；B组60例，根据延迟时间至峰值时间（2.4、6和8 s）又分为B1~B4组，采用小剂量测试技术。分析颈段ASA的显示情况,对A、B组中显示率最高的组别计算实际扫描延迟时间，并测量颈4~5层面椎动脉及ASA 的CT值。结果 A组中，CT触发阈值为120 Hu（A3组）时，ASA显示率最高，达73.31%；B组中，延迟时间到峰值时间为4 s（B2组）时，ASA显示率最高，达80.00%。A3和B2组别的实际扫描延迟时间、颈4~5层面椎动脉及ASA 的CT值，差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。B组实际扫描延迟时间个体差异明显（16~36 s），误差达20 s。结论 对比剂自动跟踪技术和小剂量测试技术经优化后均能较好的显示颈段ASA，而小剂量测试技术更能充分体现个体化的原则，可作为首选检查方法。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the optimal scanning techniques to predict the scan-delay-time after the administration of contrast medium and the best scanning parameters of 64-detector spiral CT angiography showing the cervical anterior spinal artery (ASA). Methods One hundred and fifty patients were randomly divided into groups A (n=90) and B (n=60) on the base of Bolus-tracking and Test-bolus technology. Ninety patients in the group A were divided again into 6 subgroups (n=15) according the postcontrast CT scan different threshold and 60 patients in group B were divided again into 4 subgroups (n=15) according the different scan-delay time which peak time plus. The imaging qualities of the cervical ASA were observed and analyzed after the image reconstruction. CT peak values of vertebral artery and ASA on the C4/5 intervertebral plane were measured and compared each other. The actual scan delay time were calculated respectively in the highest display rate subgroups of groups A and B. Results The best threshold of group A was 120 Hu. The best scan delay time of B group was peak time plus 4 s. There was insignificant differences in CT values and actual scan-delay-time between the highest display rate subgroups of groups A and B (P>0.05). But the individual actual-scan-delay-time difference (20 seconds) was significant longer in group B than that in group A. Conclusions Although both the optimized Bolus-tracking technique and the Test-bolus technique have a relative high display rate of ASA with 64-detector spiral CT, the optimized Test-bolus technique may reflect the individual principle better compared to the optimized Bolus-tracking technique and should be used first.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nijenhuis RJ, Jacobs MJ, van Engelshoven JM, et al. MR angiography of the Adamkiewicz artery and anterior radicu- lomedullary vein: postmortem validation[J]. Am J Neurora- diol, 2006, 27(7): 1573-1575.
[2] 杨　华，邹利光，梁开运，等. 颈段脊髓前动脉 64 层 CT 血管成像[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2011，27：1808-1812.
[3] Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Cervical spon- dylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the cur- rent pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devas- tating disorder [J]. Neuroscientist, 2013, 19(4): 409-421.
[4] Sah S, Wang L, Dahal M, et al. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. J Nepal Med Assoc, 2012, 52(188): 172-177.
[5] Fehlings MG, Jha NK, Hewson SM, et al. Is surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy cost-effective? A costutility analysis based on data from the AOSpine North America prospective CSM study [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012, 17(1 Suppl): 89-93.
[6] Alvin MD, Lubelski D, Benzel EC, et al. Ventral fusion versus dorsal fusion: determining the optimal treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(1): E5.
[7] Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(5): 392-400.
[8] Zhao SH, Logan L, Schraedley P, et al. Assessment of the anterior spinal artery and the artery of Adamkiewicz using multi-detector CT angiography [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2009, 122(2):145-149.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘璘琳　于耀宇　余天垒　裴美娟　唐　铸.改良ABCD2评分与头颈部CTA对TIA后脑梗死的预测价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):407.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.006]
　LIU Lin-lin,YU Yao-yu,YU Tian-lei,et al.Values of modified ABCD2 score and cephalocervical CTA to predicting short-term risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack[J].,2016,(05):407.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.006]
[2]韩奖励 　曹作为.CTA影像模拟眶上锁孔入路手术中颈内动脉的显露[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):87.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.009]
　HAN Jiang-li,CAO Zuo-wei..Exposure of the internal carotid artery by surgery via supraorbital keyhole approach simulated on 3D-CTA images[J].,2016,(05):87.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.009]
[3]刘　嘉　陆建平　黄文才.CTA与CE-MRA评价头颈部动脉狭窄的应用价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(01):14.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.01.005]
　LIU Jia,LU Jian-pin,HUANG Wen-cai..Values of CTA and CE-MRA to diagnosis of the intra- and extracranial arteries stenoses[J].,2017,(05):14.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.01.005]
[4]祝　源　孟　亮　樊　文　王跃飞　涂　勤　曾　浪　马廉亭　向伟楚.头部、颈部和胸部穿刺伤成功救治1例并文献复习[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(01):25.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.01.009]
　ZHU Yuan,MENG Liang,FAN Wen,et al.Penetrating trauma of head, neck and chest: a case report and review of the literature[J].,2020,(05):25.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.01.009]
[5]陈　俊　刘　融　邹　雅　周赤忠.基于颅脑CTA的3D打印技术在颅内动脉瘤夹闭术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(08):632.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.08.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 2015-05-30