[1]肖亚杰申杨勇陈京峰崇辉.单侧双通道内镜手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症安全性的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(02):85-89.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.02.007]
　XIAO Ya-jie,SHEN Yang-yong,CHEN Jing-feng,et al.Safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a Metaanalysis[J].,2022,27(02):85-89.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.02.007]
点击复制

单侧双通道内镜手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症安全性的Meta分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
85-89
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a Metaanalysis
文章编号:
1009-153X（2022）02-0085-05
作者:
肖亚杰申杨勇陈京峰崇辉
100091 北京，中国中医科学院西苑医院骨科（肖亚杰、申杨勇、陈京峰、崇辉）
Author(s):
XIAO Ya-jie;  SHEN Yang-yong;  CHEN Jing-feng;  CHONG Hui.
Department of Orthopedics, Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese, Beijig 100091, China
关键词:
腰椎管狭窄症; 单侧双通道内镜手术; 显微镜下椎管减压术; 并发症; Meta分析
Keywords:
Lumbar spinal stenosis;  Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy;  Microendoscopic discectomy;  Complications;  Meta analysis
分类号:
R 681.1+5; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.02.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 系统分析单侧双通道内镜手术（UBE）与显微镜下椎管减压术（MED）治疗腰椎管狭窄症的安全性。方法计算机检索Pubmed、Cochrane library、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase等英文数据库，以及中国知网和万方中文数据库。纳入UBE和MED治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床随机对照试验（RCT）及队列研究。观察指标包括总并发症发生率，以及硬膜外血肿、神经根损伤、硬膜囊损伤、减压不彻底、因相关并发症再次手术发生率。采用Revman 5.3 软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入7篇相关研究，包括2篇RCT、5篇队列研究；共纳入475例病人，其中UBE有248例，MED有227例。Meta分析显示两种手术方法的总并发症发生率以及硬膜外血肿、神经根损伤、硬膜囊损伤、减压不彻底、因相关并发症再次手术等并发症发生率均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论UBE与MED治疗腰椎管狭窄症在安全性方面基本一致。
Abstract:
Objective To systematically analyze the incidence of complications related to unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods The English databases including Pubmed, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase, and Chinese databases including CNKI and Wanfang were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies of UBE and MED in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Observational parameters included the total incidence of complications, and the incidence of epidural hematoma, nerve root injury, dural sac injury, incomplete decompression, and reoperation due to related complications. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software. Results Seven studies were finally included, including 2 RCTs and 5 cohort studies. A total of 475 patients were included, including 248 patients with UBE and 227 patients with MED. Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the total complication rates, and the rates of epidural hematoma, nerve root injury, dural sac injury, incomplete decompression and reoperation due to related complications of the two surgical methods (P>0.05). Conclusions There is no statistical difference in the safety of UBE and MED in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Hall S, Bartleson JD, Onofrio BM, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis, clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients [J]. Ann Intern Med, 1985, 103: 271-275.
[2] Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. SPORT Investi gators: surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358: 794-810.
[3] Malmivaara A, Sl?tis P, Heli?vaara M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(1): 1-8.
[4] Ikuta K, Tono O, Tanaka T, et al. Surgical complications of microendoscopic procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2007, 50: 145-149.
[5] Yagi M, Okada E, Ninomiya K, et al. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 10: 293-299.
[6] Eun SS, Eum JH, Lee SH, et al. Biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression for lumbar disk herniation and spinal canal stenosis: a technical note [J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2017, 78: 390-396.
[7] Pranata R, Lim MA, Vania R, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery versus microscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 138: e450-e458.
[8] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta- analyses: the PRISMA statement [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009, 151(4): 264- 269.
[9] Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [J]. Cochrane Collaboration, 2011, 17(4): 535.
[10] Park SM, Park J, Jang HS, et al. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Spine J, 2020, 20: 156-165.
[11] Kang T, Park SY, Kang CH, et al. Is biportal technique/ endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a prospective randomized comparative study [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98: e15451.
[12] 庹伟，周霖，刘德森，等. 单侧双通道内镜技术治疗腰 椎管狭窄的初步研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志，2021，21 （1）：56-60.
[13] Choi DJ, Kim JE. Efficacy of biportal endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2019, 11: 82-88.
[14] Min WK, Kim JE, Choi DJ, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decom-pression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2020, 25(3): 371-378.
[15] Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2019, 46: E9.
[16] Heo DH, Quillo- Olvera J, Park CK. Can percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery achieve enough canal decompression for degenerative lumbar stenosis: prospective casecontrol study [J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120: e684-e689.
[17] Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, et al. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21: 143-149.
[18] Lin GX, Huang P, Kotheeranurak V, et al. A systematic review of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery: preliminary clinical results and complications [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 25: 425-432.
[19] Kim JE, Choi DJ. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression by 30° endoscopy in lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note and preliminary report [J]. J Orthop, 2018, 15(2): 366- 371.
[20] Park SM, Kim GU, Kim HJ, et al. Is the use of a unilateral biportal endoscopic approach associated with rapid recovery after lumbar decompressive laminectomy: a preliminary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 128: e709-e718.
[21] Kim W, Kim SK, Kang SS, et al. Pooled analysis of unsuccessful percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery outcomes from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 797 cases [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2020, 162(2): 279-287.

相似文献/References:

[1]王永康.全可视内镜引导下单侧入路双侧减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(12):685.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.004]
　WANG Yong-kang.Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J].,2023,28(02):685.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01