[1]王亦强　张国安　贾宏波　朱思远.扩散峰度成像鉴别诊断高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤的临床价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(12):730-732.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.12.004]
　WANG Yi-qiang,ZHANG Guo-an,JIA Hong-bo,et al.Value of diffusion peak imaging to differential diagnosis of WHO high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases[J].,2019,(12):730-732.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.12.004]
点击复制

扩散峰度成像鉴别诊断高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤的临床价值()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年12期
页码:
730-732
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-12-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of diffusion peak imaging to differential diagnosis of WHO high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases
文章编号:
1009-153X（2019）12-0730-03
作者:
王亦强　张国安　贾宏波　朱思远
113000 辽宁抚顺，辽宁省健康产业集团抚矿总医院影像科（王亦强、张国安、贾宏波、朱思远）
Author(s):
WANG Yi-qiang;  ZHANG Guo-an;  JIA Hong-bo;  ZHU Si-yuan.
Department of Imaging, Fukuang General Hospital, Liaoning Health Industry Group, Fushun113000, China
关键词:
高级别胶质瘤; 脑转移瘤; 扩散峰度成像; 鉴别诊断
Keywords:
Diffusion kurtosis imaging;  High grade glioma;  Solitary brain metastases;  Differential diagnosis
分类号:
R 739.41; R 445.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.12.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨扩散峰度成像（DKI）鉴别诊断高级别胶质瘤（HGG）和单发脑转移瘤（BM）的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2017年3月至2018年12月收治的23例HGG和19例单发BM的临床资料。所有病人均行MRI扫描及DKI扫描，分析两类肿瘤实质区和瘤周区DKI参数各向异性分数（FA）、平均扩散（MD）及平均峰度（MK）。利用ROC曲线计算敏感度、特异度及曲线下面积（AUC）。结果 HGG和单发BM病人MRI增强均显示不规则环状强化灶。HGG和单发BM实质区DKI参数FA、MD及MK值均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。与单发BM瘤周区相比，HGG瘤周区DKI参数FA和MK值更高（P<0.05），MD值更低（P<0.05）。与DKI参数FA和MD值相比，瘤周区MK值鉴别HGG和单发BM的特异性与灵敏度更高，AUC更大。结论 瘤周区DKI参数FA、MD及MK值在HGG和单发BM鉴别诊断中具有重要的临床价值，且瘤周区MK值的诊断效能更高。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differential diagnosis of WHO high grade gliomas (HGG) and solitary brain metastases (SBM). Methods MRI scan and DKI scan were performed in 23 patients with WHO HGG and 19 patients with SBM. The anisotropy fraction (FA), mean diffusion (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) of tumorous parenchyma and peritumorous area were analyzed and compared between both the groups. The sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results There were no significant differences in FA, MD and MK of the parenchymas between HGG and SBM (P>0.05). The values of FA and MK were significantly higher and the value of MD was significantly lower in the peritumorous area of HGG than those in the peritumorous area of SBM (P<0.05). The specificity and sensitivity of MK in the peritumorous area to the differential diagnosis of HGG and SBM were significantly higher, and its AUC was significantly larger than those of FA and MD. Conclusions The FA, MD and MK in the peritumorous area have important clinical value to the differential diagnosis of HGG and SBM, and the value of MK in the peritumorous area to the differential diagnosis of HGG and SBM is more higher than those of FA and MD.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王晓慧，夏云飞. 高级别胶质瘤放疗的现状与进展[J]. 广 东医学，2017，38: 9-12.
[2] Patchel RA. The management of brain metastases [J]. Cancer Treat Rev，2003, 29: 533-540.
[3] 张家慧，郎　宁，袁慧书. 磁共振扩散峰度成像的临床研 究进展[J]. 广东医学，2018， 4：316-320.
[4] Van CS, Verart J, Sijbers J, et al. Gliomas: difusion kurtosis MR imagingin grading [J]. Radiology, 2012, 263: 492-501.
[5] 张　顺，姚义好，张水霞，等. 脑梗死不同时期的MR 扩散 峰度成像[J]. 中华放射学杂志，2014, 48: 443-447.
[6] 王莹莹，张　焱，程敬亮，等. 磁共振扩散峰度成像在乳腺 良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 放射学实践，2017，32 （2）：135-138.
[7] Poot DH, Dekker AJ, Achten E, et al. Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2010, 29: 819-823.
[8] Zhuo J, Xu S, Proctor JL, et al. Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury[J]. Neuroimage. 2012, 59: 467-477.?
[9] Wu EX, Cheung MM. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for neural tissue characterization [J]. NMR Biomed, 2010, 23: 836-848.
[10] 田士峰，刘爱连，宋清伟，等. 扩散峰度成像定量参数鉴别 子宫内膜浆液性腺癌与内膜样腺癌的价值[J]. 中国医学 影像学杂志，2018，26（2）：120-125.
[11] 林婷婷，李　钢. 脑胶质瘤的综合临床治疗的研究进展 [J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2013，18（5）：316-319.
[12] Jiang RF, Jiang JJ, Zhao LY. Diffusion kurtosis imaging can efficiently assess the glioma grade and cellular proliferation [J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6: 42380-42393.
[13] Tan Y, Wang XC, Zhang H. Differentiation of high-grade- astrocytomas from solitary-brain-metastases: comparing diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84: 2618-2624.
[14] Mah A, Geeraert B, Lebel C. Detailing neuroanatomical development in late childhood and early adolescence using NODDI [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 8: e182340.
[15] Pavlisa G, Rados M, Pavlisa G, et al. The differences of water diffusion between brain tissue infiltrated by tumor and peritumoral vasogenic edema [J]. Clin Imaging, 2009, 33: 96-101.
[16] 曲丽洁，周建军，丁玉芹，等. 磁共振体素内不相干运动成 像和扩散峰度成像在正常肾脏成像中的初步研究[J]. 放 射学实践，2016，31：908-913.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈正和　陈忠平.高级别胶质瘤的治疗现状及思考[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):350.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.010]
[2]毛承亮,唐凯,郑聪颖,等.荧光素钠引导下高级别胶质瘤的手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(02):68.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.002]
　MAO Cheng-liang,TANG Kai,ZHENG Cong-ying,et al.Sodium fluorescein-guided surgery for high-grade gliomas[J].,2017,(12):68.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.002]
[3]王娇燕　孟凡华　刘魏然　魏春晓　林丽萍.SWI在胶质母细胞瘤与单发脑转移瘤鉴别中的价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(01):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.005]
　WANG Jiao-yan,MENG Fan-hua,LIU Wei-ran,et al.Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging in differentiative diagnosis of glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases[J].,2018,(12):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.005]
[4]王　鹏　刘丽娜　王志明　蔡　明.以脑出血为首发症状的绒毛膜癌脑转移1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(06):447.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.06.024]
[5]熊　飞　王　叶　王翅鹏　黄文才　谭惠斌　程少容　姚　顺　曹成龙.ADC直方图鉴别脑转移瘤病理性质的价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(07):452.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.002]
　XIONG Fei,WANG Ye,WANG Chi-peng,et al.Value of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram to differential diagnosis of common pathological types of brain metastases[J].,2018,(12):452.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.002]
[6]胡　平　邓　钢　叶立果等.MRS联合Ki-67鉴别脑转移瘤与高级别胶质瘤的作用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(03):159.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.03.005]
　HU Ping,DENG Gang,YE Li-guo,et al.Role of MRS parameters combined with Ki-67 index in differentiating brain metastases from primary high-grade gliomas[J].,2021,26(12):159.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.03.005]
[7]陈科宇　江普查.瘤周水肿与人脑高级别胶质瘤预后的相关性[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(05):352.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.05.011]
　CHEN Ke-yu,JIANG Pu-cha..Correlation between peritumoral edema of high-grade glioma and patients’ prognoses[J].,2021,26(12):352.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.05.011]
[8]刘宝辉　孙　前　袁凡恩等.高级别胶质瘤的治疗进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(05):380.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.05.022]
[9]潘佳恒　陈　波.胸壁腺泡状软组织肉瘤伴肺、脑转移1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(05):393.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.05.027]
[10]陈思畅　单永治　赵国光.激光间质热疗在脑部疾病治疗中的应用现状[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(08):637.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.08.021]
[11]王翅鹏　黄文才 熊 飞　王 叶　姚 顺　曹成龙　马廉亭　徐国政.ADC直方图在高级别胶质瘤与脑单发转移瘤鉴别中的应用价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(07):449.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.001]
　WANG Chi-peng,HUANG Wen-cai,XIONG Fei,et al.Value of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram to differentiating high-grade glioma from solitary brain metastasis[J].,2018,(12):449.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2019-08-29收稿，2019-08-29修回）
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-23