[1]谭天赐 胡光丽 张小远等.临床医学研究生抑郁与焦虑状况与应对方式的关系[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(02):95-97.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.010]
 TAN Tian-ci,HU Guang-li,ZHANG Xiao-yuan,et al.Status of depression and anxiety in graduates of clinical medicine and its correlation with coping styles for depression and anxiety[J].,2021,26(02):95-97.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.010]
点击复制

临床医学研究生抑郁与焦虑状况与应对方式的关系()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
95-97
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Status of depression and anxiety in graduates of clinical medicine and its correlation with coping styles for depression and anxiety
文章编号:
1009-153X(2021)02-0095-03
作者:
谭天赐 胡光丽 张小远等
510515 广州,南方医科大学卫生管理学院(谭天赐),研究生院(胡光丽、李海燕),公共卫生学院(张小远)
Author(s):
TAN Tian-ci HU Guang-li ZHANG Xiao-yuan et al
1. School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 2. Graduate School of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 3. School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
关键词:
临床医学研究生抑郁焦虑应对方式
Keywords:
Graduates of clinical medicine Depression Anxiety Coping style
分类号:
R 749.99
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨我校临床医学研究生抑郁、焦虑状况与应对方式的关系。方法 采用随机整群抽样的方式抽取我校549名临床医学研究生进行问卷调查,采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和应付方式问卷(CSQ)进行调查。结果 共发放问卷549份,收回有效问卷510份,有效率为92.9%。本次调查结果显示临床医学研究生抑郁、焦虑检出率分别为24.71%、16.67%。SDS评分(46.48±10.1)和SSA评分(40.4±9.77)均明显高于全国常模[SDS评分为(46.48±10.1)分、SAS评分为(40.4±9.77)分;P<0.05]。抑郁、焦虑与解决问题、求助等应对方式呈负相关(P<0.05),与自责、幻想、退避及合理化等应对方式呈正相关(P<0.05)。多元逐步回归分析显示,解决问题等应对方式有助于缓解抑郁与焦虑,而自责、求助和幻想等应对方式明显加重抑郁与焦虑。结论 我校临床医学研究生抑郁和焦虑水平高于一般人群,且抑郁和焦虑与应对方式密切相关。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the status of depression and anxiety in the graduates of clinical medicine and its relationship with the coping styles for depression and anxiety. Methods Cluster random sampling was used to select 549 graduates of clinical medicine from Southern Medical University for questionnaire surveys. The questionnaires included self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and coping style questionnaire (CSQ). Results A total of 549 questionnaires were issued and 510 were valid questionnaires, with an effective rate of 92.9%. The results of this survey showed that the detection rates of depression and anxiety in clinical medicine graduate students were 24.71% and 16.67%, respectively. SDS score [(46.48±10.1) points] and SSA score [(40.4±9.77) points] were significantly higher than the national norm [SDS score of (46.48±10.1) points, SAS score of (40.4±9.77) points; P<0.05]. Depression and anxiety were signifcantly negatively correlated with coping styles such as problem solving and help seeking (P<0.05), and signifcantly positively correlated with coping styles such as self-blame, fantasy, withdrawal, and rationalization (P<0.05). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that coping styles such as problem solving signifcantly relieved the depression and anxiety, while coping styles such as self-blame, help seeking, and fantasy significantly aggravated the depression and anxiety. Conclusion The level of depression and anxiety of clinical medical graduates in our school is higher than that of the general population, and the depression and anxiety are closely related to coping styles.

参考文献/References:

[1] 苏 红,陈俊国. 我国医学硕士研究生心理素质的调查与评估[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2017,39(4):394-400.
[2] Shao R, He P, Ling B, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety and correlations between depression, anxiety, familyfunctioning, social support and coping styles among Chinesemedical students [J]. BMC Psychol, 2020, 8(1): 38.
[3] Quek TT, Tam WW, Tran BX, et al. The global prevalence of anxiety among medical students: a meta-analysis [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(15): 2735.
[4] 汪向东,王希林,马 弘. 心理卫生量表评定手册[M]. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.
[5] 严梦琴,肖水源,胡 宓. 我国一些抑郁量表的中文翻译与信效度问题[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2016,30(7):501-505.
[6] 周永安. 焦虑自评量表在我国高校大学生中应用的评价研究[D]. 南方医科大学,2012.
[7] 肖计划,许秀峰. “应付方式问卷”效度与信度研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):164-168.
[8] 张凤梅,陈建文,徐恒戬. 山东某高校大学生焦虑抑郁状况分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2014,41(13):2399-2400.
[9] 马 慧,杨 超,刘 娜,等. 大学生抑郁症状与人格特征及应对方式的关系研究[J]. 中国健康教育,2019,35(2):179-181.
[10] 陆斯琦. 临床医生领悟社会支持与焦虑、抑郁相关性研究[J]. 中国职业医学,2018,45(1):71-74.
[11] 李 琰,白春杰,陈丽霞. 临床失眠患者应对方式与焦虑、抑郁的相关性[J]. 中国临床研究,2020,33(1):102-105.
[12] 邢 超,屠春雨,谈荣梅,等. 青少年应对方式与抑郁焦虑情绪的关联[J]. 中国学校卫生,2011,32(12):1449-1451.
[13] 李小玲,唐海波,明庆森,等. 大学生孤独感和自我和谐的关系:应对方式的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(3):530-532.
[14] 宋 蕊,李 曼. 社会支持与中学生抑郁的关系:应对方式和心理弹性的链式中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志,2020,28(9):1392-1397.
[15] 高 爽,张向葵,徐晓林. 大学生自尊与心理健康的元分析——以中国大学生为样本[J]. 心理科学进展,2015,23(9):1499-1507.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 伟,刘 永,王为文,等.坦度螺酮治疗癫痫伴焦虑、抑郁效果的系统评价[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(04):200.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.004]
 ZHANG Wei,LIU Yong,WANG Wei-wen,et al.Meta analysis of curative effect of tandospirone on epileptic patients with depression and anxiety[J].,2019,(02):200.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.004]
[2]何 蓓 张 鹏 宋建荣 吕新文 周小龙 蔡 珂 朱 峰 张 超.麻醉方式对手术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿疗效的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(11):703.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.11.023]
[3]刘孟丽 杨喜霞 曾织帜 赵 敏 李露寒.早期心理护理对脑卒中病人抑郁及神经功能恢复的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(09):716.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.09.021]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:广东省学位与研究生教育改革项目(2019JGXM23);广东省研究生教育创新计划项目(2016JGXM—ZD—21)
通讯作者:李海燕,E-mail:lhy@smu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-25