[1]曹佳雨 丁圣豪 赵 兵 樊翊凌 潘耀华 万杰清.颈内动脉眼动脉段动脉瘤手术治疗分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):19-21.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.005]
 CAO Jia-yu,DING Sheng-hao,ZHAO Bing,et al.Clinical analysis of effects of different surgical forms on internal carotid artery ophthalmic segment aneurysms[J].,2019,(01):19-21.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.005]
点击复制

颈内动脉眼动脉段动脉瘤手术治疗分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
19-21
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical analysis of effects of different surgical forms on internal carotid artery ophthalmic segment aneurysms
文章编号:
1009-153X(2019)01-0019-03
作者:
曹佳雨 丁圣豪 赵 兵 樊翊凌 潘耀华 万杰清
Author(s):
CAO Jia-yu DING Sheng-hao ZHAO Bing FAN Yi-ling PAN Yao-hua WAN Jie-qing.
Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China
关键词:
颅内动脉瘤颈内动脉眼动脉段视力障碍血管内治疗夹闭术支架弹簧圈
Keywords:
Intracranial aneurysm Internal carotid artery Ophthalmic segment Endovascular treatment Microsurgery
分类号:
R743.9;R651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨颈内动脉眼动脉段动脉瘤(OSAs)的手术治疗方法及其疗效。方法 回顾性分析2005年8月至2015年12月年收治的88例OSAs的临床资料。88例共109枚动脉瘤。无眼部症状的48例69枚小型动脉瘤中,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞49枚,单纯弹簧圈栓塞20枚;无眼部症状的17例单发大型或巨大动脉瘤中,球囊辅助栓塞2例,支架辅助栓塞13例,球囊联合支架辅助栓塞2例;合并视力障碍的23例(均为单发动脉瘤,小型动脉瘤12枚,大型或巨大型动脉瘤11枚),12例栓塞,11例行动脉瘤夹闭术。结果 栓塞治疗的98枚动脉瘤术后即刻造影示,致密栓塞87枚,瘤颈部分显影11枚。88例术后平均随访18个月,术后6个月DSA或CTA随访,致密栓塞的47枚小型动脉瘤中,复发2枚(4.2%);17例大型或巨大型动脉瘤中,复发5例(29.4%)。合并视力障碍的23例中,术后眼部症状改善13例(栓塞6例,夹闭7例),未见明显变化6例(栓塞3例,夹闭3例),加重4例(栓塞3例,夹闭1例)。结论 血管内栓塞治疗OSAs微创、安全、有效,但对改善视力障碍而言,夹闭术可能优于栓塞术。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of different operative forms on ophthalmic segment aneurysms (OSAs). Methods The clinical data of 88 patients with 109 OSAs including with 57 unruptured OSAs and 31 with ruptured OSAs, who were treated in Renji Hospital from August, 2005 to December, 2015, were analyzed respectively. Of 88 patients with 109 OSAs, 77 with 98 OSAs were treated by endovascular embolization, and 11 with 11 OSAs by microsurgical clipping. All the patients were followed up with MRA or CTA or DSA and received the assessment of prognosis with modified Rankin scale (mRS) 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation. The improvements of ophthalmic symptoms were followed up 3, 6 and 12 after the operations in the patients with visual deficit caused by OSAs. Results Of 69 small OSAs in 65 patients without ophthalmic symptoms, 49 received stent-assisted coiling embolization and 20 only by coiling embolization. OSAs recurred in 2 (3.1%) aneurysms during the following-up. Of 17 large or giant OSAs in 17 of these 65 patients without ophthalmic symptoms, 2 were treated by balloon-assisted coiling embolization, 13 by stent-assisted coiling embolization, and 2 by balloon combined with stent-assisted coiling embolization. OSAs recurred in 5 (29.4%, 5/17) during the following-up. Of 23 patients with visual deficit caused by OSAs including 12 patients with small OSAs and 11 patients with large or giant OSAs, 12 were treated by interventional embolization, and 11 by microsurgical clipping of OSAs. The following-up after the operation showed that the ophthalmic symptoms were improved in 6, unchanged in 3 and worsen in 3 of 12 patients with visual deficit undergoing the interventional embolization. The ophthalmic symptoms were improved in 7, unchanged in 3 and worsen in 1 of 11 patients with visual deficit undergoing the microsurgical clipping during the following up. Conclusions The endovascular embolization is a minimally-invasive, safe, and effective method to treat OSAs, but the microsurgical clipping is superior in the improvement of visual deficit to interventional embolization in the patients with OSAs.

参考文献/References:

[1] De Jesus, Selchar CN, Riedel CJ. Clinoid and paraclinoid
aneurysms: surgical anatomy, operative techniques and
outcome [J]. Surg Neural, 1999, 51: 477-487
[2] Lai CT, Morgan MK. Outcomes for unruptured ophthalmic
segment aneurysm surgery [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2013, 20:
1127-1133.
[3] Sullivan BJ, Sekhar LN, Duong DH, et al. Profound hypo-
thermia and circulatory arrest with skull base approaches for
treatment of complex posterior circulation aneurysms [J].
Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1999, 141: 1-11.
[4] Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. Stratification of outcome for surgically
treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery,
2003, 52: 82-87.
[5] Rinkel GJE, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of
ruptured of intracranial aneurysms-a systematic review [J].
Neurosurgery, 2006, 59: S113-124.
[6] Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angio-
graphic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment
of aneurysms with detachable coils [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34:
1398-1403.
[7] Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PC, et al. Optimi-
zing cutoff scores for the Barthel index and the modified
Rankin scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials [J].
Stroke, 2005, 36: 1984-1987.
[8] Johnstan SC, Zhan S, Dudley RA, et al. Treatment of unrup-
tured cerebral aneurysms in California [J]. Stroke 2001, 32:
597-605.
[9] Ferrell AS, Lessne ML, et al. Visual complications after
stent-assisted endovascular embolization of paraophthalmic
and suprasellar variant superior hypophyseal aneurysms:
the Duke Cerebrovascular Center experience in 57 patients
[J]. World Neurosurg, 2012, 78: 289-294.
[10] No authors listed. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-risk
of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International
Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators
[J]. N Engl J Med, 1998,339: 1725-1733.
[11] Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, et al. Clinical and angio-
graphic results of endovascular coiling treatment of giant
and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-
center experience [J]. Neurosurgery, 1999, 45: 793-800.
[12] Jha AN, Butler P, Lye RH, et al. Carotid ligation: what hap-
pens in the long term [J]? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,
1986, 49: 893-898.
[13] Gao X, Liang G, Li Y, et al. Neuroform stent-assisted coiling
of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: angiographic and
clinical outcomes in 71 consecutive patients [J]. Neurol
India, 2010, 58: 825-832.[14] Yavuz K, Geyik S, Cekirge S, et al. Doouble stent-assisted
coil embolization treatment for bifurcation aneurysms:
immediate treatment results and long-term angiographic
outcome [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013, 34: 1778-
1784.
[15] 武成刚,王 宏. 外科手术与血管栓塞治疗办动眼神经麻
痹性后交通动脉瘤疗效对比观察[J]. 山东医药,2011,
51:33-34.
[16] Schuss P, Guresir E, Berkefeld J, et al. Influence of surgical
or endovascular treatment on visual symptoms caused by
intracranial aneurysms: single-center series and systematic
review [J]. J Neurosurg, 2011, 15: 694-699.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾 春 张施远 蒋永明.复合手术与常规夹闭术治疗颈内动脉后交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比研究[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
 ZENG Chun,ZHANG Shi-yuan,JIANG Yong-ming.Analysis of the effects of hybrid surgery on posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a comparison with conventional craniotomy[J].,2016,(01):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
[2]周有东 敖祥生 刘汉东 王志勇 朱耀祖 周达全.支架辅助弹簧圈和单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
 ZHOU You-dong,AO Xiang-sheng,LIU Han-dong,et al.A mata-analysis of curative effects of stent-assisted coiling and simple coiling on intracranial aneurysms and their safety[J].,2016,(01):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
[3]赵 平 王雄伟 汪 雷 马金阳.显微手术和血管内栓塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
 ZHAO Ping,WANG Xiong-wei,WANG Lei,et al.Effect of endovascular treatment on intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with microsurgery[J].,2016,(01):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
[4]李朝晖 王玉贵 张孟超 综述 赵兴利 审校.CT灌注成像在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的 临床应用进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):313.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.021]
[5]刘福德 邓剑平 张 涛 陈 虎 李 帅 王俭博 曲友直 赵振伟.椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管内治疗(附48例分析)[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
 LIU Fu-de,DENG Jian-ping,ZHANG Tao,et al.Endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms (report of 48 cases)[J].,2016,(01):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
[6]吴有志 罗良生 张 健 陈 骅 吴 鸣 刘 振 史 岩.前循环破裂动脉瘤伴脑内血肿的 早期显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):376.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.020]
[7]潘 力 刘 鹏 秦 杰 杨 柳 安学峰 吴 虓 杨 铭 徐国政 马廉亭.Y型支架辅助技术在颅内动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤治疗中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
 PAN Li,LIU Peng,QIN Jie,et al.Application of Y -configuration stent technique to treatment of intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms[J].,2016,(01):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
[8]周 量 刘 丛 张昌伟.早期栓塞术治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
 ZHOU Liang,LIU Cong,ZHANG Chang-wei..Curative effect of early endovascular embolization on patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].,2016,(01):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
[9]张 莹 荆林凯 张倩倩 刘 健 张义森 王 坤 穆士卿 杨新健.颈内动脉后交通动脉小动脉瘤破裂危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
 ZHANG Ying,JING Lin-kai,ZHANG Qian-qian,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to rupture of small (diameter ≤5 mm) posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2016,(01):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
[10]朱作磊 综述 罗良生 审校.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的预后相关因素研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):183.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.005 基金项目:上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会卫生科技项目(PW2014D-3);上 海 市 科 学 技 术 委 员 会 科 研 计 划 项 目(14DZ1941204);上海市促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新能力三年行动计划项目(16CR2045B ) 作者单位:200127 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院神经外科(曹佳雨、丁圣豪、赵 兵、樊翊凌、潘耀华、万杰清) 通讯作者:万杰清,E-mail:jieqingwan@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-25