[1]王林林,张亮,袁致海,等.神经内镜手术与钻孔引流术治疗分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2024,29(06):355-357361.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.008]
　WANG Lin-lin,ZHANG Liang,YUAN Zhi-hai,et al.Therapeutic efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery and burr hole drainage for segmented chronic subdural hematomas[J].,2024,29(06):355-357361.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.008]
点击复制

神经内镜手术与钻孔引流术治疗分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
29
期数:
2024年06期
页码:
355-357361
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Therapeutic efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery and burr hole drainage for segmented chronic subdural hematomas
文章编号:
1009-153X（2024）06-0355-03
作者:
王林林; 张亮; 袁致海; 杨磊; 王凤鹿; 高文文; 赵海康
710038西安，西安医学院第二附属医院神经外科（王林林、张亮、袁致海、杨磊、王凤鹿、高文文、赵海康）
Author(s):
WANG Lin-lin;  ZHANG Liang;  YUAN Zhi-hai;  YANG Lei;  WANG Feng-lu;  GAO Wen-wen;  ZHAO Hai-kang
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Medical School, Xi'an 710038, China
关键词:
分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿; 神经内镜手术; 钻孔引流术; 疗效
Keywords:
Separated chronic subdural hematoma;  Endoscopic surgery;  Burr hole drainage;  Efficacy
分类号:
R 651.1+5; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较神经内镜手术与钻孔引流术治疗分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2021年12月手术治疗的92例分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的临床资料。35例采用神经内镜手术治疗（内镜组），57例采用钻孔引流术治疗（引流组）。术后随访6个月，记录术后并发症、死亡及血肿复发情况，采用改良Rankin量表（mRS）评分评估预后。结果 两组术后6个月mRS评分、术后并发症发生率及病死率均无明显差异（P>0.05）。内镜组术后复发率（0）明显低于引流组（15.8%，9/57；P=0.035）。结论 与钻孔引流术相比，神经内镜手术治疗分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿疗效相当，但是术后复发率更低。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of neuroendoscopic surgery and burr hole drainage for patients with septated chronic subdural hematoma (sCSDH). Methods The clinical data of 92 patients with sCSDH treated by surgery from January 2014 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five patients were treated with neuroendoscopic surgery (endoscopy group), and 57 patients were treated with burr hole drainage (drainage group). Postoperative follow-up was conducted for 6 months. Postoperative complications, death, and hematoma recurrence were recorded. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate the prognosis. Results There were no significant differences in the 6-month mRS score, postoperative complication rate and mortality rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative recurrence rate in the endoscopy group (0) was significantly lower than that (15.8%, 9/57) in the drainage group (P=0.035). Conclusion Compared with burr hole drainage, neuroendoscopic surgery has equivalent therapeutic efficacy for patients with sCSDH, but has a lower postoperative recurrence rate.

参考文献/References:

[1]WAKAI S, HASHIMOTO K, WATANABE N, et al. Efficacy of closed-system drainage in treating chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective comparative study[J]. Neurosurgery, 1990, 26(5): 771-773.
[2]MIRANDA LB, BRAXTON E, HOBBS J, et al. Chronic subduralhematoma in the elderly: not a benign disease[J]. J Neurosurg, 2011, 114(1): 72-76.
[3]DENG J, WANG F, WANG H, et al. Efficacy of neuroendoscopictreatment for septated chronic subdural hematoma[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 12: 765109.
[4]BERHOUMA M, JACQUESSON T, JOUANNEAU E. The minimally invasive endoscopic management of septated chronic subdural hematomas: surgical technique[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2014, 156(12): 2359-2362.
[5]ZHANG J, CHEN J. The therapeutic effects of craniotomy versusendoscopic-assisted trepanation drainage for isolated chronic subdural haematoma (ICSH): a single-centre long-term retrospective comparison study[J]. Brain Res Bull, 2020, 161: 94-97.
[6]SALE D. Single versus double burr hole for drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: randomized controlled study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 146: e565-e567.
[7]HAN HJ, PARK CW, KIM EY, et al. One vs. two burr hole craniostomy in surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(2): 87-92.
[8]KANSAL R, NADKARNI T, GOEL A. Single versus double burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas: a study of 267 cases[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2010, 17(4): 428-429.
[9]ZHANG J, LIU X, FAN X, et al. The use of endoscopic-assisted burr-hole craniostomy for septated chronic subdural haematoma: aretrospective cohort comparison study[J]. Brain Res, 2018, 1678: 245-253.
[10]AMANO T, MIYAMATSU Y, OTSUJI R, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic treatment for chronic subdural hematoma surgery[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2021, 92: 78-84.
[11]YADAV YR, RATRE S, PARIHAR V, et al. Endoscopic management of chronic subdural hematoma[J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2020, 81(4): 330-341.
[12]SINGH H, PATIR R, VAISHYA S, et al. Endoscopic evacuation of septated chronic subdural hemorrhage--technical considerations, results, and outcome[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2022, 13: 8.
[13]LI B, LI QL, WAN JX, et al. Neuroendoscopic treatment of septated chronic subdural hematoma[J]. Chin J Endosc, 2022, 28(11): 83-88.李　彪，李庆腊，万金鑫，等. 分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的神经内镜治疗效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志，2022，28（11）：83-88.

相似文献/References:

[1]张文华　谢　蒙　王　旋　林敏华.内镜手术与显微手术治疗垂体瘤疗效的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(02):78.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.02.004]
　ZHANG Wen-hua,XIE Meng,WANG Xuan,et al.Endoscopic surgery and microsurgery for pituitary adenomas: a Meta analysis[J].,2015,(06):78.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.02.004]
[2]赵建平,张红波,穆林森,等.内镜下经鼻蝶术后迟发性鼻出血的护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):794.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.025]
[3]丁伟龙　王向宇　王晓东.神经内镜手术和显微手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血疗效的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(07):463.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.005]
　DING Wei-long,WANG Xiang-yu,WANG Xiao-dong..Comparison of endoscopic surgery and craniotomy for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis[J].,2018,(06):463.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.07.005]
[4]李茂雷　栾　雷　李录华　刘　阳　丰育功.显微镜下和神经内镜下手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(03):171.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.03.016]
[5]钟　琪　何　林　刘　平　郑燎原.神经内镜手术治疗高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(02):91.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.02.010]
　ZHONG Qi,HE Lin,LIU Ping,et al.Effect of neuroendoscopic surgery on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J].,2020,(06):91.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.02.010]
[6]谢燕梅　陈伟明　陈才奋.非功能性垂体腺瘤神经内镜下经蝶入路术后迟发性低钠血症的影响因素[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(06):388.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.06.016]
[7]吴春富　梁建广　马思原　陆　华　何新俊　杜延平　金　东.自制鹭嘴式神经内镜鞘辅助神经内镜手术治疗高血压性脑室出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(07):427.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.07.004]
　WU Chun-fu,LIANG Jian-guang,MA Si-yuan,et al.Endoscopic surgery assisted by self- made egret's besky neuroendoscopic sheath for hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage[J].,2020,(06):427.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.07.004]
[8]王凤伟　杨金庆　薛　勇.3D-Slicer软件辅助神经内镜手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(07):470.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.07.018]
[9]王学建　蒋晓明.神经内镜手术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿锥颅术后短期复发1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(11):813.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.030]
[10]周朝阳　朱荣岚　姜星星等.神经内镜手术联合脑室外引流术与单纯脑室外引流术治疗脑室出血的疗效比较[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(02):77.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.004]
　ZHOU Chao-yang,ZHU Rong-lan,JIANG Xing-xing,et al.Comparison of curative effect on intraventricular hemo-rrhage: neuroendoscopic surgery combined with extra-ventricular drainage vresus simple extraventricular drainage[J].,2021,26(06):77.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.004]
[11]李乾锋,闵强,罗明,等.分隔型慢性硬膜下血肿的手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(12):718.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2022-06-21收稿，2024-03-11修回）
通信作者：赵海康，Email：zby0910@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-06-30