[1]田　其　杨锐博　韩守孟　王军民　陈　刚　陈谦学　李明昌.Tubridge血流导向装置治疗颅内大型未破动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(06):414-418.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.06.004]
　TIAN Qi,YANG Rui-bo,HAN Shou-men,et al.Safety and efficacy of Tubridge flow-diverter devices for patients with large unruptured intracranial aneurysm (report of 8 cases)[J].,2021,26(06):414-418.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.06.004]
点击复制

Tubridge血流导向装置治疗颅内大型未破动脉瘤()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
414-418
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Safety and efficacy of Tubridge flow-diverter devices for patients with large unruptured intracranial aneurysm (report of 8 cases)
文章编号:
1009-153X（2021）06-0414-05
作者:
田　其　杨锐博　韩守孟　王军民　陈　刚　陈谦学　李明昌
作者单位：430060 武汉，武汉大学人民医院神经外科（田　其、杨锐博、韩守孟、王军民、陈　刚、陈谦学、李明昌）
Author(s):
TIAN Qi;  YANG Rui-bo;  HAN Shou-men;  WANG Jun-ming;  CHEN Gang;  CHEN Qian-xue;  LI Ming-chang.
Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
关键词:
颅内动脉瘤; 大型动脉瘤; 未破裂动脉瘤; 血管内治疗; Tubridge血流导向装置; 疗效
Keywords:
Intracranial aneurysm;  Large aneurysm;  Unruptured aneurysm;  Endovascular treatment;  Tubridge flow-diverter devices;  Safety;  Efficacy
分类号:
R 743.9; R 815.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.06.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨Tubridge血流导向装置（TFD）治疗颅内大型未破动脉瘤的安全性和疗效。方法 回顾性分析2018年7月至2019年7月采用TFD治疗的8例颅内大型未破动脉瘤的临床资料，其中3例采用单纯TFD治疗，5例采用TFD+弹簧圈栓塞治疗。结果 8例共8个动脉瘤，共置入Tubridge支架8枚，其中7枚支架均成功置入并打开良好；1枚支架术中部分打开不良，经微导丝按摩后完全打开；支架置入成功率为100%。5例TFD+弹簧圈栓塞治疗术后即刻造影显示Raymond分级Ⅲ级2例，Ⅱ级3例；3例采用单纯TFD置入术后即刻造影显示动脉瘤瘤腔内造影剂明显滞留。术后即刻造影显示脉络膜前动脉、后交通动脉及眼动脉等分支动脉显影通畅，未见明显狭窄。术后复查DSA及颅脑CT未见出血及缺血事件。8例门诊随访6~24个月，4例症状完全消失，3例明显改善，1例体检发现病人手术前后均无症状。5例DSA随访6~12个月，动脉瘤均不显影（Raymond分级Ⅰ级，其中TFD+弹簧圈治疗3例，单纯TFD治疗2例）。结论 TFD治疗颅内大型未破动脉瘤安全性高，短期疗效满意，长期疗效有待进一步研究。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of Tubridge flow-diverter devices (TFD) for the patients with large unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Methods The clinical data of 8 patients with large unruptured intracranial aneurysm, of whom 5 were treated with TFD and coil embolization and 3 with simple TFD, from July 2018 to July 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Results These 8 patients with 8 aneurysms received 8 Tubridge stents which were successfully implanted. Immediate angiography after TFD+coil embolization in 5 patients showed Raymond grade Ⅲ in 2 patients and grade Ⅱ in 3. Immediate angiography after simple TFD implantation in 3 patients showed significant retention of contrast agent in the aneurysms. Immediate postoperative angiography showed that the branch arteries such as the anterior choroidal artery, posterior communicating artery, and ophthalmic artery were patency without obvious stenosis in all the patients. There were no bleeding and ischemic events after the operation. The outpatient follow up (6~24 months) of these 8 patients showed complete disappearance of symptoms in 4 patients, marked improvement in 3, and no symptom before and after the operation in 1. The DSA follow-up (6~12 months) of 5 patients showed Raymond grade Ⅰ in 5 patients, including 3 patients treated with TFD+coil embolization and 2 with simple TFD. Conclusion For large unruptured intracranial aneurysms, TFD is safe and its short outcomes are good, but its long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.

参考文献/References:

[1] Barrow DL, Alleyne C. Natural history of giant intracranial aneurysms and indications for intervention [J]. Clin Neuro-surg, 1995, 42: 214-244.
[2] Zhou Y, Yang PF, Fang YB, et al. A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35(12): 2326-2333.
[3] Hong B, Wang K, Huang Q, et al. Effects of metal coverage rate of flow diversion device on neointimal growth at side branch ostium and stented artery: an animal experiment in rabbit abdominal aorta [J]. Neuroradiology, 2012, 54(8): 849-855.
[4] Liu J M, Zhou Y, Li Y, et al. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the tubridge flowdiverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT) [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39: 807-816.
[5] Turfe Z A, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al. Endovascular coiling versus parent artery occlusion for treatment of caver-nous carotid aneurysms: a meta-analysis [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(4): 250-255.
[6] Gonzalez NR, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, et al. Challenges in theendovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 59(5 Suppl 3): S113-S124, S3-S13.
[7] Chalouhi N, Chitale R, Starke RM, et al. Treatment of recur-rent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6(1): 19-23.
[8] Jankowitz BT, Gross BA, Seshadhri S, et al. Hemodynamic differences between Pipeline and coil-adjunctive intracra-nial stents [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(9): 908-911.
[9] Kallmes D F, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and effi-cacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies [J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 127(4): 775-780.
[10] 赵　瑞，吕　楠，周　宇，等. 血流导向装置治疗椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的单中心临床经验[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2019，35（9）：890-894.
[11] Puffer RC, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, et al. Patency of the oph-thalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2012,116(4):892-896.
[12] Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Whiting A, et al. Treatment of rup-tured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device [J]. Neurosurgery, 2015,76(2):165-172, 172.
[13] Bhogal P, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, et al. The fate of side branches covered by flow diverters-results from 140 patients [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,103:789-798.
[14] 方亦斌，吕　楠，周　宇，等. Tubridge血流导向装置在治疗颅内动脉瘤中覆盖分支血管的安全性分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2019，35（10）：1017-1021.
[15] 李　立，李天晓，邵秋季，等. 国产Tubridge血流导向装置治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤 [J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2019，35（9）：909-913.
[16] Ye G, Zhang M, Deng L, et al. Meta-analysis of the effici-ency and prognosis of intracranial aneurysm treated with flow diverter devices [J]. J Mol Neurosci, 2016, 59(1): 158-167.
[17] Kallmes D F, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retros-pective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multi-center aneurysm treatment study [J]. AJNR Am J Neurora-diol, 2015, 36(1): 108-115.
[18] Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, et al. Aneurysm rupture follow-ing treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment [J]. AJNR Am J Neuro-radiol, 2011, 32(1): 27-33.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾　春　张施远　蒋永明.复合手术与常规夹闭术治疗颈内动脉后交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比研究[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
　ZENG Chun,ZHANG Shi-yuan,JIANG Yong-ming.Analysis of the effects of hybrid surgery on posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a comparison with conventional craniotomy[J].,2016,(06):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
[2]周有东　敖祥生　刘汉东　王志勇　朱耀祖　周达全.支架辅助弹簧圈和单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
　ZHOU You-dong,AO Xiang-sheng,LIU Han-dong,et al.A mata-analysis of curative effects of stent-assisted coiling and simple coiling on intracranial aneurysms and their safety[J].,2016,(06):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
[3]赵　平　王雄伟　汪　雷　马金阳.显微手术和血管内栓塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
　ZHAO Ping,WANG Xiong-wei,WANG Lei,et al.Effect of endovascular treatment on intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with microsurgery[J].,2016,(06):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
[4]李朝晖　王玉贵　张孟超 综述　赵兴利 审校.CT灌注成像在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的 临床应用进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):313.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.021]
[5]刘福德　邓剑平　张　涛　陈　虎　李　帅　王俭博　曲友直　赵振伟.椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管内治疗（附48例分析）[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
　LIU Fu-de,DENG Jian-ping,ZHANG Tao,et al.Endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms (report of 48 cases)[J].,2016,(06):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
[6]吴有志　罗良生　张　健　陈　骅　吴　鸣　刘　振　史　岩.前循环破裂动脉瘤伴脑内血肿的 早期显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):376.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.020]
[7]潘　力　刘　鹏　秦　杰　杨　柳　安学峰　吴　虓　杨　铭　徐国政　马廉亭.Y型支架辅助技术在颅内动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤治疗中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
　PAN Li,LIU Peng,QIN Jie,et al.Application of Y -configuration stent technique to treatment of intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms[J].,2016,(06):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
[8]周　量　刘　丛　张昌伟.早期栓塞术治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
　ZHOU Liang,LIU Cong,ZHANG Chang-wei..Curative effect of early endovascular embolization on patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].,2016,(06):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
[9]张　莹　荆林凯　张倩倩　刘　健　张义森　王　坤　穆士卿　杨新健.颈内动脉后交通动脉小动脉瘤破裂危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
　ZHANG Ying,JING Lin-kai,ZHANG Qian-qian,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to rupture of small (diameter ≤5 mm) posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2016,(06):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
[10]朱作磊 综述　罗良生 审校.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的预后相关因素研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):183.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.020]
[11]高旭,于春泳,董玉书,等.改良血管内逆向回抽技术在颅内大型动脉瘤夹闭术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(07):451.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.002]
　GAO Xu,YU Chun-yong,DONG Yu-shu,et al.Microsurgical treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms using a modified endovascular suction decompression technique with Invatec Mo.Ma device[J].,2017,(06):451.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金（81971870）
通讯作者：李明昌，E-mail：mingcli@whu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-25