[1]张施远　廖　进　蒋永明.原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术中困难减压的处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(10):772-775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.009]
　ZHANG Shi-yuan,LIAO Jin,JIANG Yong-ming.Treatment of difficult decompression during micro-vascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2021,26(10):772-775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.009]
点击复制

原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术中困难减压的处理()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年10期
页码:
772-775
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment of difficult decompression during micro-vascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia
文章编号:
1009-153X（2021）10-0772-04
作者:
张施远　廖　进　蒋永明
作者单位：629000 四川，遂宁市中心医院神经外科（张施远、廖　进、蒋永明）
Author(s):
ZHANG Shi-yuan;  LIAO Jin;  JIANG Yong-ming
Department of Neurosurgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining 629000, China
关键词:
原发性三叉神经痛; 微血管减压术; 困难减压
Keywords:
Primary trigeminal neuralgia;  Microvascular decompression;  Difficult decompression
分类号:
A
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.009
文献标志码:
R 745.1+1; R 651.1+1
摘要:
目的 探讨原发性三叉神经痛（PTN）微血管减压术（MVD）出现困难减压的处理方法以及疗效。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2019年12月采用MVD治疗的408例PTN的临床资料。术中出现困难减压56例，常规减压352例。对于困难减压病人，综合采取包括安置腰大池引流、神经内镜辅助、扩大松解桥小脑角区蛛网膜粘连、经小脑水平裂-小脑桥脑裂入路解剖显露，以及“架桥”等方法妥善处理。结果 术后随访0.5~5年。常规减压组术后即刻缓解37例，延迟缓解14例，无效5例；困难减压组术后即刻缓解267例，延迟缓解62例，无效23例。常规减压组术后即刻缓解率（75.85%，267/352）与困难减压组（66.07%，37/56）无统计学差异（P>0.05），常规减压组术后有效率（93.54%，329/352）与困难减压组（91.07%，51/56）无统计学差异（P>0.05）。常规减压组术后总并发症发生率（7.7%，27/352）与困难减压组（10.7%，16/56）无统计学差异（P>0.05）。两组均无手术死亡病例及严重后遗症。结论 PTN病人MVD中出现的困难减压并不是影响MVD疗效的决定性因素，只要术中处理得当，困难减压病人术后也可以取得很好的疗效。术前应熟悉和掌握常见的困难减压的应对方法，并且秉持适可而止的理念，减少手术并发症，可进一步提高手术疗效。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the treatment methods and their efficacies for the patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) under the condition of difficult decompression during microvascular decompression (MVD). Methods The clinical data of 408 PTN patients who underwent MVD from January 2013 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Of 408 PTN patients, 56 suffered from the condition of difficult decompression during MVD (difficult group) and 352 patients receiced the conventional decompression (convertional groups). For the patients in difficult group, comprehensive measures, including placement of lumbar cistern drainage, neuroendoscopy assistance, enlargement and release of arachnoid adhesions in the cerebellopontine angle area, anatomical exposure through the horizontal split-cerebellopontine split approach, and "bridging", were used to treat various types of difficult decompression. Results All the patient were followed up for 0.5~5 years. In difficult group, 37 patients had immediate remission, 14 delayed remission, and 5 no effect. In conventional group, 267 patients had immediate remission, 62 delayed remission, and 23 no effect. There was no statistical differences in immediate remission rate [75.85%(267/352) vs. 66.07% (37/56)], effective rate [93.54%(329/352) vs. 91.07%(51/56)] and total postoperative complication rate [7.7%(27/352) vs. 10.7%(16/56)] between conventional and difficult groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The difficult decompression in MVD for PTN patients is not a decisive factor affecting the efficacy of MVD, and good outcomes can also be achieved as the measures are used properly. Before surgery, we should be familiar with and master the common difficult decompression response methods, and uphold the concept of affordable treatment, which can reduce the surgical complications and improve the surgical efficacy.

参考文献/References:

[1] 于炎冰，张　黎. 中国显微血管减压术治疗脑神经疾患术中减压处理措施及其疗效分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2016，32（10）：976-977.
[2] 于炎冰. 显微血管减压术[M]. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2015. 27-37.
[3] 邢亚洲，王新军，梁庆华. 面肌痉挛微血管减压术中困难减压的处理措施及其疗效分析[J]. 中华神经医学杂志，2017，16（8）：831-835.
[4] Brisman R. Gamma kniferadiosurgery for primary managet-fortrigeminal neuralgia [J]. J Neurosurg, 2000, 93: 159-162.
[5] Jannetta PJ, Mclaughlin MR, Casey KF. Technique of microvascular decompression [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2005, 18(5): 1-5.
[6] 赵有让，于炎冰，张　黎，等. 显微血管减压术后的死亡原因及危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2017，33（2）：154-159.
[7] 任崇文，曲春城，王志刚，等. 三叉神经痛责任血管术中判定及手术疗效[J]. 中华医学杂志，2013，93（19）：1482-1485.
[8] 赵卫国，濮春华，蔡　瑜，等. 1002例颅神经疾病微血管减压手术疗效和并发症分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版），2006，26（7）：778-780.
[9] 王　强，周　强，夏锡伟，等. 微血管减压术治疗椎动脉相关性面肌痉挛的疗效分析[J]. 临床神经外科杂志，2016，13（5）：364-367.
[10] 杨　超，冯慧宇，刘金龙，等. 单责任血管和多责任血管三叉神经痛微血管减压术的疗效比较[J]. 中华神经医学杂志，2016，15（9）：918-922.
[11] 马　凯，李勇杰，胡永生，等. 三叉神经痛显微血管减压术中岩静脉处理策略的研究[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2015,31（1）：44-47.
[12] 杨玉明，王作伟，崔　壮，等. 三叉神经微血管减压术岩静脉特点及处理方法探讨[J]. 中华医学杂志，2017，97（7）：522-524.
[13] 郑　鲁，楚燕飞，姚智强，等. 经小脑水平裂-小脑桥脑裂处理阻碍三叉神经痛手术入路的岩静脉[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志，2010，23（5）：262-265.

相似文献/References:

[1]杜　浩　黄　河　宋　健　何远志　孙荣辉　丁慧超　姚　顺　徐国政.面肌痉挛微血管减压术后并发症的相关危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):267.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.004]
　DU Hao,HUANG He,SONG Jian,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to complications after microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm[J].,2016,(10):267.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.004]
[2]申彦杰　宋　健　成文平　程东亮.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛57例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):238.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.016]
[3]黄　进　吴祥奎　张岩松　邵君飞.肌电图监测在面肌痉挛微血管减压术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):164.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.011]
　HUANG Jin,WU Xiang-kui,ZHANG Yan-song,et al.Application of EMG monitoring to microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].,2016,(10):164.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.011]
[4]曾　冉　王飞红　袁邦清　杨　光　苏同刚.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):175.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.016]
[5]蒋　伟　孙守家　高　攀　张晓静　舒　凯　雷　霆　李　龄.异常椎基底动脉压迫致三叉神经痛的临床特点及显微手术治疗（附16例分析）[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):69.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.002]
　JIANG Wei,SUN Shou-jia,GAO Pan,et al.Clinical features and microsurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused by abnormal vertebrobasilar artery compression (report of 16 cases)[J].,2016,(10):69.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.002]
[6]宋　健　刘　敏　丁慧超　杜　浩　向伟楚　黄　成　黄　河　孙荣辉　何远志　徐国政　马廉亭.术前MRI与Dyna-CTA三维影像融合对微血管减压术难易程度的评估价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(10):597.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.007]
　SONG Jian,LIU Min,DING Hui-chao,et al.Value of preoperative MRI and Dyna-CTA 3D-imaging fusion to microvascular decompression[J].,2015,(10):597.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.007]
[7]向兴刚　张永辉　李大志　昝向阳　于晓晨　蔡　宁　赵　永　林　琳.神经内镜辅助微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(10):624.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.015]
[8]吴广源　尹　卫　郑思阳　齐　辉.自体颅骨碎屑一期修复颅神经微血管减压术骨窗的临床观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):364.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.06.016]
[9]卫永旭　杨文磊　赵卫国　李　宁　蔡　瑜　濮春华　吴哲褒.肌松药对面肌痉挛微血管减压术中电生理监测的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(09):526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.005]
　WEI Yong-xu,YANG Wen-lei,ZHAO Wei-guo,et al.Effect of muscle relaxants on lateral spread responses during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].,2015,(10):526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.005]
[10]耿　飞.枕下乙状窦后入路微血管减压治疗面肌痉挛的并发症及处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):168.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.014]
[11]荣道建　何　颖　杨晓健　赵　骞　赵俊伟　杨　峰.三维时间飞跃法磁共振血管成像在原发性三叉神经痛诊治中的临床价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):241.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.018]
[12]何少宇,李　玉,李　杨,等.原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术中岩静脉的处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):747.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.005]
　HE Shao-yu,LI Yu,LI Yang,et al.Management of petrosal vein in microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2016,(10):747.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.005]
[13]耿亮,王义宝,王占福.微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛126例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(02):95.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.011]
[14]罗　波 范润金 张　逵 尚　彬 刘　毅 唐晓平.全程围套式微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(10):687.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.005]
　LUO Bo,FAN Rui-jin,ZHANG Kui,et al.Clinical analysis of the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia by whole-range encircling method of microvascular decompression[J].,2017,(10):687.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.005]
[15]郑　玺.微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛65例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(06):429.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.06.016]
[16]侯前亮.“补片悬吊法”微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛 的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(12):810.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.017]
[17]王　飞　张　挺　廖毓芝　袁　磊　王兆伟　张保中.不同类型原发性三叉神经痛的手术疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):10.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.002]
　WANG Fei,ZHANG Ting,LIAO Yu-zhi,et al.Analysis of curative effect of surgery on primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2019,(10):10.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.002]
[18]张文斗,范　波,胡会敏,等.原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术后复发的影响因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(04):221.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.010]
　ZHANG Wen-dou,FAN Bo,HU Hui-min,et al.Factors related to recurrence of primary trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression[J].,2019,(10):221.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.010]
[19]孙红山　赵帅杰　王昊天　闵有会.显微血管减压术联合三叉神经感觉根部分切断术治疗伴静脉压迫的原发性三叉神经痛[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(08):498.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.08.017]
[20]逯德胜　陈　亮　逯莞婷　展群岭.神经内镜下和显微镜下微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛疗效的meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(10):602.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.09.004]
　LU De-sheng,CHEN Liang,LU Wan-ting,et al.Meta-analysis of neuroendoscopic microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2019,(10):602.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.09.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者：蒋永明，E-mail：jiangym123@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01