[1]申汉威 李俊卿 李红星 汪立刚 杨孔宾.颅内破裂动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术后脑积水发生率的比较分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):140-143.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.004]
 SHEN Han-wei,LI Jun-qing,LI Hong-xing,et al.Clinical study and Meta-analysis of incidences of hydrocephalus after microsurgery and endovascular embolization in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].,2015,(03):140-143.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.004]
点击复制

颅内破裂动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术后脑积水发生率的比较分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
140-143
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2015-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study and Meta-analysis of incidences of hydrocephalus after microsurgery and endovascular embolization in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms
文章编号:
1009-153X(2015)03-0140-04
作者:
申汉威 李俊卿 李红星 汪立刚 杨孔宾
150001 哈尔滨,哈尔滨医科大学附属第一临床学院神经外科
通讯作者:杨孔宾,E-mail:ykbneurosurgery@sina.com
Author(s):
SHEN Han-wei LI Jun-qing LI Hong-xing WANG Li-gang YANG Kong-bin.
Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
关键词:
颅内破裂动脉瘤脑积水开颅夹闭术血管内栓塞术荟萃分析
Keywords:
Intracranial ruptured aneurysm Hydrocephalus Craniotomy clipping Endovascular embolization Meta analysis
分类号:
R 743.9; R 619
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价不同治疗方法对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者分流依赖性脑积水发生率的影响。方法 回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年12月我院收治的557例aSAH患者的临床资料,其中夹闭术治疗291例,血管内栓塞术治疗266例;另外,通过计算机检索国内外数据库,并对符合标准的文献应用Review Manager 5.2软件进行Meta分析,系统评价夹闭术和血管内栓塞术对aSAH患者术后分流依赖性脑积水发生率的影响。结果 本组开颅夹闭术组分流依赖性脑积水发生率(46.7%,91/291)与血管内栓塞术组(53.3%,104/266)无显著差异(P>0.05);脑室内出血和急性脑积水对两种治疗方式术后分流依赖性脑积水发生率无显著影响(P>0.05)。Meta分析共纳入符合要求文献9篇包含5 093例患者,其中开颅夹闭术组3 340例,血管内栓塞术组1 612例。两组治疗方法术后分流依赖性脑积水发生率无显著差异[优势比(OR)=0.84;95%可信区间(CI)为0.64~1.12;P=0.24]。对于存在脑室内出血的aSAH患者,血管内栓塞术后发生分流依赖性脑积水的几率明显降低(OR=0.56;95% CI为0.35~0.90;P=0.02)。结论 对于存在脑室内出血的aSAH患者,建议行血管内栓塞术治疗,有助于降低术后分流依赖性脑积水的几率。
Abstract:
Objective To assess the effects of microsurgery and endovascular embolization on the incidence of hydrocephalus in the patients ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Method The clinical data of 557 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, of whom, 291 underwent craniotomy and 266 endovascular embolization from January, 2012 to December, 2013, were analyzed retrospectively. The databases at home and abroad were searched by the computer for the literatures related to the hydrocephalus after the microsurgery or endovascular embolization in the patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. All the acquired data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 software. Results Of 291 patients undergoing the craniotomy, 91 (31.29%) suffered from the shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and 200 not. Of 266 patients undergoing endovascular embolization, 104 (39.10%) suffered from shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and 162 not. There was insignificant difference in the hydrocephalus incidence between both the groups. Meta analysis showed that there was insignificant difference in the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus between the patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms undergoing craniotomy and ones undergoing endovascular embolization, and the intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was very risk factor of the hydrocephalus in the patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms undergoing endovascular embolization. Conclusion Generally speaking, the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is not influenced by treatment Methods including microsurgery and endovascular embolization in the patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms except the patients with IVH after the aneurysms ruptured.

参考文献/References:

[1] Varelas P, Helms A, Sinson G, et al. Clipping or coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms and shunt-dependent hydro- cephalus [J]. Neurocrit Care, 2006, 4: 223-228.
[2] Dorai Z, Hynan LS, Kopitnik TA, et al. Factors related to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52: 763-771.
[3] GruberA, Reinprecht A, Bavinzski G, et al. Chronic shunt- dependent hydrocephalus after early surgical and early endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 1999, 44: 503-509.
[4] Dehdashti AR, Rilliet B, Rufenacht DA, et al. Shunt-de- pendent hydrocephalus after rupture of intracranial aneury- sms: a prospective study of the influence of treatment moda- lity [J]. J Neurosurg, 2004, 101: 402-407.
[5] De Oliveira JG, Beck J, Setzer M, et al. Risk of shunt-de- pendent hydrocephalus after occlusion of ruptured intracra- nial aneurysms by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling: a single-institution series and meta-analysis [J]. Neurosur- gery, 2007, 61: 924-933.
[6] Roy KokMiang, ZhixuN, Sharon Y, et al. Management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the post-ISAT era: out- come of surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in a Singapore tertiary institution [J]. Singapore Med J, 2013, 54 (6): 332-338.
[7] Nam KH, Hamm IS, Kang DH, et al. Risk of shunt depen- dent hydrocephalus after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling according to fisher grading system [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2010, 48:313-318.
[8] Premananda RM, Ramesh N, Hillol KP. Functional outcome of microsurgical clipping compared to endovascular coiling [J]. Med J Malaysia, 2012, 6(67): 585-590.
[9] London Clinical Effectiveness Unit. National study of sub- arachnoid haemorrhage: final report of an audit carried out in 34 neurosurgical units in the UK between 14 september 2001 to 13 september 2002 [M]. London: The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2006. 1-56.
[10] Vale FL, Bradley EL, Fisher WS, et al. The relationship of subarachnoid hemorrhage and the need for postoperative shunting [J]. J Neurosurg, 1997, 86: 462-466.

相似文献/References:

[1]周 平 邓 燕 王 辉 罗 杰 胡钧涛 刘开军 李安荣 李新建.脊髓脊膜膨出合并脑积水分流手术时机的选择[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(11):692.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.11.017]
[2]张晓燕 张 穗 宋利亚.颅内破裂动脉瘤急诊夹闭术围手术期护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):308.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.019]
[3]李光亮 赵向南 王方艺.创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血继发脑积水的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):433.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.015]
[4]伍 杰 杨 铭 潘 力 蔡明俊 刘 鹏 秦 杰 杨 柳 安学锋 李国栋 马廉亭.颅内破裂动脉瘤合并脑内血肿的复合手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):193.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.001]
 WU Jie,YANG Ming,PAN Li,et al.Clinical observation of hybrid surgery on ruptured intracranial aneurysms associated with cerebral hematomas (report of 5 cases)[J].,2016,(03):193.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.001]
[5]符传艺 陈健龙 张 茂 刘朝晖 黄垂学 黄 军 马建荣 赵建农.表现为脑室出血的颅内破裂动脉瘤的诊治[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):234.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.014]
[6]娄元华 李小勇 陈红伟 潘栋超 解东成 刘东升.婴儿脑积水分流术后硬膜下积液的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):245.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.019]
[7]郑鉴峰 郭宗铎 张晓冬 朱 继 何朝晖 孙晓川.开颅夹闭术和血管内栓塞术治疗老年前交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):150.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.006]
 ZHENG Jian-feng,GUO Zong-duo,ZHANG Xiao-dong,et al.Craniotomy clipping and interventional treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms in elderly patients: comparison of curative effects[J].,2016,(03):150.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.006]
[8]张家康 彭 飞 陈 鑫 侯 旭 张大明 刘震东 赵世光.后颅窝减压术治疗Chiari畸形Ⅰ型合并脑积水疗效的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):158.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.009]
 ZHANG Jia-kang,PENG Fei,CHEN Xin,et al.Posterion fossa decompression for Chiari I malformation with hydrocephalus: a meta-analysis[J].,2016,(03):158.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.009]
[9]李玉龙 方兴根 李真保 吴德刚 赖年升 赵心同 徐善水 狄广福.血管内治疗颈内动脉床突旁破裂动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):79.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.006]
 LI Yu-long,FANG Xing-gen,LI Zhen-bao,et al.Endovascular embolization of ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms (report of 26 cases)[J].,2016,(03):79.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.006]
[10]胡 骁 周林裕 王 克 邓剑平 赵振伟.支架辅助血管内栓塞前交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):82.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.007]
 HU Xiao,ZHOU Lin-yu,WANG Ke,et al.Curative effect of stent-assisted endovascular embolization on ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2016,(03):82.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-30