[1]田海港,王本瀚,肖国辉,等.DTI在中等量高血压性基底节区出血中的应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(12):681-684.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.003]
　TIAN Hai-gang,WANG Ben-han,XIAO Guo-hui,et al.Value of DTI in choice of treatment methods and prognosis evaluation of patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage[J].,2023,28(12):681-684.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.003]
点击复制

DTI在中等量高血压性基底节区出血中的应用()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年12期
页码:
681-684
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of DTI in choice of treatment methods and prognosis evaluation of patients with moderate hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage
文章编号:
1009-153X（2023）12-0681-04
作者:
田海港; 王本瀚; 肖国辉; 刘伟; 曹富强; 扶宇; 李经纶
450042郑州，联勤保障部队第九八八医院神经外科（田海港、王本瀚、肖国辉、李经纶）
Author(s):
TIAN Hai-gang;  WANG Ben-han;  XIAO Guo-hui;  LIU Wei;  CAO Fu-qiang;  FU Yu;  LI Jing-lun
Department of Neurosurgery, The 988th Hospital, Joint Logistic Support Force, Zhengzhou 450042, China
关键词:
高血压性脑出血; 基底节; 磁共振弥散张量成像; 预后; 皮质脊髓束
Keywords:
Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage;  Basal ganglia;  Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging;  Prognosis;  Treatment
分类号:
R 743.34; R 651.1+2
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.12.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨磁共振弥散张量成像（DTI）在中等量（30~40 ml）高血压性基底节区出血的治疗方式选择及预后评估中的价值。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月收治的63例中等量高血压性基底节区出血的临床资料。发病 48 h内、2周行DTI检查测量测量各向异性分数（FA）并评估皮质脊髓束（CST）损伤情况，参考美国国立卫生院卒中（NIHSS）量表评分评估肢体运动功能并进行瘫痪分级（PG）。结果 63例中，保守治疗25例（保守组），手术治疗38例（手术组）；CST分级1级13例，2级21例，3级29例；CST分级1~2级中，保守治疗14例，手术治疗20例；CST分级3级中，保守治疗11例，手术治疗18例。发病48 h内，两组正常侧、患侧内囊区FA值均无统计学差异（P>0.05）；发病2周，两组正常侧、患侧内囊区FA值均显著改善（P<0.05），而且，手术组明显优于保守组（P<0.05）。两组发病48 h患侧内囊区FA值与发病2周PG值均呈显著负相关（保守组r=-0.769，P<0.05；手术组r=-0.769，P<0.05）。CST分级1~2级病人，无论是保守治疗，还是手术治疗，发病2周PG均明显降低（P<0.05）；而CST分级3级病人，只有手术治疗病人发病2周PG明显降低（P<0.05）。结论 DTI技术能够准确评估中等量高血压性基底节区出血病人CST损害程度。CST损伤严重的病人，保守治疗往往预后差，早期手术清除血肿有助于CST完整性修复、改善预后。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the value of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the treatment choice and prognosis assessment of patients with moderate (hemotoma volume, 30~40 ml) hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage (HICH). Methods The clinical data of 63 patients with moderate HICH treated from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Anisotropy score (FA) and corticospinal tract (CST) injury were measured by DTI images within 48 h and 2 weeks after the onset. Limb motor function was evaluated with the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score and paralysis grading (PG) was calculated. Results Of these 63 patients, 25 patients were treated conservatively (conservative group) and 38 were treated with surgery (operation group); 13 patients suffered from CST injury Grade 1, 21 from grade 2 and 29 from grade 3. Of the patients with CST injury grades 1~2, 14 patients were treated conservatively and 20 were treated with surgery. Of the patients with CST injury grade 3, 11 cases were treated conservatively and 18 patients were treated surgery. Within 48 h of onset, there was no significant difference in FA values between the two groups (P>0.05). Two weeks after the onset, the FA values of the internal capsular area on both the normal and hemorrhagic sides were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05), and the FA values in the operation group were significantly better than those of the conservative group (P<0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the FA value at 48 h and the PG value at 2 weeks (conservative group: r=-0.769, P<0.05; Operation group: r=-0.769, P<0.05). In patients with CST injury grades 1~2, PG was significantly decreased after 2 weeks of onset in both conservative and operation groups (P<0.05). In patients with CST injury grade 3, PG was significantly decreased only in the operation group (P<0.05). Conclusions DTI can accurately evaluate the degree of CST damage in patients with moderate HICH. For patients with severe CST injury, conservative treatment often has poor prognoses, and early surgical removal of hematoma is helpful to the recovery of CST and improve the patients' prognoses.

参考文献/References:

[1]KUZU Y, INOUE T, KANBARA Y, et al. Prediction of motor function outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage using fractional anisotropy calculated from diffusion tensor imaging [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 33(6): 566-573.
[2]CHAUDHARY N, PANDEY AS, GEMMETE JJ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in hemorrhagic stroke [J]. Exp Neurol, 2015, 272: 88-96.
[3]游　潮，刘　鸣，于学忠，等. 高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南[J]. 中国急救医学，2020，40（8）：689-702.
[4]林静辉，蔺志清，周圣军. 应用弥散张量纤维束成像图研究基底节区脑出血术后CST与肢体运动功能的相关性 [J]. 中华危重症医学杂志（电子版），2021，14（1）：37-40.
[5]KOYAMA T, TSUJI M, NISHIMURA H, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging for intracerebral hemorrhage outcome prediction: comparison using data from the corona radiata/ internal capsule and the cerebral peduncle [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013, 22(1): 72-79.
[6]KUSANO Y, SEGUCHI T, HORIUCHI T. Prediction of functional outcome in acute cerebral hemorrhage using diffusion tensor imaging at 3T: a Prospective study [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30(8): 1561-1565.
[7]张晓飞，刘兴宇，崔建忠，等. 弥散张量成像技术在保守治疗高血压脑出血病人预后评估中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志，2019，35（15）：2465-2468.
[8]赵　轶，席刚明. DTI对高血压性基底节区出血病人CST损伤程度评估的价值[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志，2019， 24（5）：286-288.
[9]FRAGATA I, ALVES M, PAPOILA AL, et al. Early prediction of delayed ischemiaand functional outcome in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of diffusion tensor imaging [J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(8): 2091-2097.
[10]WANG DM, LI J, LIU JR, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging predicts long-term motor functional outcome in patients with acute supratentorial intracranial hemorrhage [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 34(3): 199-205.

相似文献/References:

[1]何明亮　黄浩炜　何永通　陈日朝.额部和颞部钻孔引流术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(06):376.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.06.022]
[2]孙其凯　李珍珠　曹智洁　高　强　王清波　陈　正　耿　鑫　李泽福.3D打印模型引导下经颞部穿刺引流术治疗颅内血肿[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(10):586.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.004]
　SUN Qi-kai,LI Zhen-zhu,CAO Zhi-jie,et al.Treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage by the minimally invasive puncture via temporal region under the guidance of 3D printing model[J].,2016,(12):586.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.004]
[3]何明亮,易铭佳,何永通,等.DTI技术在穿刺引流术治疗高血压性基底节区出血疗效评估中的价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):682.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.010]
　HE Ming-liang,CHEN Rong-hao,CHEN Yin-yan,et al.Clinic effects of minimally invasive techniques on conscious patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage and evaluation of the effects[J].,2016,(12):682.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.010]
[4]白宗旭,师　蔚,姜海涛.高血压性脑出血的个体化手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):717.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.025]
[5]张　淇,李　辉,方开萱.个体化手术治疗对不同部位高血压性脑出血近期预后的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):762.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.010]
　ZHANG Qi,LI Hui,FANG Kai-xuan.Effects of individualized surgical plan on recent prognoses in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].,2016,(12):762.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.010]
[6]吴　亮,宋子木,夏鹤春,等.垂体脓肿的临床特点及经鼻蝶显微手术治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):771.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.013]
[7]李红闪,朱海涛,史彦芳,等.经侧裂-岛叶入路小骨窗显微手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):777.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.016]
[8]梁观钦,蔡厚洪,吴　举.多靶点软通道穿刺术治疗高血压性脑内巨型血肿[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(12):787.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.12.021]
[9]曾祥义　彭　涛.外周血淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值与高血压性脑出血血肿扩大的关系[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(01):7.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.01.003]
　ZENG Xiang-yi,PENG Tao..Relationship of peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio with hematoma enlargement in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J].,2017,(12):7.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.01.003]
[10]陈燕豪,岑卓英,梁春妍,等.高血压性脑出血早期血肿扩大与血压变异性的关系[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(02):80.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.006]
　CHEN Yan-hao,CEN Zhuo-ying,LIANG Chun-yan,et al.Relationship of hematoma enlargement with blood pressure variability early after hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].,2017,(12):80.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.02.006]
[11]任允平.高血压性基底节区出血破入脑室的治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(10):634.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.10.025]
[12]石　浩,樊启涛,袁俊峰,等.小骨窗侧裂入路显微手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血的临床体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(11):715.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.11.024]
[13]胡庆雷　陈维杰　张春华　张俊功　徐厚池福.血小板联合血浆治疗长期口服阿司匹林并脑出血的体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(03):195.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.03.027]
[14]余浩,郭西良,马奎,等.简易体位辅助经额穿刺引流术治疗高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(07):480.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.011]
　YU Hao,GUO Xi-liang,MA Kui,et al.Simple posture-assisted transfrontal puncture evacuation for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage[J].,2017,(12):480.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.07.011]
[15]阮航 杨国平 罗明 段发亮 闵强 张严国.经额部和经颞部入路导航辅助下内镜手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血的对比分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,(10):693.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.007]
　RUAN Hang,YANG Guo-ping,LUO Ming,et al.Neuroendoscopic surgery under neuronavigation guidance for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage: frontal appraoch vs.temporal approach[J].,2017,(12):693.[doi:10.13792017.09/j.issn.1009-153X.2017.10.007]
[16]千　超　王建峰.穿刺引流术治疗高血压性基底节区出疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(01):33.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.012]
[17]文　明　杨先清.去大骨瓣减压术治疗高血压性基底节区大量出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(01):45.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.01.018]
[18]陈绪刚　黄前樟　董小清.小骨窗开颅术治疗老年高血压性基底节区出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(05):364.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.05.022]
[19]李连进,佟建州,孙文栋,等.钻孔引流术联合重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗高血压性脑出血[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,(09):624.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2018.09.018]
[20]孙　青　刘永春　尤万春　高　薇　陆　挺　李金泉　陈　罡　王　中.经外侧裂-岛叶入路手术治疗高血压性基底节区出血的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2019,(01):16.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.004]
　SUN Qing,LIU Yong-chun,YOU Wan-chun,et al.Analysis of curative effects of surgery through transsylvian-insular approach on hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage[J].,2019,(12):16.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2019.01.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2023-06-01收稿，2023-09-20修回）
基金项目：河南省医学科技计划项目（LHGJ20210811）
通讯作者：李经纶，E-mail：1105106567@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-31