[1]龙　勇　曾　春　唐　爽　幸文利　张施远　石海平　王　娟.内镜下和显微镜下手术治疗脑室出血铸型的对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(03):158-160.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.03.006]
　LONG Yong,ZENG Chun,TANG Shuang,et al.Minimally invasive surgery for ventricular hemorrhage cast: neuroendoscope assisted surgery vs microsurgery[J].,2018,(03):158-160.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.03.006]
点击复制

内镜下和显微镜下手术治疗脑室出血铸型的对比分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
158-160
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Minimally invasive surgery for ventricular hemorrhage cast: neuroendoscope assisted surgery vs microsurgery
文章编号:
1009-153X（2018）03-0158-03
作者:
龙　勇　曾　春　唐　爽　幸文利　张施远　石海平　王　娟
作者单位：629000 四川，遂宁市中心医院神经外科（龙　勇、曾　春、唐　爽、幸文利、张施远、石海平、王　娟）
Author(s):
LONG Yong;  ZENG Chun;  TANG Shuang;  XING Wen-li;  ZHANG Shi-yuan;  SHI Hai-ping;  WANG Juan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Suining Municipal Centeral Hospital, 629000 China
关键词:
脑室出血; 手术; 显微镜; 神经内镜; 疗效
Keywords:
Ventricular hemorrhage cast;  Neuroendoscope assisted surgery;  Microsurgery;  Curative effects
分类号:
R 743.34; R 651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.03.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比分析内镜下和显微镜下手术治疗脑室出血铸型的有效性及安全性。方法 2015年6月~2016年10月前瞻性收集脑室出血铸型40例，按照随机数字表法分为内镜组（n=20）和显微镜组（n=20）。内镜组在内镜下手术清除脑室血肿，显微镜组在显微镜下手术清除脑室血肿。比较两组术后24 h血肿清除率、引流管带管时间、术后并发症发生率、出院GCS时评分、术后6个月Barthel评分。结果 内镜组术后24 h血肿清除率、出院时GCS评分、术后6个月Barthel评分均明显高于显微镜组（P<0.05），而引流管带管时间明显少于显微镜组（P<0.05）；两组术后并发症发生率无明显差异（P>0.05）。结论 与显微镜下手术相比，内镜下手术清除脑室内血肿疗效更好。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment of ventricular hemorrhage cast with neuroendoscope assisted surgery and microsurgery. Methods Forty patients with intraventricular hemorrhage cast treated in our department from June, 2015 to October, 2016 were randomly divided into neuroendoscope-assisted surgery group（n=20）and microsurgery group （n=20）. The rate of evacuation of hematomas 24 hours after the surgery, draining duration, rate of occurrence of postoperative complications (bleeding, intracranial infection and shunt dependent hydrocephalus), GCS score on discharge, Barthel score 6 months after the treatment were compared between both the groups. Results The rate of evacuation of hematomas 24 hours after the surgery, GCS scores on discharge and Barthel scores 6 months after the treatment were significantly higher in the neuroendoscope-assisted surgery group than those in the microsurgery group (P<0.05). The drainage duration was significantly shorter in the in the neuroendoscope assisted surgery group than that in the microsurgery group (P<0.05). There was insignificant difference in the rates of occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The neuroendoscopie-assited surgery by which the intraventricular hematomas cast is evacuated has the advantages including minimal invasiveness, high efficiency and little impact on brain function and so on. It was worthy of clinical application and popularization.

参考文献/References:

[1] Hu YZ, Wang JW, Luo BY, et al. Epidemiological and clini- cal characteristics of 266 cases of intracerebral hemorrhage in Hang zhou, China [J]. Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2013, 14(6): 496-504.
[2] 阮　航，段发亮　罗　明，等. 导航辅助内镜下手术治疗 高血压性丘脑出血破入脑室[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂 志，2017，22（7）：491-492.
[3] Hallevi H, Albright KC, Aronowski J, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage: Anatomic relationships and clinical implica- tions [J]. Neurology, 2008, 70(6): 848-852.
[4] Idris Z, Raj J, Abdullah JM, et al. Early experience in endo- scopic management of massive intraventricular hemorrhage with literature review [J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2014, 9(3): 124-129.
[5] Chen CC, Liu CL, Tung YN, et al. Endoscopic surgery for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) caused by thalamic hemorrhage: comparisons of endoscopic surgery and external ventricular drainage (EVD) surgery [J]. World Neurosurg, 2011, 75(5): 264-268.
[6] Chan E, Anderson CS, Wang X, et al. Significance of intra- ventricular hemorrhage in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral hemo- rrhage trial results [J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(3): 653-658.
[7] Maslehaty H, Petridis AK, Barth H, et al. Treatment of 817 patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: characteristics, predictive factors and outcome [J]. Clin Pract, 2012, 2(3): 4051-4056.
[8] Steiner T, Vincent C, Morris S, et al. Neurosurgical out- comes after intracerebral hem-orrhage: results of the factor seven for acute hemorrhagic stroke trial (FAST) [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovas Dis, 2011, 20(4): 287-294.
[9] Ziai WC, Melnychuk E, Thompson CB, et al. Occurrence and impact of intracranial pressure elevation during treat- ment of severe intraventricular hemorrhage [J]. Crit Care Med, 2012, 40(5): 1601-1608.
[10] Longatti PL, Martinuzzi A, Fiorindi A, et al. Neuroendo- scopic management of intraventricular hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(2): 35-38.

相似文献/References:

[1]王振宇.脊髓髓内肿瘤诊断与治疗中若干问题的讨论[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(11):641.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.11.001]
[2]黄　斌　李全才　张庭荣　郭运发　吴　昊　罗　坤.内镜 下与显微镜下经蝶手术治疗症状性Rathke囊肿的对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):264.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.003]
　HUANG Bin,LI Quan-cai,ZHANG Ting-rong,et al.Surgery through transsphenoidal approach for symptomatic rathke cleft cysts: endoscopic surgery vs microsurgery[J].,2016,(03):264.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.003]
[3]王光明　成　毅　胡克亮.经侧脑室三角区入路手术治疗重型自发性脑室出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(05):306.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.05.018]
[4]谢宝树　张　林　王　宇　贾　锋　殷玉华.复发性多发胶质母细胞瘤的预后分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):333.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.005]
　XIE Bao-shu,ZHANG Lin,WANG Yu,et al.Analysis of prognoses in patients with recurrent multiple glioblastomas[J].,2016,(03):333.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.005]
[5]陈正和　陈忠平.高级别胶质瘤的治疗现状及思考[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):350.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.010]
[6]满明昊　李立宏　杨彦龙　李　敏　郭少春.颅脑损伤术后细胞免疫指标变化及脾多肽对其影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):362.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.014]
　MAN Ming-hao,LI Li-hong,YANG Yan-yong,et al.Changes in peripheral cells immunity after operation and effect of spleen polypeptide on them in patients with traumatic brain injury[J].,2016,(03):362.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.014]
[7]柯燕燕　周春霞　瞿建美　马丽萍.颞叶癫痫丙泊酚Wada试验中护理配合[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(06):380.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.06.022]
[8]符传艺　陈健龙　张　茂　刘朝晖　黄垂学　黄　军　马建荣　赵建农.表现为脑室出血的颅内破裂动脉瘤的诊治[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):234.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.014]
[9]马　磊　张海红　郭　康　孙树凯　张　亮　贾　栋.神经导航辅助下手术治疗侧脑室脑膜瘤1例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):255.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.023]
[10]王亚平　贾晓雄　王　珺　王林林　谭溢涛　马德得　夏鹤春.神经内镜下与显微镜下经鼻蝶入路手术切除垂体腺瘤的疗效对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(03):145.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.004]
　WANG Ya-ping,JIA Xiao-xiong,WANG-Jun,et al.Resection of pituitary adenomas by endoscopic and microscopic surgery via transnasal transsphenoidal approach: a comparative analysis[J].,2016,(03):145.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.03.004]
[11]阮航,段发亮,罗明,等.导航辅助内镜下手术治疗高血压性丘脑出血破入脑室[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(07):491.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.015]
[12]阮　航　段发亮　罗　明　何主强　陈晓斌.神经导航下内镜手术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室出血的比较[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(05):299.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.05.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：四川省遂宁市市级科研课题 通讯作者：曾　春，E-mail：87975481@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-05