[1]闫亚洲,诸德源,赵普远,等.血流导向装置在血泡样动脉瘤治疗中安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(10):670-672+697.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.10.009]
 YAN Ya-zhou,ZHU De-yuan,ZHAO Pu-yuan,et al.Effect of flow diverter stent treatment on blood blister-like aneurysm and its safety: a Meta-analysis[J].,2018,(10):670-672+697.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.10.009]
点击复制

血流导向装置在血泡样动脉瘤治疗中安全性和有效性的Meta分析()
分享到:

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年10期
页码:
670-672+697
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of flow diverter stent treatment on blood blister-like aneurysm and its safety: a Meta-analysis
文章编号:
1009-153X(2018)10-0670-03
作者:
闫亚洲诸德源赵普远黄清海
200433 上海,海军军医大学附属长海医院神经外科(闫亚洲、诸德源、赵普远、黄清海)
Author(s):
YAN Ya-zhou ZHU De-yuan ZHAO Pu-yuan HUANG Qing-hai.
Department of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
关键词:
血泡样动脉瘤血流导向装置安全性有效性Meta分析
Keywords:
Blood blister-like aneurysm Flow diverter stent Safety Effects Meta analysis
分类号:
R 743.9; R 815.2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.10.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 系统分析血流导向装置(FD)治疗血泡样动脉瘤(BBA)的效果。方法 计算机检索2008年1月至2017年12月PubMed以及Embases数据库中相关文献,由3名评价员独立筛选、评价文献并提取资料,使用RevMan5.3对相关数据进行分析。结果 14篇回顾性文献被纳入,包括115例120个BBA。Meta分析显示:完全闭塞率为69%,复发率为13%,再出血率为8%;手术相关并发症发生率和病死率分别为29%和11%;长期预后良好率为86 %。亚组分析显示,相对于重叠FD支架治疗BBA,单FD支架治疗具有更好的预后(P=0.02),但治愈率和手术相关并发症发生率没有显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 FD治疗BBA是安全和有效的。单FD支架与重叠FD支架相比,具有更好的预后。
Abstract:
Objective To assess of the curative effect of flow diverter (FD) stent on blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) and its safety. Methods PubMed and Embase databases were searched for the article related to BBAs treated with FD stent published from January 2008 till December, 2017. Meta analysis of the data was performed by RevMan5.3 software. Results Fourteen retrospective studies which were obtained included 115 patients with 120 BBAs. The rate of complete occlusion of BBAs was 69%. The rate of Recurrence and rebleeding of BBAs were 13% and 8% respectively. The rate of procedure-related complication and mortality were 29% and 11% respectively. The rate of long-term good prognoses was 86%. The rate of good prognoses was significantly higher in the patients with BBAs treated by single FD stent than that in the patients with BBAs treated by overlapped FD stent (P=0.02). There were in significant differences in the rate of complete occlusion of BBAs and occurrence of the procedure-related complication. Conclusions FD stent is a safe and effective method to treat BBAs. Single FD stent strategy may result in a higher good outcome rate compared to overlapped FD stent strategy.

参考文献/References:

[1] Aydin K, Arat A, Sencer S, et al. Treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms with flow diverter SILK stents [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(3): 202-209.
[2] Yang C, Vadasz A, Szikora I. Treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms using primary flow-diverter stenting with considerations for adjunctive coiling: a single-centre experience and literature review [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2017, 23(5): 465-476.
[3] Ryan RW, Khan AS, Barco R, et al. Pipeline flow diversion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the supraclinoid carotid artery using a single-device strategy [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(6): E11.
[4] Luecking H, Engelhorn T, Lang S, et al. Fred flow diverter: a study on safety and efficacy in a consecutive group of 50 patients [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(3): 596-602.
[5] Lozupone E, Piano M, Valvassori L, et al. Flow diverter devices in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience [J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 128(4): 1037-1043.
[6] Linfante I, Mayich M, Sonig A, et al. Flow diversion with Pipeline Embolic Device as treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to blister aneurysms: dual-center experience and review of the literature [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(1): 29-33.
[7] Duman E, Coven I, Yildirim E, et al. Endovascular treat- ment of wide necked ruptured saccular aneurysms with flow-diverter stent [J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2017, 27(3): 362- 367.
[8] Cerejo R, Bain M, John S, et al. Flow diverter treatment of cerebral blister aneurysms [J]. Neuroradiology, 2017, 59 (12): 1285-1290.
[9] Shankar JJ, Tampieri D, Iancu D, et al. SILK flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registry [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(3): 273-278.
[10] Lin N, Brouillard AM, Keigher KM, et al. Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(11): 808-815.
[11] Yoon JW, Siddiqui AH, Dumont TM, et al. Feasibility and safety of pipeline embolization device in patients with ruptured carotid blister aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 75(4): 419-429.
[12] Hu YC, Chugh C, Mehta H, et al. Early angiographic occlu sion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the internal carotid artery using the Pipeline Embolization Device as a primary treatment option [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6: 740-743.
[13] Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Treatment of blister-like aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 74(5): 527-532.
[14] Cinar C, Oran I, Bozkaya H, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy [J]. Neuroradiology, 2013, 55(4): 441-447.
[15] Zhu D, Fang Y, Yang P, et al. Overlapped stenting com- bined with coiling for blood blister-like aneurysms: compa- rison of low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent and non-LVIS stent [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 104: 729-735.
[16] Damiano RJ, Tutino VM, Paliwal N, et al. Compacting a sin- gle flow diverter versus overlapping flow diverters for intra- cranial aneurysms: a computational study [J]. Am J Neuro- radiol, 2017, 38(3): 603-610.
[17] Tomasello A, Romero N, Aixut S, et al. Endovascular treat- ment of intracraneal aneurysm with pipeline embolization device: experience in four centres in Barcelona [J]. Neurol Res, 2016, 38(5): 381-388.
[18] Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Phillips JL, et al. A single pipe- line embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35(8): 1562-1566.

相似文献/References:

[1]马廉亭.颅内血泡样动脉瘤有关问题商榷[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(05):289.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.05.001]
[2]秦 杰 潘 力 杨 铭 黄 河 刘 鹏 温健鹏 马廉亭.Willis覆膜支架治疗颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(04):225.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.04.001]
 QIN Jie,PAN Li,YANG Ming,et al.Willis covered stents for treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of internal carotid artery (report of 12 cases)[J].,2018,(10):225.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.04.001]
[3]陈善文 邢安凤 王 硕.颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤的显微夹闭术效果评价[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(04):228.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.04.002]
 CHEN Shan-wen,XING An-feng,WANG Shuo..Curative effects of microsurgical clipping on blister-like aneurysms of internal carotid artery (report of 15 cases)[J].,2018,(10):228.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.04.002]
[4]廖永鸿 王 刚 张国忠 李明洲 赵庆顺 温运宇 漆松涛 冯文峰.Pipeline密网支架治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤的短期疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(06):385.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.06.001]
 LIAO Yong-hong,WANG Gang,ZHANG Guo-zhong,et al.Short-term curative effect of Pipeline embolization device on complex intracranial aneurysms[J].,2018,(10):385.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.06.001]
[5]蒋海平 赵世光 史怀璋 韩大勇 王春雷 陈 鑫 王开开 田 松.双支架错位重叠技术辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颈内动脉床突上段血泡样动脉瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(11):708.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.11.002]
 JIANG Hai-ping,ZHAO Shi-guang,SHI Huai-zhang,et al.Treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms with double stents dislocation overlapping technique-assisted coils embolization[J].,2018,(10):708.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.11.002]
[6]吴 愚 邓剑平 于 嘉 张 涛 赵振伟.Willis覆膜支架治疗颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,(06):355.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.06.006]
 WU Yu,DENG Jian-ping,YU Jia,et al.Endovascular treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of internal carotid artery using Willis covered stent[J].,2020,(10):355.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.06.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:“十三五”国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC1300700);国家自然科学基金(81571118;81701163)
通讯作者:黄清海,E-mail:ocinhqh@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-30