[1]冯富强　冀培刚　张江红　娄　淼　刘竞辉　王　樑.伽玛刀治疗海绵窦海绵状血管瘤的疗效分析(附19例报道)[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(02):72-74.
　FENG Fu-qiang,JI Pei-gang,ZHANG Jiang-hong,et al.Curative effects of gamma knife radiosurgery on cavernous sinus hemangiomas (report of 19 cases)[J].,2018,(02):72-74.
点击复制

伽玛刀治疗海绵窦海绵状血管瘤的疗效分析(附19例报道)()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
72-74
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Curative effects of gamma knife radiosurgery on cavernous sinus hemangiomas (report of 19 cases)
文章编号:
1009-153X（2018）02-0072-03
作者:
冯富强　冀培刚　张江红　娄　淼　刘竞辉　王　樑
作者单位：710038 西安，第四军医大学唐都医院神经外科
Author(s):
FENG Fu-qiang;  JI Pei-gang;  ZHANG Jiang-hong;  LOU Miao;  LIU Jing-hui;  WANG Liang.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710038, China
关键词:
海绵窦海绵状血管瘤; 伽玛刀治疗; 疗效
Keywords:
Cavernous hemangiomas;  Gamma knife radiosurgery;  Cavernous sinus;  Curative effects
分类号:
R 739.41; R 815.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨伽玛刀治疗海绵窦海绵状血管瘤的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2005 年10月至2014年10月应用伽玛刀进行治疗的19例海绵窦海绵状血管瘤的临床资料；采用50%等剂量曲线覆盖肿瘤周边，平均周边剂量为13 Gy，平均中心剂量25.2 Gy；治疗后随访6~93个月，平均为40.2个月。结果 肿瘤最大径为22~65 mm，平均41 mm，肿瘤平均体积为25.5 cm3。治疗后，所有病人均未出现新的神经功能受损症状，影像学缩小50%以上9例，缩小25%~50%3例，缩小25%以下2例，无变化5例。头痛10例中，改善6例；面部感觉减退7例中，改善5例；视力下降11例中，改善7例；复视8例全部改善。结论 伽玛刀治疗海绵窦海绵状血管瘤安全有效，有良好的控制作用，并可有效地改善临床症状。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effects of gamma knife radiosurgery on cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas (CSCH). Methods The clinical data of 19 patients with CSCH treated by gamma knife radiosurgery in Tangdu Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University from October, 2005 to October, 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The maximum diameters of CSCH ranged from 22 to 65 mm (mean, 41 mm) and the mean volume of CSCH was 25.5 cm3. The 50% iso-dose curve was used to cover the periphery of CSCH and the average peripheral dose was 13 Gy. All the patients were followed up from 6 to 63 months (mean, 40.2 months). Results No new neurological deficit was observed in all the patients after the gamma knife radiosurgery. The neuroimaging examination showed that the volume of CSCH decreased more than 50% in 9 cases, 25%~50% in 3, less than 25% in 2, and was unchanged in 5. The headache was improved in 6 cases (60%, 6/10), the facial sensory disturbance in 5 (71.4%, 5/7), visual power in 7 (63.6%, 7/11), and diplopia in 8 (100%, 8/8). Conclusion Gamma knife radiosurgery is a safe and effective method to treat CSCH.

参考文献/References:

[1] Bansal S, Suri A, Singh M, et al. Cavernous sinus heman- gioma: a fourteen year single institution experience [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2014, 21(6): 968-974.
[2] Linskey ME, Sekhar LN. Cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a series, a review, and an hypothesis [J]. Neurosurgery, 1992, 30: 101-108.
[3] Goel A. The extradural approach to lesions involving the cavernous sinus [J]. Br J Neurosurg, 1997, 11: 134-138.
[4] Jinhu Y, Jianping D, Xin L, et al. Dynamic enhancement features of cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas on conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(3): 577-581.
[5] Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: temporal peri-tumoral enhancement during multiphase dynamic MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2000, 216: 692-697.
[6] Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Nakajima H, et al. Stereotactic radio- surgery for cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma-case report [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 1999, 39(4): 288-290.
[7] Chou CW, Wu HM, Huang CI, et al. Gamma knife surgery for cavernous hemangiomas in the cavernous sinus [J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(3): 611-616.
[8] Ivanov P, Chernov M, Hayashi M, et al. Low-dose gamma knife radiosurgery for cavernous sinus hemangioma: report of 3 cases and literature review [J]. Minim Invasive Neuro- surg, 2008, 51(3): 140-146.
[9] Yamamoto M, Kida Y, Fukuoka S, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for hemangiomas of the cavernous sinus: a seven-institute study in Japan [J]. J Neurosurg, 2010, 112 (4): 772-779.
[10] Anqi X, Zhang S, Jiahe X, et al. Cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma: imaging features and therapeutic effect of gamma knife radiosurgery [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2014, 127: 59-64.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘　静　李　莺.伽玛刀治疗舌咽神经痛患者的护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(05):303.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.017]
[2]李钟铭　宋　薇　柏明涛　王建祯　王社军　唐　红　杜长生.颅眶沟通性视神经鞘脑膜瘤的显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):15.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.01.005]
　LI Zhong-ming,SONG Wei,BAI Ming-tao,et al.Microsurgery through fronto-orbital approach for cranio-orbital optic nerve sheath meningiomas (report of 26 cases)[J].,2015,(02):15.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.01.005]
[3]张广超　王冬旭　方景晖　李海霞.累及视神经的无功能垂体腺瘤的伽玛刀治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(12):809.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.016]
[4]王　涛　许　川　徐国政　向伟楚　祝友红　黄　成.伽玛刀治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(11):651.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.11.004]
　WANG Tao,XU Chuan,XU Guo-zheng,et al.Curative effect of gamma knife on dural arteriovenous fistulas (report of 26 cases)[J].,2019,(02):651.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.11.004]
[5]孙君昭、张剑宁、任文庆、李庆岗、于　新、赵虎林、李　杰、沈春彩.伽玛刀治疗颈静脉球瘤24例临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(09):581.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.002]
　SUN Jun-zhao,ZHANG Jian-ning,REN Wen-qing,et al.Gamma knife surgery for patients with jugular paragangliomas: report of 24 cases[J].,2020,(02):581.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.09.002]
[6]曾子桓　赵　琳　王守森.海绵窦海绵状血管瘤4例报道并文献复习[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(04):285.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.04.019]
[7]梁　鸿　任明亮　李　兵等.孤立性脑室内Rosai-Dorfman病1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(10):810.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.10.021]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-05