[1]李利彪　李　鹏　陈冬梅　于建设　韩志强.颈动脉内膜剥脱术中不同麻醉技术的联合应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(05):280-283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.008]
　LI Li-biao,LI Peng,CHEN Dong-mei,et al.Application of different techniques of anesthesia to carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses[J].,2015,(05):280-283.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.008]
点击复制

颈动脉内膜剥脱术中不同麻醉技术的联合应用()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
280-283
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2015-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of different techniques of anesthesia to carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses
文章编号:
1009-153X（2015）05-0280-04
作者:
李利彪　李　鹏　陈冬梅　于建设　韩志强
010050 呼和浩特，内蒙古医科大学附属医院麻醉科
Author(s):
LI Li-biao;  LI Peng;  CHEN Dong-mei;  YU Jian-she;  HAN Zhi-qiang.
Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhehot 010050, China
关键词:
症状性颈内动脉狭窄; 颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术; 麻醉
Keywords:
Symptomatic carotid stenoses;  Carotid endarterectomy;  Anesthesia
分类号:
R 651.1+2; R 614
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.05.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术（CEA）中不同麻醉技术的效果和安全性。方法 选择312例需行CEA患者，依据麻醉方法分为4组：Ⅰ组，46例，常规全麻；Ⅱ组，53例，在Ⅰ组基础上，气管插管前用2%利多卡因5 ml行喉及气管内表麻2 min后插管；Ⅲ组，101例，在Ⅱ组基础上，在手术开始前用0.25%罗哌卡因行患侧颈丛神经阻滞；Ⅳ组，112例，在Ⅲ组基础上，术中暴露颈动脉后用1%利多卡因1 ml行颈动脉窦浸润麻醉。分析4组进入手术室（T0）、诱导气管插管成功后1 min（T1）、颈动脉阻断即刻（T2）、颈动脉松开即刻（T3）、术毕拔管（T4）和术毕1 h（T5）心率（HR）和平均动脉压（MAP）变化以及术中不良事件、术后并发症、麻醉药物用量差异。结果 与Ⅱ~Ⅳ组相比，Ⅰ组T1和T4时刻HR和MAP明显升高（P<0.05），术中血压增高、心动过速发生率明显增高（P<0.05）。Ⅰ、Ⅱ组异丙酚和瑞芬太尼用量、病人清醒视觉模拟疼痛量表评分明显高于Ⅲ、Ⅳ型（P<0.05）。Ⅳ组术中心动过缓和低血压发生率明显低于其余3组（P<0.05）。结论 CEA患者采用全麻联合气管内表面麻醉、颈丛神经阻滞或颈动脉窦阻滞可以稳定该类病人术中的血流动力学，减少全麻药的用量，提供良好的术后镇痛效果。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the safety of different local anesthesias including the airway surface anesthesia, cervical plexus block anesthesia and infiltration anesthesia of carotid sinus after the systemic anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and their effects in the patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses. Method Three hundred and twelve patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses, who underwent CEA, were divided into 4 groups, i.e. group Ⅰ (n=46) in which the routine systemic anesthesia (RSA) was performed, group Ⅱ (n=53) in which RSA and the airway surface anesthesia before the tracheal intubation were performed, group Ⅲ (n=101) in which RSA, the airway surface anesthesia before the tracheal intubation and the cervical plexus block anesthesia were performed and group Ⅳ (n=112) in which the infiltration anesthesia of the carotid sinus was performed on the basis of the anesthesias in group Ⅲ. The safety of the anesthesias and their effects were compared among all the groups. Results The heart rate (HR) was significantly faster and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly higher in group Ⅰ than those in the other three groups immediately after the successful intubation and immediately after the extraction of the tube from the airway (P<0.05). The rates of occurrences of tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension and hypotension were significantly lower in group Ⅳ than those in the other three groups (P<0.05). The scores of visual analogue scale were significantly higher and the dosage of propofol and remifentanil was significantly bigger in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ than those in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ (P<0.05). Conclusions The rate of occurrence of poor cardiovascular event and dosage of anesthetics used for CEA may be reduced, and the good analgesia effect after CEA may be reached by the systemic anesthesia combined with the local anesthesias including the airway surface anesthesia, cervical plexus block anesthesia and infiltration anesthesia of the carotid sinus in the patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses.

参考文献/References:

[1] 韩　涛，焦立群，凌　锋，等. 中国颈动脉切除术的文献评 价与现状[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志，2014，11（1）：1-5.
[2] Yepes Temio MJ, Lillo Cuevas M. Anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a review [J]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2011, 58(1): 34-41.
[3] 焦　欣，王照辉，藏　敏. 一过性脑缺血患者颈动脉超声 观测分析[J]. 长春中医药大学学报，2009，25（5）：764.
[4] 刁永鹏，刘昌伟，郭小军，等. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗高龄 颈动脉狭窄患者的安全性和有效性分析[J]. 中国普外基 础与临床杂志，2014，21（1）：60-64.
[5] Samanta S, Samanta S, Panda N, et al. A unique anesthesia approach for carotid endarterectomy: combination of general and regional anesthesia [J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2014, 8(2): 290-293.
[6] 韩志国，余淑敏，蔡秋萍，等. 颈动脉剥脱术的麻醉体会 [J]. 中国药物与临床，2011，11（3）：326-327.
[7] 耿志宇，许　幸. 瑞芬太尼的临床药理学[J]. 国外医学·麻 醉学与复苏医学，2004，24（4）：203-206.
[8] 何二宁. 心功能Ⅱ~Ⅲ级老年患者的全麻应用瑞芬太尼 联合异丙酚双通道把控输注临床效果观察[J]. 临床和实 验医学杂志，2012，11（12）：938-939.
[9] 张雁华，王天龙. 利多卡因超声雾化气道表面麻醉无肌松 插管瑞芬太尼半数有效浓[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志，2013，29 （4）：325-327.
[10] 胡乃琴，陆康生，曾因明. 罗哌卡因、布比卡因硬膜外麻醉 对血小板体内活化状态的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志， 2004，24：226-227.
[11] 王　飞. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的几 个重要问题[J]. 外科研究与新技术，2012，1（1）：23-26， 86.
[12] Guay J, Kopp S. Cerebral monitors versus regional anesthe- sia to detect cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing caro- tid endarterectomy: ameta-analysis [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2013, 60(3): 266-279.

相似文献/References:

[1]唐　铸　桂　铮　李延良　赵建伍　余天垒　张鹏飞　赵立文　于耀宇.药物PAS与支架置入术治疗症状性颈动脉重度狭窄的近期疗效对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(12):727.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.007]
　TANG Zhu,GUI Zheng,LI Yan-liang,et al.Comparison of clinical effect of intensive therapy with PAS on severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis with that of carotid artery stenting[J].,2015,(05):727.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.12.007]
[2]朝　博 综述　王　涛 审校.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中监测的研究进展[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):247.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.021]
[3]马廉亭.关于“颈动脉内膜切除术”手术名称的商榷[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(04):251.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.04.022]
[4]宋　平　陈晓斌　杜　浩　蔡　强　罗　明　阮　航　吴京雷　段发亮.内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(09):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.006]
　SONG Ping,CHEN Xiao-bin,DU Hao,et al.Clinical analysis of carotid endarterectomy for ischemic stroke[J].,2016,(05):527.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.006]
[5]唐　冬,陈金华,陈　涛,等.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术横向与纵向皮肤切口术后颅神经损伤比较[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):696.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.014]
[6]杨　丽　张　穗　王　婷.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中的配合及护理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(04):262.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.04.022]
[7]董　辉　张　晖　蔡　磊　叶权亿　刘　波.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(08):587.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.08.023]
[8]秦海林　秦　汉　安学锋　別毕洲.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(12):775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.003]
　QIN Hai-lin,QIN Han,AN Xue-feng,et al.Effect of carotid endarterectomy on patients with severe stenosis of internal carotid artery[J].,2018,(05):775.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.12.003]
[9]晁晓峰　谢满意　陈洪福　李中林　于如同.颈外动脉缺如并颈内动脉狭窄1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):63.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.021]
[10]秦海林　胡军民　秦　汉　安学锋.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术后缺血型脑卒中的防治[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(11):743.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.003]
　QIN Hai-lin,HU Jun-min,QIN Han,et al.Prevention of postoperative ischemic stroke in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy[J].,2020,(05):743.[doi:doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.11.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：内蒙古医科大学附属医院一般项目（NYFY YB 2014013）
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-05-30