[1]毛紫龙,左威,程超,等.后路枕颈固定复位减压术治疗颅底凹陷症的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(07):529-532.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.07.001]
　MAO Zi-long,ZUO Wei,CHENG Chao,et al.Clinical efficacy of posterior occipitocervical fixation and decompression for patients with basilar invagination[J].,2022,27(07):529-532.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.07.001]
点击复制

后路枕颈固定复位减压术治疗颅底凹陷症的疗效分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2022年07期
页码:
529-532
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical efficacy of posterior occipitocervical fixation and decompression for patients with basilar invagination
文章编号:
1009-153X(2022)07-0529-04
作者:
毛紫龙; 左威; 程超; 张津安; 张雷; 王鹏; 李维新
710021 西安，西安医学院（毛紫龙）；710038 西安，中国人民解放军空军军医大学唐都医院神经外科（左威、程超、张津安、张雷、王鹏、李维新）
Author(s):
MAO Zi-long1;  ZUO Wei2;  CHENG Chao2;  ZHANG Jin-an2;  ZHANG Lei2;  WANG Peng2;  LI Wei-xin2
1.Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an 710021, Chian; 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospial, Air Force Military Medical University, PLA, Xi’an 710038, China
关键词:
颅底凹陷症; 后路枕颈固定复位减压术; 疗效
Keywords:
Basilar Invagination;  Posterior occipitocervical fixation and decompression;  Clinical efficay
分类号:
R682.1+2;R651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.07.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨后路枕颈固定复位减压术治疗颅底凹陷症的效果。方法 回顾性分析2015年6月至2020年1月采用单一后路枕颈固定复位减压术治疗的70例颅底凹陷的临床资料。记录病人报告的日本骨科学会（PRO-JOA）评分，用ΔPRO-JOA判断恢复程度，ΔPRO-JOA=（术后PRO-JOA评分-术前PRO-JOA评分）/（17-术前PRO-JOA评分）×100%，其中≥60%为手术效果较好，<60%为手术效果一般。结果 70例中，A型颅底凹陷[有寰枢椎脱位，寰椎齿状突间距（ADI）≥3 mm]28例，B型颅底凹陷症（无寰枢椎脱位，ADI<3 mm）42例。70例顺利完成手术，无手术死亡病例。70例术后随访12~60个月，平均（36.2±10.3）个月。A型末次随访，24例（85.71%）手术效果较好，4例手术效果一般。B型末次随访，33例（78.57%）手术效果较好，9例手术效果一般。结论 后路固定复位减压术治疗颅底凹陷症，A型和B型都可获得良好的疗效。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficay of posterior occipitocervical fixation and decompression (PCFD) for the patients with basilar invagination (BI). Methods The clinical data of 70 patients with BI who underwent PCFD from June 2015 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient-reported Japanese Orthopaedic Association (PRO-JOA) score was recorded and the ΔPRO-JOA was calculated, with a ΔPRO-JOA ≥60% as good outcome. Results Of 70 patients with BI, 28 patients were classified as type A [atlantoaxial dislocation, atlantodental interval (ADI)≥ 3 mm] and 42 as type B (no atlantoaxial dislocation, ADI<3 mm). All the operations were completed successfully without surgical death. The follow up ranged from 12 months to 60 months with a mean time of (36.2±10.3) months. At last follow up, 24 patients (85.71%) of type A had good outcomes and 33 patient (78.57%) of type B had good outcomes. Conclusions PCFD can achieve good outcomes in the treatment of patients with BI including types A and B.

参考文献/References:

[1]Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Abel MF, et al. Basilar invagination [J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66(3 Suppl): 39-47.
[2]丁崇学，范雁东，潘红利，等. 直接后路加压器械撑开复位枕颈融合术治疗颅底凹陷症合并寰枢椎脱位的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志，2020，25（6）：348-351.
[3]Brito J, Santos BD, Nascimento IF, et al. Basilar invagination associated with chiari malformation type Ⅰ: a literature review [J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2019, 74: e653.
[4]De Oliveira Sousa U, De Oliveira MF, Heringer LC, et al. The effect of posterior fossa decompression in adult Chiarimalformation and basilar invagination: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2018, 41(1): 311-321.
[5]Klekamp J. Treatment of basilar invagination [J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(8): 1656-1665.
[6]Goel A. Basilar invagination: instability is the cause and stabilization is the treatment [J]. Neurospine, 2020, 17(3). 585-587.
[7]Goel A. Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004, 1(3): 281-286.
[8]Liao Y, Pu L, Guo H, et al. Selection of surgical procedures for basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation [J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(10): 1184-1193.
[9]Wang C, Yan M, Zhou HT, et al. Open reduction of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation by transoral anterior atlantoaxial release and posterior internal fixation [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(11): E306-313.
[10]Liu T, Li F, Xiong W, et al. Video-assisted anterior transcervical approach for the reduction of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(15): 1495-1501.
[11]Liu Z, Zhao X, Guan J, et al. Quantitative reduction of basilar invagination: correction target of clivo-axial angle [J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2020, 33(8): E386-E390.
[12]Baysal B, Eser MB, Sorkun M. Radiological approach to basilar invagination type B: reliability and accuracy [J]. J Neuroradiol, 2022, 49(1): 33-40.
[13]Goel A. Instability and basilar invagination [J]. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2012, 3(1): 1-2.
[14]Young RM, Sherman JH, Wind JJ, et al. Treatment of craniocervical instability using a posterior-only approach: report of 3 cases [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21(2): 239-248.
[15]Azimi P, Yazdanian T, Benzel EC, et al. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2021, 30(6): 1411-1439.
[16]Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 19(2): 141-159.
[17]Gerilmez A, Naderi S. A novel perspective for analyzing craniocervical sagittal balance and horizontal gaze [J].
World Neurosurg, 2021, 149: e924-e930.
[18]ì?temen ì, Arslan A, Olguner SK, et al. The effect of straight or lordotic rods on cervical subaxial alignment while fusing C1-C2 [J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 133: e653-e657.
[19]Theodore N. Degenerative cervical spondylosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(2): 159-168.
[20]Wu B, Liu B, Sang D, et al. The association between cervical focal kyphosis and myelopathy severity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy before surgery [J]. Eur Spine J, 2021, 30(6): 1501-1508.
[21]Goel A, Nadkarni T, Shah A, et al. Radiologic evaluation of basilar invagination without obvious atlantoaxial instability (Group B Basilar Invagination): analysis based on a study of 75 patients [J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 95: 375-382.
[22]Goel A, Sathe P, Shah A. Atlantoaxial fixation for basilar invagination without obvious atlantoaxial instability (Group B Basilar Invagination): outcome analysis of 63 surgically treated cases [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 99: 164-170.
[23]Goel A. Indicators of atlantoaxial instability [J]. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2021, 12(2): 103-106.
[24]Goel A, Jain S, Shah A. Radiological evaluation of 510 cases of basilar invagination with evidence of atlantoaxial instability (Group A Basilar Invagination) [J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 110: 533-543.
[25]Goel A. Cervical fusion as a protective response to craniovertebral junction instability: a novel concept [J]. Neurospine, 2018, 15(4): 323-328.
[26]Goel A. Goel’s classification of atlantoaxial "facetal" dislocation [J]. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2014, 5(1): 3-8.

相似文献/References:

[1]丁崇学　范雁东　潘红利　李彦东　罗　坤.直接后路加压器械撑开复位枕颈融合术治疗颅底凹陷症合并寰枢椎脱位的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(06):348.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.06.004]
　DING Chong-xue,FAN Yan-dong,PAN Hong-li,et al.Treatment of basilar invagination associated with atlantoaxial dislocation with direct posterior decompression and occipito-cervical fusion[J].,2020,(07):348.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.06.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2022-05-17收稿，2022-06-21修回）
通讯作者：李维新，E-mail：tangdunaowai@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-31