[1]杨 鑫 邵钰阳 聂 盼等.脑深部电刺激术治疗毁损术后帕金森病的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(12):904-906.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.12.003]
 YANG Xin,SHAO Yu-yang,NIE Pan,et al.Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson’s disease after lesion surgery[J].,2021,26(12):904-906.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.12.003]
点击复制

脑深部电刺激术治疗毁损术后帕金森病的疗效()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2021年12期
页码:
904-906
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson’s disease after lesion surgery
文章编号:
1009-153X(2021)12-0904-03
作者:
杨 鑫 邵钰阳 聂 盼等
430071 武汉,武汉大学中南医院神经外科/功能神经外科中心(杨 鑫、邵钰阳、聂 盼、付 锴、熊文平、张修民、柳 雯、张继波、陈劲草、张 捷)
Author(s):
YANG Xin SHAO Yu-yang NIE Pan FU Kai XIONG Wen-ping ZHANG Xiu-min LIU Wen ZHANG Ji-bo CHEN Jin-cao ZHANG Jie.
Department of Neurosurgery & Functional Neurosurgery Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
关键词:
帕金森病脑深部电刺激术丘脑毁损术苍白球毁损术丘脑底核疗效
Keywords:
Parkinson disease Deep brain stimulation Thalamotomy Pallidotomy Subthalamic nucleus Efficacy Safety
分类号:
R 742.5; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.12.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨脑深部电刺激术(DBS)治疗苍白球或丘脑毁损术后帕金森病的疗效与安全性。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2021年3月毁损术后复发或出现新症状而行DBS治疗的33例帕金森病的临床资料。DBS后6个月,采用统一帕金森病量表(UPDRS)运动功能(UPDRS Ⅲ)评分和生活能力(UPDRS Ⅱ)评分、H-Y分期、简明精神量表评分(MMSE)以及左旋多巴等效日剂量(LEDD)评估疗效以及用药情况;记录刺激频率、脉宽、电压、阻抗,并计算刺激能量。结果 术后随访6个月~8.25年,未出现言语障碍、眼球活动障碍、偏瘫、颅内出血或梗死、癫痫发作、颅内感染病例,无硬件故障;5例因电池耗竭行脉冲发生器置换术。DBS后6个月,UPDRS Ⅲ评分、UPDRS Ⅱ评分、H-Y分期、LEDD均较术前明显降低(P<0.05),而MMSE评分较术前无明显变化(P>0.05);和非毁损侧相比,毁损侧肢体震颤评分改善率明显增高(P<0.05),但僵硬评分改善率、运动迟缓评分改善率均无明显变化(P>0.05);和非毁损侧相比,毁损侧刺激电压和刺激能量明显降低(P<0.05),但刺激频率、脉宽和阻抗无明显变化(P>0.05)。结论 PD病人神经核团毁损术后复发或出现新症状,DBS是安全、有效的,毁损侧DBS后电刺激所需能量及电压更低。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the patients with Parkinson’s disease after the thalamotomy or pallidotomy. Methods The clinical data of 33 patients with Parkinson’s disease who received DBS from January 2013 to March 2021 due to the recurrence or new symptoms after the thalamotomy or pallidotomy were analyzed retrospectively. Six months after the DBS, the motor function (UPDRS Ⅲ) score, the living ability (UPDRS Ⅱ) score of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Scale (UPDRS), the H-Y stage, the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score and the levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) were used to evaluate the efficacy; the stimulation frequency, pulse width, voltage, impedance were recorded and the stimulation energy was calculated. Results The results of postoperative follow-up (range, 6 months~8.25 years) showed no speech disorder, eye movement disorder, hemiplegia, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, epileptic seizure, intracranial infection, and hardware failure. Five patients underwent pulse generator replacement due to the battery exhaustion. Six months after the DBS, UPDRS Ⅲ score, UPDRS Ⅱ score, H-Y stage, and LEDD were significantly lower than those before the operation (P<0.05), while MMSE score had no significant change (P>0.05); Compared with the side without the thalamotomy or pallidotomy, the improvement rate of limb tremor score was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the stimulation voltage and the stimulation energy were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in the side with the thalamotomy or pallidotomy, but the improvement rates of stiffness score and the slow movement score, and the stimulation frequency, pulse width and impedance did not change significantly (P>0.05). Conclusions DBS is a safe and effective treatment method for the PD patients due to the recurrence or new symptoms after the thalamotomy or pallidotomy. The energy and voltage are lower in the side with the thalamotomy or pallidotomy.

参考文献/References:

[1] de Rijk MC, Rocca WA, Anderson DW, et al. A population perspective on diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease [J]. Neurology, 1997, 48(5): 1277-1281.(下转第911页)(下转第906页)
[2] Balestrino R, Schapira AHV. Parkinson disease [J]. Eur J Neurol, 2020, 27(1): 27-42.
[3] Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, et al. MDS clinical diagnosticcriteria for Parkinson’s disease [J]. Mov Disord, 2015, 30: 1591-1601.
[4] Wang Y, Li P, Gong F, et al. Micro lesion effect of theglobus pallidus internus with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease patients [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2017, 159(9): 1727-1731.
[5] Louw DF, Burchiel KJ. Ablative therapy for movement dis-orders: complications in the treatment of movement disor-ders [J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 1998, 9(2): 367-373.
[6] Khabarova EA, Denisova NP, Dmitriev AB, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson disease with prior pallidotomy or thalamo-tomy [J]. Brain Sci, 2018, 8(4): 66.
[7] 石长青,武 剑. 单侧苍白球毁损术治疗不同类型帕金森病的疗效分析[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2007,6(12):1221-1223.
[8] 顾 冲,陈国志,谷凌云,等. 多靶点毁损治疗帕金森病疗效分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2011,24(3):177-179.
[9] 张宇清,李勇杰. 神经核团毁损术治疗帕金森病[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2004,17(3):178-182.
[10] Ramirez-Zamora A, Ostrem JL. Globus pallidus interna or subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: a review [J]. JAMA Neurol, 2018, 75(3): 367-372.
[11] Liu X, Zhang J, Fu K, et al. Microelectrode recording-guided versus intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson disease: a 1-year follow-up study [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 107: 900-905.
[12] Satzer D, Maurer EW, Lanctin D, et al. Anatomic correlates of deep brain stimulation electrode impedance [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015, 86(4): 398-403.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘希尧 王占祥 朱宏伟 叶永造 沈上杭.脑深部电刺激术线头连接处切口改良设计[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(10):628.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.10.017]
[2]欧阳佳 武广永 综述 刘如恩 审校.帕金森病基因治疗研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):187.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.022]
[3]杨振宇 张 捷 付 锴 张继波 赵时雨 王 伟.丘脑底核电刺激术治疗肌张力障碍3例并文献复习[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):41.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.01.013]
[4]管得宁,张 扬,徐 运.帕金森病的发病机制及治疗研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):732.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.031]
[5]潘军红 顾晶晶 周 健 关宇光 栾国明.丘脑前核电刺激术治疗难治性癫痫的围手术期护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(06):388.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.06.007]
[6]姜 磊 邵 华 王西宪 石 鑫 冯兆海 郝玉军.丘脑底核电刺激术治疗帕金森病的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.003]
 JIANG Lei,SHAO Hua,WANG Xi-xian,et al.Curative effect of deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus on Parkinson’s disease[J].,2019,(12):13.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.003]
[7]张 金,李永华,张学春,等.脑深部电刺激术治疗抽动秽语综合症1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(04):196.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.04.002]
[8]付东翔 谭家亮 吴 杰 谷 宇.脑深部电刺激术治疗Meige综合征1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(01):59.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.01.023]
[9]张建英 马立山.DBS对帕金森病病人精神症状及认知功能的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(10):703.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.10.014]
[10]蒋 伟 郐国虎 刘魏华等.双侧丘脑底核脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(10):755.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.004]
 JIANG Wei,KUAI Guo-hu,LIU Wei-hua,et al.Clinical efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson’s disease[J].,2021,26(12):755.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.004]
[11]张 威 李 楠 张海红 马 磊 高金鉴 王学廉 高国栋.丘脑底核与苍白球内侧部电刺激术治疗帕金森病疗效的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(12):718.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.005]
 ZHANG Wei,LI Nan,ZHANG Hai-hong,et al.Meta-analysis of curative effects of electric stimulation of the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus on Parkinson disease[J].,2015,(12):718.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.005]
[12]陈礼道 柳 雯 张 捷 付 锴 张继波 刘学猛 彭启珍 丁 伟.脂质头皮标志物在脑深部电刺激术针道设计中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(09):619.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.09.004]
 CHEN Li-dao,LIU Wen,ZHANG Jie,et al.Application of lipid scalp markers to the design of electrode track for deep brain stimulation in patients with movement disorders[J].,2017,(12):619.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.09.004]
[13]陈宇昆 综述 王学廉 审校.脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病新进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(01):56.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.024]
[14]陈礼道 综述 张 捷 审校.帕金森病脑深部电刺激术后程控策略[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(07):506.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.021]
[15]郭 松 任志伟 胡永生等.单纯影像定位与微电极辅助定位在帕金森病手术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(03):149.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.03.002]
 GUO Song,REN Zhi-wei,HU Yong-sheng,et al.Simple imaging-guided versus microelectrode recording-guided deep brain stimulaton for patients with Parkinson’s disease[J].,2021,26(12):149.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.03.002]
[16]邵钰阳,杨鑫,聂盼,等.交叉电脉冲在帕金森病DBS后程控中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(11):889.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.11.003]
 SHAO Yu-yang,YANG Xin,NIE Pan,et al.Application of interleaving stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease after deep brain stimulation[J].,2022,27(12):889.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.11.003]
[17]王宇航,吕坤,鄂语乾,等.麻醉方式和微电极记录对脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病效果的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2024,29(06):321.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.001]
 WANG Yu-hang,Lü Kun,E Yu-qian,et al.Effects of anesthesia method and microelectrode recording on outcomes of deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease[J].,2024,29(12):321.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:科技部国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0105900)
通讯作者:张 捷,E-mail:zhangjie8790@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01