[1]王在贵,管江衡,徐国政,等.合并颅骨缺损的脑积水病人分流术后反常性脑疝的诊治分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(06):365-368.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.06.004]
　WANG Zai-gui,GUAN Jiang-heng,XU Guo-zheng,et al.Diagnosis and treatment of paradoxical herniation after cerebrospinal fluid shunt in patients with hydrocephalus associated with large skull defect[J].,2023,28(06):365-368.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.06.004]
点击复制

合并颅骨缺损的脑积水病人分流术后反常性脑疝的诊治分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
365-368
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnosis and treatment of paradoxical herniation after cerebrospinal fluid shunt in patients with hydrocephalus associated with large skull defect
文章编号:
1009-153X（2023）06-0365-04
作者:
王在贵; 管江衡; 徐国政; 甘志强; 宋健
430070武汉，中部战区总医院神经外科（王在贵、管江衡、徐国政、甘志强、宋健）
Author(s):
WANG Zai-gui;  GUAN Jiang-heng;  XU Guo-zheng;  GAN Zhi-qiang;  SONG Jian
Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430070, China
关键词:
反常性脑疝; 大面积颅骨缺损; 脑积水; 分流术; 颅骨成形术
Keywords:
Paradoxical herniation;  Large skull defect;  Hydrocephalus;  Shunt surgery;  Cranioplasty
分类号:
A
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.06.004
文献标志码:
R 742.7; R 651.1+1
摘要:
目的 探讨合并大面积颅骨缺损的脑积水病人分流术后反常性脑疝的临床特征及诊治方案。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月收治的8例合并大面积颅骨缺损的脑积水分病人的临床资料。结果 8例均为交通性脑积水，其中高颅压性脑积水2例，正常压力或低压力性脑积水6例。8例均行脑室-腹腔分流术，分流管选择可调压分流阀+重力辅助阀/抗虹吸阀，术后2周内出现反常性脑疝，其中7例上调分流阀压力后反常性脑疝临床表现消失；1例上调分流阀压力至200 mmH2O仍存在反常性脑疝临床表现，行颅骨成形术后缓解。5例行颅骨成形术，术后下调分流阀压力。结论 合并大面积颅骨缺损的脑积水，不恰当的分流阀初始压力设置可导致反常性脑疝，建议此类脑积水病人选择可调压分流阀+重力辅助阀/抗虹吸阀，因为通过上调分流阀压力可及时治疗反常性脑疝。颅骨成形为改善反常性脑疝病人预后的有效方法，同时成形术后应根据病人具体情况及时调整分流阀压力。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of paradoxical herniation after cerebrospinal fluid shunt in patients with hydrocephalus associated with large skull defect. Methods The clinical data of 8 patients with hydrocephalus associated with large skull defect who were admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Results All the patients suffered from communicating hydrocephalus, including 2 patients with high cranial pressure hydrocephalus and 6 with normal or low pressure hydrocephalus. All patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and the adjustable pressure shunt valve+gravity auxiliary valve/anti-siphon valve were used in all the patients. Paradoxical herniation occurred in all the patients within 2 week after shunt. The clinical manifestations of paradoxical herniation disappeared after the shunt valve pressure was raised in 7 patients, and the clinical manifestations of paradoxical herniation were still present in 1 patient after the shunt valve pressure was raised to 200 mmH2O, which were relieved after cranioplasty. Five patients underwent cranioplasty, and the shunt valve pressure was reduced after operation. Conclusions In the patients with hydrocephalus associted with large skull defect undergoing cerebrospinal fluid shunt, improper initial pressure setting of the shunting valve may cause paradoxical herniation. The adjustable pressure shunting valve+gravity auxiliary valve/anti-siphon valve is recommended for these patients, because the paradoxical herniation can be treated in time by increasing the pressure of the shunting valve. Cranioplasty is an effective method to improve the prognoses of patients with paradoxical herniation, and the shunt valve pressure should be adjusted in time according to the specific conditions of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]张宏兵，祁　飞，张荣军，等. 颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后并发脑积水的治疗体会[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（6）：491-492.
[2]向军武，常静静，刘　宇，等. 重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后并发脑积水的危险因素[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（8）：676-677.
[3]李　龙，杨金庆，薛　勇，等. 颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后脑积水危险因素分析及分流时机[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2020，25（9）：600-602.
[4]Nasi D, Dobran M, Iacoangeli M, et al. Paradoxical brain herniatior after decompressive craniectomy provoked by drainage of subdurahygroma [J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 91(4): 673.el-673.e4.
[5]Hiruta R, Jinguji S, Sato T, et al. Acute paradoxical brain herniation after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a case report [J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2019, 10: 79.
[6]Bender PD, Brown AEC. Head of the bed down: paradoxical management for paradoxical herniation [J]. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med, 2019, 3(3): 208-210.
[7]姚国杰，于　多，杜　威. 脑室-腹腔分流术后并发症的诊疗路径探讨[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（11）：957-960.
[8]于　多，杜　威，陈大瑜，等. 脑室-腹腔分流术失败的原因及对策分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（7）：551-554.
[9]陈红伟，解东成，王圣杰，等. 儿童脑积水分流术后并发症的原因分析及对策[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（3）：193-194.
[10]李长栋，蔡志标，周　杰，等. 反常性脑疝3例报道及文献复习[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（5）：384-386.
[11]Schwab S, Erbguth F, Aschoff A, et al. Paradoxical herniation after decompressive trephining [J]. Nervenarzt, 1998, 69(10): 896-900.
[12]简志宏，刘　佳，刘仁忠，等. 去大骨瓣减压术后腰穿诱发反常性脑症[J]. 武汉大学学报（医学版），2017，38（6）：998-1001.
[13]蓝佛琳，沈东炜，胡方进，等. 去骨瓣减压术后过度腰大池引流致反常性脑疝11例[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志，2017，43（10）：620-623.
[14]张　俊，张恒柱，董　伦，等. 单侧去骨瓣减压术后并发反常性脑疝诊疗探讨[J]. 临床神经外科杂志，2021，18（6）：679-682.
[15]张　毅，柏鲁宁，柯尊华，等. 重型颅脑损伤病人术后脑积水形成相关因素分析[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志，2013，39（9）：519-522.
[16]邢　岩，毛任玲，李延峰. 特发性正常压力脑积水临床管理中国共识（2022）[J]. 中华老年医学杂志，2022，41（2）：123-134.
[17]Ting CW, Lu CH, Lan CM, et al. Simultaneous cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement inpatients with traumatic brain injury undergoing unilateral decompressive craniectomy [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2020, 79: 45-50.
[18]Yang XF, Wang H, Wen L, et al. The safety of simultaneous cranioplasty and shunt implantation [J]. Brain Inj, 2017, 31: 1651-1655.
[19]Meyer RM, Morton RP, Abecassis IJ, et al. Risk of complications with simultaneous cranioplasty and placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunt [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 107: 830-833.

相似文献/References:

[1]李长栋,蔡志标,周杰,等.反常性脑疝3例报道及文献复习[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(05):384.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.05.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2023-03-25收稿，2023-05-21修回）
通讯作者：甘志强，E-mail：ganzhiqiang315@163.com
宋　健，E-mail：songjian0505@smu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-30