[1]葛慧剑 陈希恒 金恒伟等.血流导向装置治疗基底动脉巨大动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(11):823-826.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.002]
 GE Hui-jian,CHEN Xi-heng,JIN Heng-wei,et al.Effectiveness and safety of flow diverter for patients with giant basilar artery aneurysm[J].,2021,26(11):823-826.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.002]
点击复制

血流导向装置治疗基底动脉巨大动脉瘤的疗效分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
823-826
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effectiveness and safety of flow diverter for patients with giant basilar artery aneurysm
文章编号:
1009-153X(2021)11-0823-04
作者:
葛慧剑 陈希恒 金恒伟等
100070 北京,北京市神经外科研究所/首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经介入科(葛慧剑、陈希恒、金恒伟、贺红卫、缪中荣、刘 鹏、李佑祥)
Author(s):
GE Hui-jian CHEN Xi-heng JIN Heng-wei et al
1. Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing 100070, China; 2. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
关键词:
颅内巨大动脉瘤基底动脉动脉瘤血流导向装置疗效
Keywords:
Giant intracranial aneurysm Basilar artery aneurysm Flow diverter Effectiveness Safety
分类号:
R 743.9; R 815.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.11.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨血流导向装置(FD)治疗基底动脉巨大动脉瘤的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2016年7月至2020年7月采用FD治疗的17例基底动脉巨大动脉瘤的临床资料。结果 17例(17个动脉瘤)共置入28枚FD(22枚Pipeline支架,6枚Tubridge支架),成功释放27枚。术后发生并发症共11例(64.7%,11/17),其中缺血6例,出血2例,占位效应加重3例。14例临床随访1~60个月,平均(18.1±16.3)个月;预后良好(改良Rankin量表评分0~2分)11例,重残1例,死亡2例。10例影像学随访3~60个月,平均(17.8±18.9)个月;8例动脉瘤完全闭塞,2例残腔稳定;9例载瘤动脉通畅,1例因术中支架脱入动脉瘤瘤腔内而闭塞基底动脉。结论 对于基底动脉巨大动脉瘤,FD治疗的动脉瘤闭塞率较高,效果良好;但是术后并发症不容忽视,临床应注意防治。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effectiveness and safety of flow diverter (FD) for the patients with giant basilar artery aneurysm (GBAA). Methods The clinical data of 17 patients (17 aneurysms) with GBAA who received endovascular treatment using FD from July 2016 to July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 28 FDs, including 22 Pipeline stents and 6 Tubridge stents, were implanted in these 17 patients and 27 FDs were successfully released. Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients (64.7%, 11/17), including 6 patients of ischemic complications, 2 of hemorrhagic complications and 3 of aggravated space-occupying effect. The clinical follow-up of 14 patients (range, 1~60 months; average, 18.1±16.3 months) showed good prognoses (modified Rankin scale score of 0~2) in 11 patients, severe disability in 1, and death in 2. The radiologic follow-up of 10 patients (range, 3~60 months; average, 17.8±18.9 months) showed complete occlusion of aneurysms in 8 patients and no change of residual lumen in 2; patency of parient arteries in 9 and occlusion of basilar artery in 1 due to intraoperative stent disengagement from aneurysm. Conclusions For the patients with GBAA, endovacular treatment using FD has high aneurysm occlusion rate and good prognosis. However, clinical prevention and treatment measures should be made to reduce the postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ge H, Li Y, Lü X. A challenging entity of unruptured giant saccular aneurysms of vertebrobasilar artery [J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2016, 50(4): 236-240.
[2] Piano M, Valvassori L, Quilici L, et al. Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience[J]. J Neurosurg,2013, 118(2): 408-416.
[3] Nakatomi H, Kiyofuji S, Ono H, et al. Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebro-basilar junction-clinicopathological and surgical outcome [J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 88(1): 82-95.
[4] Mu S, Li C, Yang X, et al. Reconstructive Endovascular treatment of spontaneous symptomatic large or giant verte-brobasilar dissecting aneurysms: clinical and angiographic outcomes [J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2016, 26(3): 291-300.
[5] Zhang YP, Liang F, Zhang YX, et al. Exploring the feasibi-lity of pipeline embolization device compared with stent-assisted coiling to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intra-dural vertebral artery aneurysms [J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 275.
[6] Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis [J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(2): 442-447.
[7] Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Dmytriw AA, et al. Risk of branch occlusion and ischemic complications with the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(7): 1303-1309.
[8] Siddiqui AH, Abla AA, Kan P, et al. Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 116(6): 1258-1266.
[9] Lopes DK, Jang DK, Cekirge S, et al. Morbidity and morta-lity in patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: a subgroup analysis of the international retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device [J]. Neurosurgery, 2018, 83(3): 488-500.
[10] Wang Z, Tian Z, Li W, et al. Variation of mass effect after using a flow diverter with adjunctive coil embolization for symptomatic unruptured large and giant intracranial aneurysms [J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 1191.
[11] Oran I. Flow-diverting stent and delayed intracranial bleed-ing: the case for discussing acquired von Willebrand disease [J]. Platelets, 2021, 32(3): 432-435.
[12] Liang F, Zhang Y, Guo F, et al. Use of pipeline embolization device for posterior circulation aneurysms: single-center experiences with comparison with anterior circulation aneurysms [J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 112: e683-e690.
[13] 赵 瑞,吕 楠,周 宇,等. 血流导向装置治疗椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的单中心临床经验[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2019,35(9):890-894.

相似文献/References:

[1]张振海 沈春森 吴中学 杨新健 穆士卿.颅内巨大动脉瘤的血管内治疗分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(08):469.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.08.008]
 ZHANG Zhen-hai,WU Zhong-xue,MU Shi-qing,et al.Endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms[J].,2015,(11):469.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.08.008]
[2]孙荣辉 向伟楚 吕福群 宋明昊 潘思源 沈春发 白三莉 张少杰 潘 力 赵曰圆 马廉亭.基底动脉动脉瘤合并胚胎型大脑后动脉自发性闭塞的诊治分析(附1例报道并文献复习)[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(09):693.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.09.013]
 SUN Rong-hui,XIANG Wei-chu,Lü Fu-qun,et al.Diagnosis and treatment of patients with basilar artery aneurysm associated with spontaneous occlusion of fetal posterior cerebral artery: report of one case and literature review[J].,2021,26(11):693.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.09.013]
[3]张文华,李亚雄,李岩,等.颅内外高流量分流联合颈内动脉结扎术治疗的巨大症状性颈内动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(01):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.01.005]
 ZHANG Wen-hua,LI Ya-xiong,LI Yan,et al.Clinical efficacy of high-flow extracranial-intracranial bypass combined with internal carotid artery ligation for giant symptomatic cavernous carotid artery aneurysms: report of 4 cases and literature review[J].,2022,27(11):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.01.005]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01