[1]李光亮,王方艺,李良,等.创伤性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后并发感染的危险因素分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2023,28(09):573-576580.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.09.008]
　LI Guang-liang,WANG Fang-yi,LI Liang,et al.Risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt[J].,2023,28(09):573-576580.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.09.008]
点击复制

创伤性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后并发感染的危险因素分析()
分享到：

《中国临床神经外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-153X/CN:42-1603/TN]

卷:
28
期数:
2023年09期
页码:
573-576580
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt
文章编号:
1009-153X（2023）09-0573-04
作者:
李光亮; 王方艺; 李良; 张翼
474150河南，邓州市人民医院神经外科（李光亮、王方艺、李良、张翼）
Author(s):
LI Guang-liang;  WANG Fang-yi;  LI Liang;  ZHANG Yi
Department of Neurosurgery, Dengzhou People's Hospital, Dengzhou 474150, China
关键词:
创伤性脑积水; 脑室-腹腔分流术; 术后感染; 危险因素; 列线图模型
Keywords:
Post-traumatic hydrocephalus;  Ventriculoperitoneal shunt;  Infection;  Risk factors;  Nomogram model
分类号:
R 742.7; R 651.1+1
DOI:
10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2023.09.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨创伤性脑积水（PTH）病人脑室-腹腔分流术（VPS）后发生感染的危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2015年5月至2020年5月VPS治疗的250例PTH的临床资料。术后随访1年，评估感染情况，包括VPS相关的颅内感染、切口感染、腹腔感染。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析术后感染的危险因素，并构建列线图模型，采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线评估模型的预测效能。结果 术后随访1年，32例（12.8%）发生感染，其中8例脑室端感染，14例腹腔端感染，3例腹腔假性囊肿，7例感染后脑脊液蛋白及纤维素含量过高引起分流管阻塞；表皮葡萄球菌16例，金黄色葡萄球菌7例，革兰氏阴性菌6例，其他细菌3例；31例治愈，1例因其他疾病死亡。多因素logistic回归分析显示，年龄≥60岁（OR=0.366，95% CI 0.153~0.877，P=0.024）、合并糖尿病（OR=0.153，95% CI 0.053~0.445，P=0.001）、去骨瓣减压术（OR=0.213，95% CI 0.084~0.536，P=0.001）、分流管暴露时间≥30 min（OR=0.178，95% CI 0.071~0.446，P<0.001）是PTH病人VPS后出现感染的独立危险因素。根据这6个危险因素构建预测感染的列线图总分为330分，当分值>180分时，PTH病人VPS后感染的风险预测值>90%；ROC曲线分析显示列线图曲线下面积值显著高于单一指标（P<0.05）。结论 高龄、糖尿病、去骨瓣减压术及分流管暴露时间长是PTH病人VPS后发生感染的高危因素，根据这些高危因素构建的列线图模型具有较好的预测价值，可为PTH病人VPS后感染的临床预判与治疗提供参考。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the risk factors of postoperative infection in patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Methods The clinical data of 250 patients with PTH treated with VPS from May 2015 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were followed up for 1 year to evaluate the infection status, including VPS-related intracranial infection, incision infection, and abdominal infection. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative infection, and a nomogram model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the nomogram model. Results Of these 250 patients, 32 patients (12.8%) suffered from postoperative infection, of which 8 patients were intraventricular infection, 14 intraperitoneal infection, 3 intraperitoneal pseudocysts, and 7 shunt tube obstruction caused by high levels of protein and cellulose in cerebrospinal fluid. Sixteen patients were infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis, 7 with Staphylococcus aureus, 6 with gram-negative bacteria, and 3 with other bacteria. Thirty-one patients were cured and one died of other diseases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥60 years (OR=0.366, 95%CI 0.153~0.877, P=0.024), diabetes (OR=0.153, 95%CI 0.053~0.445, P=0.001), decompressive craniotomy (OR=0.213, 95%CI 0.084~0.536, P=0.001), shunt exposure time ≥30 min (OR=0.178, 95%CI 0.071~0.446, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for infection in PTH patients after VPS. A nomogram model was constructed based on these 6 risk factors, and the total score of the model for predicting infection was 330. When the score was >180, the risk of infection in PTH patients after VPS was >90%. ROC curve analysis showed that the area value under the curve of the model was significantly higher than that of any single risk factor (P<0.05). Conclusions Elder age, diabetes mellitus, decompressectomy and long shunt exposure time are high risk factors for infection in PTH patients after VPS. The nomogram model constructed according to these high risk factors has good predictive value, and can provide reference for clinical prediction and treatment of infection in PTH patients after VPS.

参考文献/References:

[1] XU H, WANG JW, LI JQ, et al. High fibrosis indices in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with shunt-dependent post-traumatic chronic hydrocephalus [J]. Transl Neurosci, 2016, 7(1): 92-97.
[2] LIU G, LIU J, ZHANG H, et al. Clinical evaluation a new treatment for infection after ventriculoperitoneal shunt [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(1): e46-e49.
[3] TERVONEN J, ADAMS H, LINDGREN A, et al. Shunt performance in 349 patients with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2021, 163(10): 2703-2714.
[4] WHITE I, TUOHY M, TURNER M, et al. Prepontine shunting for pseudotumor cerebri in previously failed shunt patients: a 5-year analysis [J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 88(2): 306-312.
[5] 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会神经重症专家委员会，北京医学会神经外科学分会神经外科危重症学组. 神经外科中枢神经系统感染诊治中国专家共识（2021版）[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2021，37（1）：2-15.
[6] 柏　瑞，赵丽娜，陈　毅，等. 脑室-腹腔分流术后感染的影响因素分析及手术操作改良[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志，2021，7（6）：345-349.
[7] SARGUNA P, LAKSHMI V. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection [J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2006, 24(1): 52-54.
[8] ZERVOS T, WALTERS BC. Diagnosis of ventricular shunt infection in children: a systematic review [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 129: 34-44.
[9] 蒲　珂，李庆国，李国栋，等. 预防性应用抗生素对脑室-腹腔分流术后感染的影响[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2019，35（3）：298-301.
[10] ALBEHAIR MA, ALOSAIL MA, ALBULWI NM, et al. A retrospective study on the avoidability of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections in a university hospital in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia [J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(2): e13135.
[11] BERBUDI A, RAHMADIKA N, TJAHJADI AI, et al. Type 2 diabetes and its impact on the immune system [J]. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2020, 16(5): 442-449.
[12] PATTAVILAKOM A, XENOS C, BRADFIELD O, et al. Reduction in shunt infection using antibiotic impregnated CSF shunt catheters: an Australian prospective study [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2007, 14(6): 526-531.
[13] YANG YN, ZHANG J, GU Z, et al. The risk of intracranial infection in adults with hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a retrospective study [J]. Int Wound J, 2020, 17(3): 722-728.
[14] 田晓静，邢永国，张淑祥，等. 脑室-腹腔分流术后感染治疗及预防的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志，2017，3（5）：297-299.
[15] CLEAVE B, CARTMILL M, SOO SS, et al. Fever in a child with cerebrospinal fluid access device or shunt: a pragmatic approach to management [J]. Arch Dis Child, 2017, 102(4): 366-370.
[16] KANANGI SMR, BALASUBRAMANIAM C. Shunt infections: are view and analysis of a personalseries [J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2018, 34(10): 1915-1924.
[17] WEI Q, XU Y, PENG K, et al. Value of the application of neuroendoscope in the treatment of ventriculoperitoneal shunt blockage [J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 116: e469-e475.
[18] 关　峰，胡志强，黄　辉，等. 脑室系统感染的神经内镜诊疗策略[J]. 中华神经外科杂志，2014，30（4）：377-380.
[19] ATES N, KAFADAR A, AYGUN G, et al. Usage of a bundle application process in decreasing ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections [J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2020, 30(4): 550-555.
[20] LOPACINSKI AB, GUY KM, BURGESS JR, et al. Differences in outcome between open vs laparoscopic insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunts [J]. Am Surg, 2022, 88(4): 716-721.

相似文献/References:

[1]周　平　邓　燕　王　辉　罗　杰　胡钧涛　刘开军　李安荣　李新建.脊髓脊膜膨出合并脑积水分流手术时机的选择[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(11):692.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.11.017]
[2]娄元华　李小勇　陈红伟　潘栋超　解东成　刘东升.婴儿脑积水分流术后硬膜下积液的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(04):245.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.04.019]
[3]云德波　张　逵　范润金　唐　辉　谯　飞　陈华轩.脑室-腹腔分流术后分流不畅的原因分析及处理[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):92.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.011]
　YUN De-bo,ZHANG Kui,FAN Run-Jin,et al.Analysis of cause and countermeasures of poor diversion after ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with hydrocephalus[J].,2016,(09):92.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.011]
[4]张清超　陈新生.腰大池-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(02):103.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.02.015]
[5]张宏兵　苏宝艳　王晓峰　马　青　杨晓亮.原发性正常压力脑积水术前评估的临床价值[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(01):47.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.01.017]
[6]张　源　王文浩　林　洪　林俊明　黄　巍　李　君　罗　飞　胡连水.侧脑室后角穿刺术的新方法介绍[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(01):26.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.01.009]
[7]郑安锡　黄晓明　袁晓东　唐文华　陈世平　程　文　张　瑜.两种术式治疗交通性脑积水的疗效分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(09):563.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.09.020]
[8]于　峰　王　路　门学忠　朱　冰　孙希炎.重度脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后继发硬膜下血肿2例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(03):192.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.03.025]
[9]任瑞明　成文平　楚鹏飞　张　伟　李会兵　张　坤.脑室-腹腔分流术治疗脑积水48例[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2015,(01):50.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2015.01.017]
[10]郑　虎　张红波　袁辉胜.脑室-腹腔分流术后感染16例保守治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,(08):495.[doi:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.08.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
（2023-04-25收稿，2023-08-04修回）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-30