[1]师忠杰 高 鑫 范超凡等.3D Slicer三维重建影像在微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(11):827-829.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.003]
 SHI Zhong-jie,FAN Chao-fan,GAO Xin,et al.Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of MRI images using 3D Slicer software in microvascular decompression for patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2021,26(11):827-829.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.003]
点击复制

3D Slicer三维重建影像在微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛中的应用()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
827-829
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of MRI images using 3D Slicer software in microvascular decompression for patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia
文章编号:
1009-153X(2021)11-0827-03
作者:
师忠杰 高 鑫 范超凡等
361000 福建厦门,厦门大学附属第一医院神经外科(师忠杰、高 鑫、范超凡、刘希尧、肖德勇、谭国伟、王占祥)
Author(s):
SHI Zhong-jie FAN Chao-fan GAO Xin et al
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, China
关键词:
原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术磁共振成像三维影重建3D Slicer3D-TOF-MRA3D-FIESTA
Keywords:
Primary trigeminal neuralgia Microvascular decompression 3D Slicer Three-dimensional reconstruction MRI
分类号:
R 845.1+1; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨基于磁共振3D-TOF-MRA及3D-FIESTA序列的3D Slicer三维重建影像在微血管减压术(MVD)治疗原发性三叉神经痛(PTN)中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年10月MVD治疗的58例PTN的临床资料。术前均行3.0 T颅脑磁共振3D-TOF-MRA及3D-FIESTA扫描,利用3D Slicer软件进行三维影像重建,以评估神经与血管的关系,并制定手术方案。以术中所见为判断神经与血管关系的金标准。结果 3D-TOF-MRA和3D-FIESTA判断责任血管的准确率分别为77.59%(45/58),81.03%(47/58),与术中发现的一致性Kappa值分别为0.753、0.762。三维重建影像判断责任血管的准确率为93.10%(54/58),与术中发现的一致性Kappa值为0.882。三维重建影像判断责任血管的准确率明显优于3D-TOF-MRA和3D-FIESTA(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,术前三维重建影像评估神经受压程度的曲线下面积为0.94(P<0.05)。术后47例疼痛缓解,总有效率为81%(47/58);11例症状未见明显改善,但无加重。出院后随访3~6个月,11例无改善病人中,2例出院1个月有改善,9例无改善、无加重;其余47例无复发。结论 基于3D-TOF-MRA及3D-FIESTA的3D Slicer三维重建影像,可以在术前很好地判断神经与血管的关系及神经受压程度,和术中观察具有很好的一致性,对MVD治疗PTN的术前规划具有重要价值。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application value of three-dimensional reconstruction of MRI images using 3D Slicer software in microvascular decompression (MVD) for the patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN). Methods The clinical data of 58 patients with PTN who underwent MVD from January 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Before the operation, 3.0 T magnetic resonance 3D-TOF-MRA and 3D-FIESTA scans were performed on all the patients, and 3D slicer software was used for three-dimensional reconstruction to evaluate the relationship between the trifacial nerves and their offending vessels and to formulate the surgical plans. Intraoperative findings were served as the gold standard for judging the relationship between the trifacial nerves and their offending vessels. Results The accuracy rates of 3D-TOF-MRA and 3D-FIESTA in judging the offending vessels were 77.59% (45/58) and 81.03% (47/58), respectively. The Kappa values of 3D-TOF-MRA and 3D-FIESTA?consistent with those found during the operation were 0.753 and 0.762, respectively. The accuracy of the three-dimensional reconstructed images to determine the offending vessels was 93.10% (54/58), and the Kappa value was 0.882. The accuracy rate of the three-dimensional reconstruction image to judge the offending vessel was significantly higher than those of 3D-TOF-MRA and 3D-FIESTA (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction images to assess the degree of nerve compression was 0.94 (P<0.05). After the operation, pain relief was achieved in 47 patients (81%, 47/58) and no significant improvement in 11. Follow-up (3~6 months) showed that 2 of 11 patients with no improvement had improvement within 1 month after the discharge, 9 of 11 patients had no improvement or aggravation; the other 47 patients had no recurrence. Conclusions Three-dimensional reconstruction of MRI images using 3D Slicer software can fully differentiate the relationship between the trifacial nerves and their offending vessels, which is of great value in the preoperative planning of MVD for PTN patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李 强,于炎冰,张 黎. 三叉神经痛的疼痛范围与神经血管压迫位置的关系研究[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2020,19(11):1098-1103.
[2] 张 琼,卢思言,苗重昌. 原发性三叉神经痛的诊断与治疗进展[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,25(6):411-413.
[3] 于炎冰. 三叉神经痛的外科治疗:医生如何抉择可使患者最终受益[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2020,19(11):1081-1084.
[4] Lu W, Wang H, Yan Z, et al. Microvascular decompression for the treatment of neurogenic hypertension with trigeminal neuralgia [J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 341.
[5] 秦 瑜,和华元,马 建,等. 原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术后面部麻木的危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,25(11):783-784.
[6] 马召儒,王晓嵩,魏晓明,等. 显微血管减压术治疗老年原发性三叉神经痛的疗效[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,25(8):554-555.
[7] Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, et al. Microvascular de-compression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 con-secutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression [J]. J Neurosurg, 2007, 107(6): 1144.
[8] 杨吉鹏,邱 翔,李晓瞳. 3D Slicer软件在乙状窦后入路开颅术中的应用[J]. 脑与神经疾病杂志,2021,29(2):97-101.
[9] Nandish S, Prabhu G, Rajagopal KV. Multiresolution image registration for multimodal brain images and fusion for better neurosurgical planning [J]. Biomed J, 2017, 40(6): 329-338.
[10] Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network [J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 30(9): 1323-134.
[11] 焦迎斌,段 峰,闫志勇,等. 3D-TOF-MRA和3D-FIESTA三维融合图像在判断原发性三叉神经痛责任血管中的作用[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2019,35(9):928-932.
[12] 郭 楠,秦 响,汪秀玲. MRI 3D-TOF联合3D-FIESTA对原发性三叉神经痛三叉神经形态学和疼痛程度相关性的研究[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建,2021,16(1):48-50.
[13] 齐 猛,孙 澎,陆 夏,等. 术前3D-CISS联合3D-TOF序列MRI判断原发性三叉神经痛责任血管的效果[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,22(10):684-686.
[14] 刘 嘉,陆建平,黄文才. CTA与CE-MRA评价头颈部动脉狭窄的应用价值[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,22(1):14-16.
[15] 栗志弘,康 凯,赵德强. 数字三维重建影像在神经外科手术规划中的应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,22(2):118-119.

相似文献/References:

[1]杜 浩 黄 河 宋 健 何远志 孙荣辉 丁慧超 姚 顺 徐国政.面肌痉挛微血管减压术后并发症的相关危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):267.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.004]
 DU Hao,HUANG He,SONG Jian,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to complications after microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm[J].,2016,(11):267.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.004]
[2]申彦杰 宋 健 成文平 程东亮.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛57例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):238.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.016]
[3]黄 进 吴祥奎 张岩松 邵君飞.肌电图监测在面肌痉挛微血管减压术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):164.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.011]
 HUANG Jin,WU Xiang-kui,ZHANG Yan-song,et al.Application of EMG monitoring to microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].,2016,(11):164.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.011]
[4]曾 冉 王飞红 袁邦清 杨 光 苏同刚.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):175.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.016]
[5]蒋 伟 孙守家 高 攀 张晓静 舒 凯 雷 霆 李 龄.异常椎基底动脉压迫致三叉神经痛的临床特点及显微手术治疗(附16例分析)[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):69.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.002]
 JIANG Wei,SUN Shou-jia,GAO Pan,et al.Clinical features and microsurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused by abnormal vertebrobasilar artery compression (report of 16 cases)[J].,2016,(11):69.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.002]
[6]宋 健 刘 敏 丁慧超 杜 浩 向伟楚 黄 成 黄 河 孙荣辉 何远志 徐国政 马廉亭.术前MRI与Dyna-CTA三维影像融合对微血管减压术难易程度的评估价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(10):597.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.007]
 SONG Jian,LIU Min,DING Hui-chao,et al.Value of preoperative MRI and Dyna-CTA 3D-imaging fusion to microvascular decompression[J].,2015,(11):597.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.007]
[7]向兴刚 张永辉 李大志 昝向阳 于晓晨 蔡 宁 赵 永 林 琳.神经内镜辅助微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(10):624.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.015]
[8]吴广源 尹 卫 郑思阳 齐 辉.自体颅骨碎屑一期修复颅神经微血管减压术骨窗的临床观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):364.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.06.016]
[9]卫永旭 杨文磊 赵卫国 李 宁 蔡 瑜 濮春华 吴哲褒.肌松药对面肌痉挛微血管减压术中电生理监测的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(09):526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.005]
 WEI Yong-xu,YANG Wen-lei,ZHAO Wei-guo,et al.Effect of muscle relaxants on lateral spread responses during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].,2015,(11):526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.005]
[10]耿 飞.枕下乙状窦后入路微血管减压治疗面肌痉挛的并发症及处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):168.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.014]
[11]荣道建 何 颖 杨晓健 赵 骞 赵俊伟 杨 峰.三维时间飞跃法磁共振血管成像在原发性三叉神经痛诊治中的临床价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):241.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.018]
[12]何少宇,李 玉,李 杨,等.原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术中岩静脉的处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):747.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.005]
 HE Shao-yu,LI Yu,LI Yang,et al.Management of petrosal vein in microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2016,(11):747.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.005]
[13]耿亮,王义宝,王占福.微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛126例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(02):95.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.011]
[14]罗 波 范润金 张 逵 尚 彬 刘 毅 唐晓平.全程围套式微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(10):687.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.005]
 LUO Bo,FAN Rui-jin,ZHANG Kui,et al.Clinical analysis of the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia by whole-range encircling method of microvascular decompression[J].,2017,(11):687.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.005]
[15]郑 玺.微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛65例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(06):429.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.06.016]
[16]侯前亮.“补片悬吊法”微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛 的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(12):810.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.017]
[17]王 飞 张 挺 廖毓芝 袁 磊 王兆伟 张保中.不同类型原发性三叉神经痛的手术疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):10.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.002]
 WANG Fei,ZHANG Ting,LIAO Yu-zhi,et al.Analysis of curative effect of surgery on primary trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2019,(11):10.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.002]
[18]张文斗,范 波,胡会敏,等.原发性三叉神经痛微血管减压术后复发的影响因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(04):221.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.010]
 ZHANG Wen-dou,FAN Bo,HU Hui-min,et al.Factors related to recurrence of primary trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression[J].,2019,(11):221.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.010]
[19]孙红山 赵帅杰 王昊天 闵有会.显微血管减压术联合三叉神经感觉根部分切断术治疗伴静脉压迫的原发性三叉神经痛[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(08):498.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.08.017]
[20]逯德胜 陈 亮 逯莞婷 展群岭.神经内镜下和显微镜下微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛疗效的meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(10):602.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.09.004]
 LU De-sheng,CHEN Liang,LU Wan-ting,et al.Meta-analysis of neuroendoscopic microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia[J].,2019,(11):602.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.09.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01