[1]姚　顺,吴　敏,宋　健,等.漫性轴索损伤远期预后影响因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):661-663693.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.003]
　YAO Shun,WU Min,SONG Jian,et al.Analysis of factor related to prognosis in patients with diffuse axonal injury[J].,2016,(11):661-663693.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.003]
点击复制

漫性轴索损伤远期预后影响因素分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年11期
页码:
661-663693
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2016-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of factor related to prognosis in patients with diffuse axonal injury
文章编号:
1009-153X（2016）11-0661-03
作者:
姚　顺; 吴　敏; 宋　健; 曹成龙; 房　莉; 何志远; 孙荣辉; 杜　浩; 徐国政
430070 武汉，中国人民解放军武汉总医院神经外科[姚　顺、宋健、曹成龙（南方医科大学在读研究生）、房　莉、何志远、孙荣辉、杜　浩、徐国政；310003 杭州，浙江大学医学院附属第一医院神经内科[吴　敏（浙江大学医学院在读研究生）]
Author(s):
YAO Shun1;  WU Min2;  SONG Jian1;  CAO Chen-long1;  FANG Li1;  HE Yuang-zhi1;  SUN Rong-hui1;  Du Hao1;  Xu Guo-zheng1.
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Wuhan General Hospital, PLA, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
关键词:
弥漫性轴索损伤; 远期预后; 影响因素; Logistic回归分析
Keywords:
Diffuse axonal injury;  Prognosis;  Factors;  Statistical analysis
分类号:
R 651.1+5
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨弥漫性轴索损伤（DAI）远期预后的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2015年5月收治的236例DAI的临床资料，伤后6个月，采用GOS评估远期预后。采用多因素Logistic回归分析检验影响因素。结果 236例中，死亡29例（12.3%），植物生存或仅有最小意识反应18例（7.6%），重残42例（17.8%），中残38例（16.1%），恢复良好109例（46.2%）。预后良好（GOS评分4~5分）147例（62.3%），预后不良（GOS评分1~3分）89例（37.7%）。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示，年龄、运动评分、瞳孔反应和Levi-CT分级是评估DAI患者远期预后的独立良好指标。结论 年龄>60岁、运动评分1~2分、瞳孔异常和Levi-CT分级Ⅱ~Ⅲ级是DAI患者远期预后不良的独立危险因素。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the independent predictors of long-term outcome in the patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI). Methods The clinical data of 236 patients with DAI, who were treated in our hospital from January, 2010 to May, 2015, were analyzed retrospectively. The factors related to the prognosis in the patients with DAI were analyzed respectively by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Of 236 patients with DAI, 147 had good prognoses (GOS. 4~5 scores) and 89 poor (GOS 1~3 scores) 6 months after the treatment. The univariate analysis showed that the factors related to the prognosis included age, GCS, motor score, pupillary reactivity, Levi CT Scoring, Babinski’s sign, body temperature and blood glucose level in the patients with DAI. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent factors influencing the prognosis included age, motor score, pupillary reactivity and Levi CT scoring in the patients with DAI. Conclusions Age >60 years, motor score <3 points, abnormal pupillary reactivity and Levi CT scoring ≥ grade 2 are independent risk factors related to the poor prognosis in the patients with DAI.

参考文献/References:

[1] 姚　顺，徐国政. 弥漫性轴索损伤的神经网络研究进展 [J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2015，20（1）：52-54.
[2] 贺晓生，章　翔，易声禹. 弥漫性轴索损伤[J]. 中华神经外 科杂志，1999，15（1）：61-63.
[3] Levi L, Guilburd JN, Lemberger A, et al. Diffuse axonal injury: analysis of 100 patients with radiological signs [J]. Neurosurgery, 1990, 27(3): 429-432.
[4] Skandsen T, Kvistad KA, Solheim O, et al. Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome [J]. J Neurosurg, 2010, 113(3): 556-563.
[5] Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, et al. Predicting out- come in individual patients after severe head injury [J]. Lancet, 1976, 1(7968): 1031-1034.
[6] Mushkudiani NA, Hukkelhoven CW, Hernandez AV, et al. A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(4): 331-343.
[7] Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury development and inter- national validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics [J]. PLoS Med, 2008, 5(8): 1251-1261.
[8] Panczykowski DM, Puccio AM, Scruggs BJ, et al. Prospec- tive independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prog- nostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury [J]. J Neuro- trauma, 2012, 29(1): 47-52.
[9] Schouten JW. Neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury: a complex struggle against the biology of nature [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2007, 13(2): 134-142.
[10] Majdan M, Steyerbery EW, Nieboer D, et al. GCS motor score and pupillary reaction to predict six month mortality in patients with TBI: comparison of field and admission assessment [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2014, 32(2): 101-108.
[11] Hoffmann M, Lefering R, Rueger JM, et al. Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow Coma Scale components in predic- tion of traumatic brain injury and mortality [J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(1): 122-130.
[12] Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: develop- ment and validation of a prognostic score based on admis- sion characteristics [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2005, 22(10): 1025- 1039.
[13] Marshman LA. Brain stem blood flow, pupillary response, and outcome in patients with severe head injuries [J]. Neu- rosurgery, 2002, 51(3): 848-849.
[14] Mallouhi A. Craniocerebral trauma: magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse axonal injury [J]. Radiologe, 2014, 54(9): 907-915.
[15] Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S, Nakagawa A, et al. Intraven- tricular hemorrhage on initial computed tomography as mar- ker of diffuse axonal injury after traumatic brain injury [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2015, 32(5): 359-365.
[16] 孙奎胜，孙　涛，高　攀，等. 弥漫性轴索损伤早期CT表 现与预后[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2013，29（9）：927-930.
[17] Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis [J]. Trends Neurosci, 2010, 33(1): 1-9.
[18] 姚　顺，宋　健，黄　河，等. 弥漫性轴索损伤意识障碍患 者的脑默认网络研究[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2013，31 （11）：1135-1140.
[19] Yao S, Song J, Gao LC, et al. Thalamocortical sensorimotor circuit damage associated with disorder of consciousness for diffuse axonal injury patients [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2015, 356 (1-2): 168-174.
[20] Maxwell WL, Mackinnon MA, Smith DH, et al. Thalamic nuclei after human blunt head injury [J]. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2006, 65(5): 478-488.
[21] Van Beek JG, Mushkudiani NA, Steyerberg WE, et al. Prog- nostic value of admission laboratory parameters in trauma- tic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study [J]. J Neu- rotrauma, 2007, 24(2): 315-328.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭宏伟　高玉松　罗新民　张松坡　胡承啸　扈俊华　柴　超　雷亚萍.儿童弥漫轴索损伤早期诊断与治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):368.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.016]
[2]张一帆 综述　张国来 审校.弥漫性轴索损伤影像学诊断的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):442.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.020]
[3]戚　睿 综述　冯东福 审校.弥漫性轴索损伤后认知功能障碍的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(12):764.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.022]
[4]张玉定　王　雄　程品文.早期高压氧治疗弥漫性轴索损伤的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):366.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.06.017]
[5]姚　顺 综述　徐国政 审校.弥漫性轴索损伤的神经网络研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):52.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.01.018]
[6]刘　瑞　梁广榆　肖安兵.改良大骨瓣减压术对颅脑损伤患者神经功能及远期预后的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):489.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.016]
[7]施申启　汪　玲　李承明　李　江　詹　砚　刘　帅　金　学　刘　丽.Helsinki CT评分系统对颅脑损伤远期预后的预测作用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(12):824.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.12.008]
　SHI Shen-qi,WANG Lin,LI Cheng-ming,et al.Prediction of long-term prognoses with Helsinki CT scoring system in patients with traumatic brain injury[J].,2017,(11):824.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.12.008]
[8]郑锐哲　孙兆良 综述　冯东福 审校.弥漫性轴索损伤后认知功能障碍与神经网络的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(02):132.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：全军医学科技“十二五”重点项目（BWS11J066）
通讯作者：徐国政，Email：xu-gz@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-25