[1]孙奇,王翼,边世春,等.颅内破裂动脉瘤治疗策略与预后影响因素：单中心1572例倾向性评分匹配分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(12):673-677.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.001]
　SUN Qi,WANG Yi,BIAN Shi-chun,et al.Therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms based on propensity score matching analysis: a single-center retrospective cohort study of 1 572 cases[J].,2023,28(12):673-677.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.001]
点击复制

颅内破裂动脉瘤治疗策略与预后影响因素：单中心1572例倾向性评分匹配分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年12期
页码:
673-677
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms based on propensity score matching analysis: a single-center retrospective cohort study of 1 572 cases
文章编号:
1009-153X（2023）12-0673-05
作者:
孙奇; 王翼; 边世春; 安学锋; 秦杰; 韦可; 蔡彦超; 雷颉; 杨铭; 黄河; 马廉亭
430070武汉，中部战区总医院神经外科（孙奇、王翼、安学锋、秦杰、韦可、蔡彦超、雷颉、杨铭、黄河、马廉亭）；030001太原，联勤保障部队第九八五医院神经外科（孙奇、边世春）
Author(s):
SUN Qi1; 2;  WANG Yi1;  BIAN Shi-chun2;  AN Xue-feng1;  QIN Jie1;  WEI Ke1;  CAI Yan-chao1;  LEI Jie1;  YANG Ming1;  HUANG He1;  MA Lian-ting1
1. Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. Department of Neurosurgery, The 985th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Taiyuan 030001, China
关键词:
颅内破裂动脉瘤; 显微夹闭术; 血管内栓塞; 预后; 危险因素
Keywords:
Intracranial ruptured aneurysms;  Microsurgical clipping;  Endovascular embolization;  Prognosis;  Risk factor
分类号:
R 743.9; R 651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨显微手术夹闭与血管内栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的预后及其影响因素，为颅内破裂动脉瘤的治疗提供更多参考。方法 回顾性分析2013年6月至2023年6月收治的1 572例颅内破裂动脉瘤的临床资料，其中显微手术夹闭407例（夹闭组），血管内栓塞1 165例（栓塞组）。出院时按GOS评分评估预后，其中1~3分为预后不良，4~5分为预后良好。结果 栓塞组出院时预后良好率（88.3%）明显高于夹闭组（75.4%；P<0.05），而且栓塞组住院时间（14 d；IQR 11~18 d）明显少于夹闭组（16 d；IQR 13~25 d；P<0.05）；但是两组病人术前Hunt-Hess分级、颅内血肿、动脉瘤部位存在显著差异（P<0.05）。通过倾向性评分匹配（PSM）后两组各纳入336例，分析结果显示栓塞组出院时预后良好率（81.0%）与夹闭组（81.8%）无统计学差异（P>0.05），但栓塞组住院时间（10 d；IQR 8~11 d）仍明显少于夹闭组（16 d；IQR 13~22 d；P<0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示，年龄≥60岁、发病时间>72 h、合并颅内血肿、术前Hunt-Hess分级Ⅳ~Ⅴ是颅内破裂动脉瘤预后不良的独立危险因素（P<0.05）。夹闭组共随访307例，动脉瘤复发率为1.9%；栓塞组共随访1 029例，动脉瘤复发率为7.3%；夹闭组动脉瘤复发率明显低于栓塞组（P<0.05）；PSM分析后两组各纳入275例，夹闭组动脉瘤复发率（2.2%）仍明显低于栓塞组（6.6%；P<0.05）。结论 显微手术夹闭与血管内栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的预后均较好，栓塞治疗住院时间较短、复发率较高，临床应根据病人病情个体化选择。病人年龄、发病时间、颅内血肿、Hunt-Hess分级为病人预后的独立影响因素，临床上应加以重视。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the efficacy of microsurgical clipping and endovascular embolization for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA) and the RIA patients' prognotic factors, in order to provide more reference for the treatment of RIA. Methods The clinical data of 1 572 patients with RIA, of whom 407 patients underwent microsurgical clipping (clipping group) and 1 165 patients underwent endovascular embolization (embolization group), from June 2013 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognoses of these patients were evaluated by the GOS score at discharge, with a GOS score of 1~3 as poor prognosis and a GOS score of 4~5 as good prognosis. Results The rate of good prognosis in the embolization group (88.3%) was significantly higher than that (75.4%) in the clipping group (P<0.05), and the length of hospital stay in the embolization group (14 d; IQR 11~18 d) was significantly shorter than that (16 d; IQR 13~25 d) in the clipping group (P<0.05). However, there were significant differences in preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, intracranial hematoma and aneurysm site between the two groups (P<0.05). After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, 336 patients were included in each of the two groups. The PSM analysis results showed that there was no significant difference in the rate of good prognosis at discharge between the embolization group (81.0%) and the clipping group (81.8%; P>0.05), but the length of hospital stay in the embolization group (10 d; IQR 8~11 d) was significantly shorter than that (16 d; IQR 13~22 d) in the clipping group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥60 years, onset time >72 h, intracranial hematoma and preoperative Hunt-Hess grade Ⅳ~Ⅴ were independent risk factors for poor prognoses of patients with RIA (P<0.05). In the clipping group, 307 patients were followed up, and the recurrence rate was 1.9%. In the embolization group, 1 029 patients were followed up, and the recurrence rate was 7.3%. The recurrence rate in the clipping group was significantly lower than that in the embolization group (P<0.05). After PSM analysis, 275 patients were included in each group, and the recurrence rate of clipping group (2.2%) was significantly lower than that (6.6%) of the embolization group (P<0.05). Conclusions Both microsurgical clipping and endovascular embolization have good efficacy for patients with RIA, and embolization has a short hospital stay and a high recurrence rate. In clinic, the selection should be individualized according to the patient's condition. Patients' age, onset time, intracranial hematoma and Hunt-Hess grade are independent prognostic factors of patients with RIA.

参考文献/References:

[1]ZHANG J, LO YL, LI MC, et al. Risk of re-rupture, vasospasm, or re-stroke after clipping or coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: long-term follow-up with a propensity score-matched, population-based cohort study [J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(11): 1209.
[2]DAGA K, TANEJA M, VENKETASUBRAMANIAN N. Small intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage: is the size criterion for risk of rupture relevant [J]? Case Rep Neurol, 2020, 12(Suppl 1): 161-168.
[3]刘健伟，程　矫，甄　勇，等. 术后早期脑电双频指数对高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血病人意识恢复的预测价值[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2023，28（8）：493-496.
[4]张　莹，罗　斌，康慧斌，等. Pipeline栓塞装置治疗大脑中动脉动脉瘤的疗效：一项回顾性多中心研究[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2023，28（4）：225-229.
[5]彭俊强，赵文元，陈劲草. 球囊辅助夹闭术治疗颅内大型和巨大型动脉瘤[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（9）：726-729.
[6]秦显尧，韩守孟，魏　恒，等. 脉络膜前动脉动脉瘤的外科治疗分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2022，27（4）：241-244.
[7]IRIE K, MURAYAMA Y, URASHIMA M, et al. Japanese subarachnoid aneurysm trial of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 1863 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neurol Med Chir（Tokyo), 2022, 62(5): 231-237.
[8]FOTAKOPOULOS G, ANDRADE-BARAZARTE H, TJAHJADI M, et al. Clipping versus coiling in ruptured basilar apex aneurysms: a meta-analysis [J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2021, 31(3): 301-309.
[9]SHAO B, WANG J, CHEN Y, et al. Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 127: e353-e365.
[10]中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会，中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志，2021，18（8）：546-574.
[11]倪　恒，赵林波，刘　圣，等. 血管内治疗低级别破裂前交通动脉动脉瘤合并颅内血肿的临床分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2022，38（1）：65-69.
[12]吴　珂，杨晓滨，李德康，等. 早期不同时机显微夹闭手术 治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 生物医学 工程与临床，2021，25（6）：702-708.
[13]费文静，陈　阳，石　丹，等. 76例Hunt-Hess分级Ⅳ-Ⅴ 级颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期的管理经验[J]. 临床神经外科 杂志，2022，19（2）：202-205.
[14]谭育志，韦可聪，韦　晗，等. 不同支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治 疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效及其并发症比较[J]. 川北医学 院学报，2023，38（8）：1041-1044.
[15]王　峻，刘仁忠，徐亚青，等. 球囊辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅 内宽颈动脉瘤28例临床分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2017，22（7）：499-501.
[16]孟　雷，栾立明，许尚臣，等. 蛛网膜下腔出血急性期采用双微导管技术治疗破裂性宽颈动脉瘤（附21例报道）[J]. 中国急救医学，2011，31（6）：566-568.
[17]马　可，廖　晓，吕华东，等. 支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比[J]. 临床和 实验医学杂志，2021，20（11）：1216-1219.
[18]王黎明，袁　璞，孙　威，等. 栓塞联合支架置入治疗急性 期破裂颅内动脉瘤的效果研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志，2023，31（1）：47-51.
[19]GOERTZ L, LIEBIG T, PENNIG L, et al. Propensity scoreadjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 21742.
[20]吕　斌，王　君，杜志华，等. 80岁以上高龄颅内动脉瘤破裂病人神经介入治疗体会[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志，2021，23（6）：625-628.
[21]GAUDINO C, NAVONE SE, DA ROS V, et al. Incidence of intra-procedural complications according to the timing of endovascular treatment in ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Front Neurol, 2023, 13: 1096651.
[22]赖年升，张兵兵，吴德刚，等. 血管内治疗高龄颅内破裂动脉瘤患者预后影响因素分析[J]. 皖南医学院学报，2023， 42（1）：43-45，49.
[23]林博丽，杨运俊，陈丽芳，等. 不同年龄人群前交通动脉瘤 发生的临床特征及破裂风险分析[J]. 中国医师进修杂志，2019，42（6）：546-551.
[24]段永红，梁日初，廖勇仕，等. 表现为单纯颅内血肿的颅内 破裂动脉瘤临床分析并文献复习[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志，2020，17（5）：252-258.
[25]黄海林，王晓毅，成　刚，等. 颅内破裂动脉瘤伴脑内血肿 夹闭术后预后影响因素[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志， 2020，25（12）：859-860.
[26]QIN F, LIU J, ZHAO X, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured very small intracranial aneurysms: complications, recurrence rate, and clinical outcomes [J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 12: 767649.

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓燕　张　穗　宋利亚.颅内破裂动脉瘤急诊夹闭术围手术期护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):308.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.019]
[2]伍　杰　杨　铭　潘　力　蔡明俊　刘　鹏　秦　杰　杨　柳　安学锋　李国栋　马廉亭.颅内破裂动脉瘤合并脑内血肿的复合手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):193.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.001]
　WU Jie,YANG Ming,PAN Li,et al.Clinical observation of hybrid surgery on ruptured intracranial aneurysms associated with cerebral hematomas (report of 5 cases)[J].,2016,(12):193.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.001]
[3]符传艺　陈健龙　张　茂　刘朝晖　黄垂学　黄　军　马建荣　赵建农.表现为脑室出血的颅内破裂动脉瘤的诊治[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):234.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.014]
[4]郑鉴峰　郭宗铎　张晓冬　朱　继　何朝晖　孙晓川.开颅夹闭术和血管内栓塞术治疗老年前交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):150.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.006]
　ZHENG Jian-feng,GUO Zong-duo,ZHANG Xiao-dong,et al.Craniotomy clipping and interventional treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms in elderly patients: comparison of curative effects[J].,2016,(12):150.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.006]
[5]李玉龙　方兴根　李真保　吴德刚　赖年升　赵心同　徐善水　狄广福.血管内治疗颈内动脉床突旁破裂动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):79.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.006]
　LI Yu-long,FANG Xing-gen,LI Zhen-bao,et al.Endovascular embolization of ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms (report of 26 cases)[J].,2016,(12):79.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.006]
[6]胡　骁　周林裕　王　克　邓剑平　赵振伟.支架辅助血管内栓塞前交通动脉破裂动脉瘤的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):82.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.007]
　HU Xiao,ZHOU Lin-yu,WANG Ke,et al.Curative effect of stent-assisted endovascular embolization on ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms[J].,2016,(12):82.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.007]
[7]申汉威　李俊卿　李红星　汪立刚　杨孔宾.颅内破裂动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术后脑积水发生率的比较分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):140.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.004]
　SHEN Han-wei,LI Jun-qing,LI Hong-xing,et al.Clinical study and Meta-analysis of incidences of hydrocephalus after microsurgery and endovascular embolization in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J].,2015,(12):140.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.004]
[8]王玉贵　李朝晖　郭永川　贾翊平　梁世鹏　刘德华.眶上外侧入路与翼点入路显微手术治疗急性期前循环破裂动脉瘤的对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):452.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.002]
　WANG Yu-gui,LI Chao-hui,GUO Yong-chuan,et al.Microsurgery through lateral supraorbital approach for acute ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms[J].,2016,(12):452.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.002]
[9]邓民强　潘　轲　田仁富　王国堰　向春晖.眶上外侧入路与翼点入路手术治疗急性期颅内前循环破裂动脉瘤的临床对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(10):606.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.012]
　DENG Min-qiang,PAN Ke,TIAN Ren-fu,et al.Microsurgery for ruptured intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms at acute stage: supraorbital lateral approach vs. pterional approach[J].,2016,(12):606.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.012]
[10]李　明,党　伟,胡志卿,等.早期栓塞和手术夹闭颅内破裂动脉瘤的疗效及安全性[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):759.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.009]
　LI Ming,DANG Wei,HU Zhi-qing,et al.Evaluation of effect of early interventional treatment on ruptured incranial aneurysms and its safety[J].,2016,(12):759.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.009]
[11]钟伟健　廖旭兴　董安石　刘鑫鑫　罗　杰　周思捷　梁铭钦　王　辉.T型动脉瘤夹夹闭颅内破裂宽颈微小动脉瘤24例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(04):288.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.04.020]
[12]张道宝　陈　舒　吴虹刚　游国亮　雷　波　万晓强　郑念东.改良Paine点穿刺脑室外引流术及终板造瘘术在颅内前循环破裂动脉瘤急性期夹闭术中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(07):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.07.010]
　ZHANG Dao-bao,CHEN Shu,WU Hong-gang,et al.Application of extraventricular drainage through modified Paine point puncture and lamina terminalis fenestration during clipping ruptured intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms at acute stage[J].,2021,26(12):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.07.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2023-08-15收稿，2023-10-23修回）
通讯作者：黄　河，E-mail：hh403@qq.com
马廉亭，E-mail：mlt1937@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-31