[1]王涛,张昊,邢以嵩.颅内动脉瘤再次栓塞术后复发的影响因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(10):621-624.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.10.004]
 WANG Tao,ZHANG Hao,XING Yi Song.Risk factors for repeated recurrence of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization[J].,2023,28(10):621-624.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.10.004]
点击复制

颅内动脉瘤再次栓塞术后复发的影响因素分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
621-624
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk factors for repeated recurrence of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization
文章编号:
1009-153X(2023)10-0621-04
作者:
王涛张昊邢以嵩
252000山东,聊城市第三人民医院神经外科(王涛、张昊、邢以嵩)
Author(s):
WANG Tao ZHANG Hao XING Yi Song
Department of Neurosurgery, The Third People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng 252000, China
关键词:
颅内动脉瘤术后复发血管内栓塞再次复发危险因素
Keywords:
Intracranial aneurysm Repeated recurrence Re-embolization Risk factors
分类号:
R 743.9; R 815.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.10.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨颅内动脉瘤再次栓塞术后复发的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2018年7月至2022年7月再次栓塞治疗的86例初次栓塞术后复发的颅内动脉瘤的临床资料。再次栓塞术后DSA随访,若瘤体显影较前明显改变且清楚或合并破裂出血则为复发。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析再次复发的危险因素。结果 术后DSA随访显示,11例(12.79%)再次复发,75例未复发。多因素logistic回归分析显示,动脉瘤最长径≥10 mm、直接弹簧圈栓塞及术后即刻Raymond分级≥Ⅱ级为颅内动脉瘤再次复发的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于这些危险因素构建列线图,其C-index为0.708(95% CI 0.667~0.808),ROC曲线以评估列线图价值显示,曲线下面积为 0.711(95% CI 0.686~0.813),灵敏度为68.40%,特异度为83.00%。结论 颅内动脉瘤栓塞术后复发再次栓塞术后仍会复发。根据动脉瘤最长径、术后即刻Raymond分级及栓塞方式构建的列线图模型对预测再复发具有良好的价值。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the risk factors for repeated recurrence of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent second endovascular embolization due to recurrence after first endovascular embolization from July 2018 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The reccurrence of aneurysms was diagnosed by DSA when the aneurysmal sac was significantly changed and clear than before or accompanied with bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analysize the risk factors for recurrence after second endovascular embolization. Results According to the DSA, 11 patients (12.79%) relapsed and 75 did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the long-diameter of aneurysms ≥10 mm, direct coil embolization and immediate Raymond grade ≥Ⅱ were independent risk factors for recurrence of intracranial aneurysms after second embolization (P<0.05). A nomogram was constructed based on the above risk factors, whose C-index was 0.708 (95%CI 0.667~0.808). ROC curve showed the area under the curve of the nomogram was 0.711 (95%CI 0.686~0.813), the sensitivity was 68.40%, and the specificity was 83.00%. Conclusions Recurrence of intracranial aneurysms after embolization can occur again after re-embolization. The nomogram model based on the long-diameter of aneurysms, Raymond grade immediately after embolization and embolization method has good value in predicting recurrence.

参考文献/References:

[1]BOLTYENKOV AT, WANG JJ, MALHOTRA A, et al. Optimizing small, low-risk, unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment using game theory [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022, 43(2): 176-180.
[2]SZATMARY Z, MOUNIER J, JANOT K, et al. Bioactiverefinement for endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neuroradiol J, 2021, 34(6): 534-541.
[3]程魁红,赵 刚,张锡武,等. 颅内动脉瘤的支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞的疗效分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(8):633-636.
[4]MONTEIRO A, LAZAR AL, WAQAS M, et al. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Woven Endo Bridge device: a systematic review [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(4): 366-370.
[5]WAQAS M, DOSSANI RH, ALKHALDI M, et al. Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2022, 28(3): 347-357.
[6]MATSUDA Y, TERADA R, YAMADA K, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in an elderly patient with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a case report [J]. Psychogeriatrics, 2021, 21(4): 681-682.
[7]PETER Y, SPEELMAN A, DARIES V. Measurement of the average radiation dose to the local skin and thyroid gland during intracranial aneurysm coil embolization [J]. Radiography (Lond), 2021, 27(2): 255-259.
[8]GAO P, JIN Z, WANG P, et al. Effects of intracranial interventional embolization and intracranial clipping on the cognitive and neurologic function of patients with intracranialaneurysms [J]. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2022, 37(8): 16881698.
[9]PAGANO P, PAIUSAN L, SOIZE S, et al. Intracranial aneurysm treatment with intrasaccular flow disruption: comparison of WEB-21 and WEB-17 systems [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(9): 904-909.
[10]DOGAN A, OZAN DURMAZ M, YüCE G, et al. Treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery aneurysm by flowdiverter: a single-center experience [J]. Neurochirurgie, 2022, 68(6): e60-e67.
[11]SANTORO A, ARMOCIDA D, PAGLIA F, et al. Treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms: long-term outcomes in surgical versus endovascular management [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2022, 45(6): 3759-3770.
[12]HAN HJ, LEE W, KIM J, et al. Incidence rate and predictorsof recurrent aneurysms after clipping: long-term follow-up study of survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. NeurosurgRev, 2022, 45(5): 3209-3217.
[13]YOKOYA S, HINO A, OKA H. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms: gore-tex interposition method for prevention of galvanic corrosion at the clips [J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2020, 81(3): 261-263.
[14]FINGERLIN TJ, RYCHEN J, ROETHLISBERGER M, et al. Long-term aneurysm recurrence and de novo aneurysm formation after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cohort study and systematic review [J]. Neurol Res, 2020, 42(4): 338-345.
[15]MARBACHER S, NIEMEL M, HERNESNIEMI J, et al. Recurrence of endovascularly and microsurgically treated intracranial aneurysms-review of the putative role of aneurysm wall biology [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2019, 42(1): 49-58.
[16]SPIESSBERGER A, VOGT DR, FANDINO J, et al. Formation of intracranial de novo aneurysms and recurrence after neck clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, 132(2): 456-464.
[17]YASUDA R, SATOW T, HASHIMURA N, et al. Usefulness of craniograms in discriminating coiled intracranial aneurysms requiring retreatment [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2022, 62(3): 118-124.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾 春 张施远 蒋永明.复合手术与常规夹闭术治疗颈内动脉后交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比研究[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
 ZENG Chun,ZHANG Shi-yuan,JIANG Yong-ming.Analysis of the effects of hybrid surgery on posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a comparison with conventional craniotomy[J].,2016,(10):257.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.001]
[2]周有东 敖祥生 刘汉东 王志勇 朱耀祖 周达全.支架辅助弹簧圈和单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
 ZHOU You-dong,AO Xiang-sheng,LIU Han-dong,et al.A mata-analysis of curative effects of stent-assisted coiling and simple coiling on intracranial aneurysms and their safety[J].,2016,(10):274.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.006]
[3]赵 平 王雄伟 汪 雷 马金阳.显微手术和血管内栓塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
 ZHAO Ping,WANG Xiong-wei,WANG Lei,et al.Effect of endovascular treatment on intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with microsurgery[J].,2016,(10):281.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.008]
[4]李朝晖 王玉贵 张孟超 综述 赵兴利 审校.CT灌注成像在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的 临床应用进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):313.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.021]
[5]刘福德 邓剑平 张 涛 陈 虎 李 帅 王俭博 曲友直 赵振伟.椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管内治疗(附48例分析)[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
 LIU Fu-de,DENG Jian-ping,ZHANG Tao,et al.Endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms (report of 48 cases)[J].,2016,(10):353.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.011]
[6]吴有志 罗良生 张 健 陈 骅 吴 鸣 刘 振 史 岩.前循环破裂动脉瘤伴脑内血肿的 早期显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):376.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.020]
[7]潘 力 刘 鹏 秦 杰 杨 柳 安学峰 吴 虓 杨 铭 徐国政 马廉亭.Y型支架辅助技术在颅内动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤治疗中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
 PAN Li,LIU Peng,QIN Jie,et al.Application of Y -configuration stent technique to treatment of intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms[J].,2016,(10):394.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.002]
[8]周 量 刘 丛 张昌伟.早期栓塞术治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(07):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
 ZHOU Liang,LIU Cong,ZHANG Chang-wei..Curative effect of early endovascular embolization on patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].,2016,(10):410.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.07.007]
[9]张 莹 荆林凯 张倩倩 刘 健 张义森 王 坤 穆士卿 杨新健.颈内动脉后交通动脉小动脉瘤破裂危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
 ZHANG Ying,JING Lin-kai,ZHANG Qian-qian,et al.Analysis of risk factors related to rupture of small (diameter ≤5 mm) posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2016,(10):138.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.002]
[10]朱作磊 综述 罗良生 审校.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的预后相关因素研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):183.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(2023-06-25收稿,2023-09-12修回)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-31