[1]郭雄飞　徐　峰　李　涛　熊承杰.责任节段颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(08):519-522.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.08.003]
　GUO Xiong-fei,XU Feng,LI Tao,et al.Responsible segment unilateral posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].,2018,(08):519-522.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.08.003]
点击复制

责任节段颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年08期
页码:
519-522
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Responsible segment unilateral posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy
文章编号:
1009-153X（2018）08-0519-04
作者:
郭雄飞　徐　峰　李　涛　熊承杰
作者单位：473009 河南，南阳市中心医院骨科（郭雄飞）；430000 武汉，中国人民解放军武汉总医院骨科（徐　峰、李　涛、熊承杰）
Author(s):
GUO Xiong-fei1;  XU Feng2;  LI Tao2;  XIONG Cheng-jie2.
1. Orthopedic Department, Nanyang Municipal Center Hospital, Nanyang 473009, China; 2. Orthopedic Department, Wuhan General Hospital, PLA, Wuhan 430070, China
关键词:
多节段脊髓型颈椎病; 椎管扩大成形术; 颈后路; 单开门; 广泛式; 责任节段; 疗效
Keywords:
Multi-level cervical spondylotic myelpathy;  Laminoplasty;  Posterior cervical approach;  Single-opening door
分类号:
R 681.5; R 687.3
DOI:
doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.08.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比广泛式与责任节段颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术（EOLP）治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病（MCSM）的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析自2013年3月至2015年5月接受EOLP治疗的41例MCSM的临床资料。采用广泛式EOLP治疗24例（广泛式组），采用责任节段EOLP治疗17例（责任节段组）。结果 广泛式组术后随访（17.63±4.12）个月，责任节段组术后随访（18.15±3.92）个月。责任节段组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后住院时间均明显减少（P<0.05）。术后12个月，广泛式组日本骨科协会（JOA）评分[（14.78±1.25）分]与责任节段组[（14.57±1.31）分]无统计学差异（P>0.05）；末次随访，广泛式组JOA评分[（15.01±1.34）分]与责任节段组组[（14.76±1.28）分]无统计学差异（P>0.05）。末次随访，责任节段组明显轴性症状比例（17.65%，3/17）明显低于广泛式组（50.00%，12/24；P<0.05）。结论 广泛式与责任节段EOLP治疗MCSM疗效均肯定，但后者具有损伤小、恢复快、可明显降低术后颈椎轴性症状等优势。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of extensive posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) on multiple segments cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with those of responsible segment unilateral posterior cervical EOLP. Methods Of 41 patients with MCSM undergoing microsurgery from March, 2013 to May, 2015, 24 (group A) were treated by extensive EOLP and 17 (group B) by responsible segment EOLP. The operative duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative drainage fluid volume, postoperative hospital stay and axial symptoms (AS) were compared between both the groups. Neurological function was determined before and after the surgery by Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) in both the groups. All the patients were followed up from 16 to 40 months. Results The operation duration, volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of postoperative drainage fluid and postoperative hospital stay were significantly fewer in group B than those in group A (P<0.05). The percentage of patients with obvious cervical spine AS was significantly lower in the B group than that in the A group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the JOA scores between the two groups before and after the operation (P>0.05). Conclusion The effects of extensive and responsible segment posterior cervical EOLP on MCSM are all good. However, the latter has the advantages including little operative side injury, rapid recovery, and less postoperative cervical spine AS and is worthy of clinical spread.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈世骏. 改良单开门颈椎管扩大成形术对脊髓型颈椎病 术后轴性症状的影响[D]. 福建医科大学，2016.
[2] 王　伟，于海洋，梁成民，等. 后路椎板切除侧块螺钉固 定治疗多节段颈椎病术后脊髓后移和膨胀变化及其与 疗效的相关性[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2015，25（4）： 317-322.
[3] 薛经来，韩德韬. 脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗进展[J]. 中国医 学创新，2010，7（5）：187-188.
[4] 崔明宇. 脊髓型颈椎病不同手术入路的疗效比较研究[J]. 中国医药导报，2012，9（1）：32-34.
[5] Chen H, Liu H, Zou, L, et al. Effect of mini-plate fixation on hinge fracture and bony fusion in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty [J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2016, 29(6): E288-295.
[6] 陈　华，刘　浩，林　书，等. Centerpiece钢板应用于颈椎 后路单开门椎板成形术的临床效果观察[J]. 生物骨科材 料与临床研究，2012，9（6）：12-15.
[7] Lin S, Zou F, Sun Y, et al. The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cer- vical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(1): 127-135.
[8] 张黎龙，程招军，崔子健，等. MRI测量脊髓型颈椎病患者 矢状位参数相关性分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志， 2017，31（4）：451-454.
[9] Wu FL, Sun Y, Pan SF, et al. Risk factors associated with upper extremity palsy after expansive open-door lamino- plasty for cervical myelopathy [J]. Spine J, 2014, 14(6): 909-915.
[10] 段　文，张建湘. 改善轴性症状发生的手术方式进展[J]. 安徽医科大学学报，2011，46（12）：1299-1302.
[11] 李　雷，王　欢，崔少千，等. 重建后方韧带复合体的颈椎 单开门桥式植骨椎板成形术对术后轴性症状和颈椎曲 度的影响[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志，2007，21﹙5﹚：457- 460.
[12] 林圣荣，周非非，孙　宇，等. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大椎板 成形术后颈椎矢状面平衡的变化[J]. 中华医学杂志， 2014，94（35）：2726-2730.
[13] 王子予. 颈椎后路双开门椎管成形术中颈椎曲度与术后 C5神经麻痹发生的相关性研究[D]. 吉林大学，2017.
[14] 刘国臻，刘　磊，王运涛. 颈椎后路减压术后C5神经根麻 痹危险因素及预防措施的研究现状[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂 志，2017，27（12）：1135-1138.
[15] 刘晓伟，陈德玉，王　波，等. C3~7与C3~C6节段单开门 椎管扩大成形术后轴性痛的差异[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂 志，2012，22（11）：989-993.
[16] Yeh KT, Chen IH, Yu TC, et al. Modified expansive open- door laminoplasty technique improved postoperative neck pain and cervical range of motion [J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2015, 114(12): 1225-1232.

相似文献/References:

[1]周迎春　王　旋　雷德强　王海均　赵洪洋.多节段脊髓型颈椎病后路显微减压及融合术的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(11):648.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.11.003]
　ZHOU Ying-chun,WANG Xuan,LEI De-qiang,et al.Clinical observation of effects of posterior microdecompression and fusion on multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].,2019,(08):648.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.11.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金（81401802）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-07