[1]张 勖 王增亮 刘 冬 李亚宾 汪永新.脑脓肿不同时期手术干预的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(09):523-526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.004]
 ZHANG Xu,WANG Zeng-liang,Liu Dong,et al.Analysis of curative effects of surgical interventions in different formation periods on brain abscess[J].,2016,(09):523-526.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.004]
点击复制

脑脓肿不同时期手术干预的疗效分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年09期
页码:
523-526
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2016-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of curative effects of surgical interventions in different formation periods on brain abscess
文章编号:
1009-153X(2016)09-0523-04
作者:
张 勖 王增亮 刘 冬 李亚宾 汪永新
830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院神经外科
Author(s):
ZHANG Xu WANG Zeng-liang Liu Dong Li Ya-bin WANG Yong-xin
Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi 830054, China
关键词:
脑脓肿脓肿引流术脓肿切除术预后
Keywords:
Brain abscess Different formation period Drainage Excision Prognosis
分类号:
R 742.7; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨脑脓肿不同时期手术方法及其疗效。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月~2015年12月收治的52例脑脓肿的临床资料,依据病理分期及手术方式分为4组:化脓期引流术组14例,化脓期切除术组13例,脓肿形成期引流术组10例,脓肿形成期切除术组15例。术后随访60 d,分析各组疗效、病死率、复发率及术后住院天数、神经症状缓解时间。结果 4组性别比、年龄分布、入院GCS评分无明显差异(P>0.05)。脓肿形成期切除术组中位住院天数较脓肿形成期引流术组明显延长(P<0.05),而与化脓期引流术组、化脓期切除术组均无明显差异(>P>0.05)。化脓期引流术组病死率明显高于其他3组(P<0.05)。4组术后复发率均无明显差异(>P>0.05)。脓肿形成期切除术组中位神经症状缓解时间最短(P<0.05)。>结论 脓肿形成期引流术后住院天数较长,但神经症状缓解较快;化脓期出现脑疝征象时,应积极手术干预,必要时行去骨瓣减压术。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effects of different surgical intervention in different period on brain abscess. Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with brain abscess treated in our hospital from January, 2010 to December, 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the pathological stage and operation method, 54 patients were divided into four groups. Of 27 patients in maturating period, 14 underwent drainage of the abscess (group A) and 13 excision of the abscess (group B). Of 25 patients in the maturated period, 7 underwent drainage of the abscess (group C) and 18 excision (group D). The curative effect and postoperative hospital stays were compared among all the groups. Results There were insignificant differences in the male vs female ratio, ages and GCS score on admission to hospital among all the groups (P>0.05). The median hospital stays after the operation were significantly shorter in group D than group C (PP

参考文献/References:

[1]郑 峥,宿英英. 脑脓肿治疗研究进展[J]. 中国神经免疫 学和神经病学杂志,2006,13(1):60-63.
[2] 于 新,刘 锐,张剑宁,等. 多房性脑脓肿的临床特点与 治疗选择[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2012,12:1263-1266.
[3] 岑 波,陈红兵,胡 飞,等. 术中超声引导下显微外科手 术治疗脑脓肿[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2012,17(9): 557-558.
[4] Sarmast AH, Showkat HI, Kirmani AR, et al. Aspiration ver- sus excision: single centerexperienceof forty-seven patients with brain abscess over 10 years [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2012, 52(10): 724-730.
[5] Arlotti M, Grossi P, Pea F, et al. Consensus document on controversial issues for the treatment of infections of the central nervous system: bacterial brain abscesses [J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2010, 14 Suppl 4: S79-92.
[6] Muzumdar D, Jhawar S, Goel A. Brain abscess: an overview [J]. Int J Surg, 2011, 9(2): 136-44.
[7] Landriel F, Ajler P, Hem S, et al. Supratentorial and infra- tentorial brain abscesses: surgical treatment, complications andoutcomes—a 10-year single-center study [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2012, 154(5): 903-911.
[8] 袁邦清,傅芬兰,黄绍宽,等. 立体定向穿刺引流术治疗脑 脓肿失败原因探析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂 志,2013,26(4):220-222.
[9] Nathoo N, Nadvi SS, Narotam PK, et al. Brain abscess: management and outcome analysis of a computed tomogra- phyera experience with 973 patients [J]. World Neurosurg, 2011,75(5-6): 716-726.
[10] Ratnaike TE, Das S, Gregson BA, et al. A review of brain abscess surgical treatment—78 years: aspiration versus excision [J]. World Neurosurg, 2011, 76(5): 431-436.
[11] Lu CH, Chang WN, Lui CC. Strategies for the management of bacterial brain abscess [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2006, 13(10): 979-985.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈心怡 杨正明 李朝曦 曾 亮 王和平 雷 霆.脑脓肿术后并发抑郁症1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(06):406.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.06.013]
[2]阿布来提·胡达白地 综述 黄书岚 审校.脑脓肿的诊断和治疗进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(01):53.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.023]
[3]刘 金 肖 胜 武永康.MRS联合立体定向穿刺术治疗脑脓肿11例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(02):105.
[4]阿布来提·胡达白地 黄书岚.开颅手术和MRI导航下穿刺术治疗脑脓肿的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(07):499.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.018]
[5]孙永谋,苏贺先.脑脓肿18例治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(10):686.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.10.015]
[6]金 科 褚荣涛 孙成法 张志越 支文勇 程序曲 姜 华.9例脑脓肿的手术治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(12):760.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.12.014]
[7]张修民 聂 盼 柳 雯 张继波 付 锴 陈劲草 江普查 张 捷.立体定向穿刺引流术或开颅切除术治疗脑脓肿[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(09):632.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.020]
[8]李宗锴 潘 亮 刘四新 董珊珊.不典型隐源性脑脓肿1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(09):651.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.028]
[9]肖胜,喻军华,刘金,等.基底节出血并发血肿腔内急性脑脓肿1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(06):522.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.06.031]
[10]茅蒋鑫,陈劲草,赵时雨,等.尖端赛多孢子菌致多发脑脓肿1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(05):421.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.05.030]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区青年科技人才专项科研项目(2015Y35)
通讯作者:汪永新,E-mail:xjdwyx2000@sohu.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-09-30